![]() |
The "Beautiful" Formula
Hi,
Can someone please decipher the following "beautiful" formula for me? [url]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ReciprocalMultifactorialConstant.html[/url] m(3)=1/3!!!!!+?+?+..... * What's the next/previous addend in the series sum? Thanks in advance. |
[QUOTE=a1call;433784]Hi,
Can someone please decipher the following "beautiful" formula for me? [url]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ReciprocalMultifactorialConstant.html[/url] m(3)=1/3!!!!!+?+?+..... * What's the next/previous addend in the series sum? Thanks in advance.[/QUOTE] ETA I just realized that I put an example with too many Exclamation marks for n=3. |
I assume that they mean this (in your example):
\[m(3)=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3!}+\frac{1}{3!!}+\frac{1}{3!!!}+\ldots\] |
[QUOTE=Nick;433799]I assume that they mean this (in your example):
\[m(3)=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3!}+\frac{1}{3!!}+\frac{1}{3!!!}+\ldots\][/QUOTE] Thank you for the reply [B]Nick[/B], So it should be k=0 rather than n=0 then. Can't wrap my head around what happens when the Exclamation marks exceed n. ETA And k=0 is undefined, or is a multifactorial with 0 exclamation marks just n? |
[QUOTE=a1call;433848]
Can't wrap my head around what happens when the Exclamation marks exceed n. [/QUOTE] Perhaps you should read the definition of multifactorial: [url]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multifactorial.html[/url] The examples given indicate what the result is for, say, 3!!!!. So does the definition, but for some folks examples are the way to enlightenment. |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;433861]Perhaps you should read the definition of multifactorial:
[url]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multifactorial.html[/url] The examples given indicate what the result is for, say, 3!!!!. So does the definition, but for some folks examples are the way to enlightenment.[/QUOTE] Thank you [B][B]VBCurtis[/B][/B], So the only question [B]marks [/B]remaining is: * What is the definition of a multifactorial of n with 0 exclamation [B]marks[/B] * Does the "beautiful" formula has a typo showing n=0 (to my poor vision) instead of k=0 or while we are at it k=1 I appreciate your clarification [B][B]VBCurtis[/B][/B]:smile: |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;433861]Perhaps you should read the definition of multifactorial:
[url]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multifactorial.html[/url] The examples given indicate what the result is for, say, 3!!!!. So does the definition, but for some folks examples are the way to enlightenment.[/QUOTE] I think the problem is that the first part of the ink he gave says [TEX]m(n) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty ... [/TEX] where what's being summed contains a value k not given and n is an input then varies. |
If this code is complete and all inclusive:
[CODE]fac(n,d)=prod(k=0,(n-1)\d,n-k*d);\\Multifactorial\\Credits: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Multifactorial#PARI.2FGP fac(19,0) [/CODE] [CODE] *** at top-level: fac(19,0) *** ^--------- *** in function fac: prod(k=0,(n-1)\d,n-k*d) *** ^--------- *** _\_: impossible inverse in sdivsi_rem: 0. [/CODE] |
[QUOTE=a1call;433868]
* What is the definition of a multifactorial of n with 0 exclamation [B]marks[/B] [/QUOTE] Are you really asking what "n" means? An "n" without a factorial symbol would be... n. Also: what is 0! defined as? If you don't know, look it up. |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;433876]Are you really asking what "n" means? An "n" without a factorial symbol would be... n.
[/QUOTE] Well a n would be out of phase in the sequence/series: n=19 -------- n=19 n!=121645100408832000 n!!=654729075 n!!!=1106560 n!!!!=65835 |
[QUOTE=a1call;433879]Well a n would be out of phase[/QUOTE]
ah but if you define the value with 0 factorials behind it the same way as say n!: n! = n*(n-1)*(n-2)... *2*1 n!! = n*(n-2)*(n-4).... then continuing downward: n = n*(n-0)*(n-2*0) you run into the problem that no matter how many times you subtract 0 you won't hit the negative numbers so is it n^oo ? that's what it would need to be to fit into the rest of the values. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:31. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.