![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
hi,
here is a sieve-file for R102 n= 100k to 200k sieved to 7T |
hi,
the following range is done S106 n= 25k to 100k sieved to 7T results emailed |
hi,
did you look at the conjecture of R15 ? [URL="http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/tab/CRUS_tab.htm"]http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/tab/CRUS_tab.htm[/URL] ... around 36T k´s ... maybe i should do a range from k=10M to ?M, n=to 25k with the script and openpfgw first |
[QUOTE=lalera;441715]hi,
did you look at the conjecture of R15 ? [URL]http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/tab/CRUS_tab.htm[/URL] ... around 36T k´s ... maybe i should do a range from k=10M to ?M, n=to 25k with the script and openpfgw first[/QUOTE] Hmm, I missed that part, there are a lot left, can you do the current range for the last 14k's at k<10M? |
[QUOTE=rebirther;441717]Hmm, I missed that part, there are a lot left, can you do the current range for the last 14k's at k<10M?[/QUOTE]
hi, yes i will do |
hi,
reserving R15 n=200k-400k to sieve for BOINC |
I would suggest against testing k>10M on R15 at this point. We are unlikely to get all k tested on it in the foreseeable future. Testing k<10M to n=400K is fine. Some bases are just not worth attempting to test all k's.
|
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;441725]I would suggest against testing k>10M on R15 at this point. We are unlikely to get all k tested on it in the foreseeable future. Testing k<10M to n=400K is fine. Some bases are just not worth attempting to test all k's.[/QUOTE]
hi, ok, thank you |
[QUOTE=gd_barnes;441725]I would suggest against testing k>10M on R15 at this point. We are unlikely to get all k tested on it in the foreseeable future. Testing k<10M to n=400K is fine. Some bases are just not worth attempting to test all k's.[/QUOTE]
k = 2^31 is a natural bound for these monster bases, as that's the limit for using sr2sieve. There's a reasonable argument for running the script on R7 and R15 to 2^31 (or just 2e9 for bookkeeping cleanliness), to maximize the use of sr2sieve; such an effort could reach top-5000 level somewhat efficiently. I agree with Gary that it's ridiculous to contemplate testing all k's for R7 or R15, but I'm interested in testing to 2^31- I'll help with sieving if Lalera et al wish to proceed. |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;441744]k = 2^31 is a natural bound for these monster bases, as that's the limit for using sr2sieve. There's a reasonable argument for running the script on R7 and R15 to 2^31 (or just 2e9 for bookkeeping cleanliness), to maximize the use of sr2sieve; such an effort could reach top-5000 level somewhat efficiently.
I agree with Gary that it's ridiculous to contemplate testing all k's for R7 or R15, but I'm interested in testing to 2^31- I'll help with sieving if Lalera et al wish to proceed.[/QUOTE] i will proceed later with R7 and R15 at this time i have no free resources feel free to sieve R7 and R15 for sr2sieve For sequences k*b^n+/-1 and prime factor p, the following limits apply: 1 < k < 2^32. 1 < b < 2^32. core(k)*core(b) < 2^31. (core(k) is the squarefree part of k). 0 < n < 2^32. k,b < p < 2^52. (or 2^62 for x86/x86-64 builds, or 2^63 for ppc64). (taken from the readme) k=up to 4e9 |
hi,
the following range is done R145 n= 25k to 100k sieved to 7T results emailed |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 08:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.