[QUOTE=Madpoo;444466]One other "complaint" about cudalucas is the lack of a shift count feature... fortunately it doesn't happen much, but 2 or 3 times I've accidentally assigned work to him that was done on cudalucas and was also previously done by cudalucas... so both runs had a zero shift count.[/QUOTE]

I think it did get a shift count some time ago.

The results.txt lines include an "offset = " clause which looks very much like a shift count. The value is invariably between 0 and p.

Example:
[CODE]M( [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=39529741&full=1"]39529741[/URL] )C, 0xb12e6cd5d623ddc5, offset = 11620785, n = 2160K, CUDALucas v2.05.1[/CODE]

Is this value not being recorded when results are reported manually?

[QUOTE=GP2;444297]From the documentation, running with the -cufftbench option writes a file <gpu> fft.txt with parameters for FFT length selection. However, this file is not read by the CUDALucas program. It seems to be for information only, for human visual inspection.[/QUOTE]

From looking at the source code, the program actually does read in the <gpu> fft.txt file. The documentation does not mention this, it only describes the option to create this file.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;444466]Do you (or anyone else) know the [B]exact[/B] exponent sizes that cudalucas uses for it's FFT breakpoints?[/QUOTE]

Here is a list up to 8192K, let me know if you need higher (the FFT is in kilobyte):
[url]http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/CUDALucasFFTranges.txt[/url]

The FFT ranges are produced on a per card basis. What card was that file produced with, ATH?

Yes, the tests are shifted per GP2's comments.

Ok, the list was created on a Titan Black:

name GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Compatibility 3.5
clockRate (MHz) 1071
memClockRate (MHz) 3500
totalGlobalMem 6442450944
totalConstMem 65536
l2CacheSize 1572864
sharedMemPerBlock 49152
regsPerBlock 65536
warpSize 32
memPitch 2147483647
maxThreadsPerBlock 1024
maxThreadsPerMP 2048
multiProcessorCount 15
maxThreadsDim[3] 1024,1024,64
maxGridSize[3] 2147483647,65535,65535
textureAlignment 512
deviceOverlap 1


I thought that the crossover points between FFTs was the same for different cards. Why would the crossover points depend on the hardware? it should be dependent only on the FFT size.

I know the <GPU> fft.txt is dependant on the GPU because it only shows the fastest FFTs for that card and ignores all the others. But my list is ALL the possible FFTs and the exponents limits should be the same?

I may be misrecalling. Maybe I'm thinking of -cufftbench.

[QUOTE=Dubslow;444536]I may be misrecalling. Maybe I'm thinking of -cufftbench.[/QUOTE]

Yes, I think so. The -cufftbench generates the GPU specific "<GPU> fft.txt" file which out of the long list of FFTs I listed only shows the fastests FFTs in an increasing order. But I think that every time for example 2592K FFT makes it to your file because it is fast on your GPU, then the "max exp" next to it should be the same each time: 2592 48471289

Could you run it a couple times to confirm? Might be that the roundoff data randomly changes by a percent or two each time which could affect the max exponent a percent or two.

The numbers match cufftbench I did months ago as well as benchmarks done with CUDALucas compiled with both CUDA 6.5, 8.0 and several earlier versions.

[QUOTE=Dubslow;444524]The FFT ranges are produced on a per card basis. What card was that file produced with, ATH?

Yes, the tests are shifted per GP2's comments.[/QUOTE]

Oh, well... phooey. Is it clLucas that doesn't do shift counts? One of those GPU programs doesn't do it but now I'm not sure which one...

[QUOTE=Madpoo;444581]Oh, well... phooey. Is it clLucas that doesn't do shift counts? One of those GPU programs doesn't do it but now I'm not sure which one...[/QUOTE]

The two recent bad results from AirSquirrels look like they were run by cllucas anyway, not cudalucas.

Another sad thing I noticed... it doesn't look like either of those report error codes. Every result from either cllucas or cudalucas have an error code of zero (or none at all...)

Is that not a supported feature on those apps? it doesn't keep track of rounding errors, repeatable or not, like Prime95 does?

My thought was I could look for exponents done by whatever GPU app around certain FFT breakpoints, and if they showed evidence of having rounding errors (by looking at the error code), maybe I could draw some data from that. But looks like I hit a dead end. Bummer. If anyone can think of another way using available data, I can take a different tack, but I'm out of ideas there.

My best alternate approach was simply look at all good/bad results from those GPU apps, broken down into 1e6 chunks, and see if there are any spikes in bad results. Sadly there aren't a lot of results to chew on so the data is a bit choppy. I think I can only compare *known* good/bad results, but not any of the unknown/unverified stuff. There just aren't that many in any given 1M range of exponents. 38M had the most with 483 known results from cllucas apps (3 of which were bad).

In other words, just a dearth of data, but here's what I have... the "range" is the 1e6 range, i.e. 40 = 40M-41M
[CODE]clLucas
Range Bad Total PercentBad
34 1 51 1.96078431372549
35 3 88 3.40909090909091
36 6 382 1.57068062827225
37 2 298 0.671140939597315
38 3 483 0.62111801242236
39 3 213 1.40845070422535
40 5 77 6.49350649350649
43 1 28 3.57142857142857
44 1 27 3.7037037037037
56 2 27 7.40740740740741
57 1 56 1.78571428571429
58 3 36 8.33333333333333
59 2 31 6.45161290322581
60 1 6 16.6666666666667
64 1 2 50[/CODE]

[CODE]cudaLucas
Range Bad Total PercentBad
1 1 9 11.1111111111111
22 1 2 50
25 4 180 2.22222222222222
26 59 621 9.50080515297907
27 18 651 2.76497695852535
28 4 165 2.42424242424242
29 22 511 4.30528375733855
30 23 300 7.66666666666667
31 20 468 4.27350427350427
32 7 609 1.14942528735632
33 41 775 5.29032258064516
34 22 1254 1.75438596491228
35 32 949 3.37197049525817
36 21 1159 1.81190681622088
37 25 856 2.92056074766355
38 22 655 3.3587786259542
39 8 358 2.23463687150838
40 2 361 0.554016620498615
41 4 196 2.04081632653061
42 2 127 1.5748031496063
44 1 77 1.2987012987013
45 11 185 5.94594594594595
46 3 77 3.8961038961039
47 2 145 1.37931034482759
48 1 216 0.462962962962963
49 1 56 1.78571428571429
50 1 22 4.54545454545455
51 2 16 12.5
52 2 16 12.5
53 1 17 5.88235294117647
55 1 75 1.33333333333333
56 6 63 9.52380952380952
57 3 65 4.61538461538462
58 5 56 8.92857142857143
59 6 70 8.57142857142857
60 2 33 6.06060606060606
61 4 16 25
62 3 8 37.5
63 1 14 7.14285714285714
64 2 27 7.40740740740741
66 5 15 33.3333333333333
67 4 23 17.3913043478261
68 6 32 18.75
69 24 38 63.1578947368421
71 1 16 6.25
72 3 28 10.7142857142857
73 56 133 42.1052631578947
74 3 45 6.66666666666667
75 2 19 10.5263157894737
76 1 17 5.88235294117647
77 2 12 16.6666666666667
78 27 43 62.7906976744186
83 1 5 20
100 1 2 50[/CODE]

[CODE]Prime95 (all variations/versions)
Range Bad Total PercentBad
0 71 42225 0.168146832445234
1 526 57402 0.91634437824466
2 1155 46091 2.50591221713567
3 1436 46194 3.10862882625449
4 1787 45727 3.90797559428784
5 1947 46544 4.18313853557924
6 1824 46107 3.95601535558592
7 2065 45154 4.57323825131771
8 1932 46182 4.18344809666104
9 1610 45176 3.5638392066584
10 1724 45538 3.78584918090386
11 1869 45772 4.08328235602552
12 2061 46275 4.45380875202593
13 2061 46221 4.45901213734017
14 2176 46500 4.67956989247312
15 2585 47213 5.47518691885709
16 2286 46760 4.88879384088965
17 2218 46189 4.80200913637446
18 2097 46386 4.52076057431121
19 1997 45327 4.40576256977078
20 1857 45831 4.05184263926164
21 1822 46603 3.90961955238933
22 1887 45706 4.1285608016453
23 1786 44944 3.97383410466358
24 1698 45154 3.76046418921912
25 1698 44697 3.79891267870327
26 1785 45222 3.94719384370439
27 1699 44475 3.82012366498033
28 1542 44977 3.42841896969562
29 1394 43756 3.18584879787915
30 1416 43883 3.22676207187294
31 1472 43617 3.37483091455167
32 1384 43091 3.21180757002622
33 2413 43253 5.5788037823966
34 1804 42355 4.25923739818203
35 1773 42215 4.1999289352126
36 1474 41028 3.59266842156576
37 1418 41343 3.4298430205839
38 1397 30705 4.54974759811106
39 990 22777 4.34648988014225
40 1106 21589 5.12297929501135
41 774 16129 4.7988095976192
42 466 15305 3.04475661548514
43 486 16052 3.02766010465986
44 394 12502 3.15149576067829
45 463 9587 4.82945655575258
46 459 3639 12.6133553173949
47 371 2039 18.1951937224129
48 239 1702 14.042303172738
49 131 2756 4.75326560232221
50 76 753 10.0929614873838
51 47 767 6.1277705345502
52 43 429 10.02331002331
53 37 685 5.4014598540146
54 28 567 4.93827160493827
55 100 778 12.853470437018
56 82 491 16.7006109979633
57 110 654 16.8195718654434
58 90 1288 6.98757763975155
59 86 487 17.6591375770021
60 95 624 15.224358974359
61 81 716 11.3128491620112
62 69 652 10.5828220858896
63 64 694 9.22190201729107
64 53 618 8.57605177993528
65 46 709 6.48801128349788
66 59 532 11.0902255639098
67 70 961 7.2840790842872
68 33 739 4.46549391069012
69 49 730 6.71232876712329
70 28 229 12.2270742358079
71 18 295 6.10169491525424
72 10 420 2.38095238095238
73 9 330 2.72727272727273
74 20 304 6.57894736842105
75 18 168 10.7142857142857
76 24 164 14.6341463414634
77 9 95 9.47368421052632
78 5 73 6.84931506849315
79 2 19 10.5263157894737
80 1 4 25
89 1 3 33.3333333333333
100 4 18 22.2222222222222
101 1 4 25
150 1 6 16.6666666666667[/CODE]

CUDALucas 2.05 does have shift counts but I heard that some earlier versions of CUDALucas did not, not sure which version started having them.

It also have roundoff checking. From the ini file:

# ErrorIterations tells how often the roundoff error is checked. Larger values
# give shorter iteration times, but introduce some uncertainty as to the actual
# maximum roundoff error that occurs during the test. Default is 100.
ErrorIterations=100


It does not however report any error codes

M( 43728863 )C, 0xc5686ccd71b894__, offset = 21872935, n = 2592K, CUDALucas v2.05.1, AID: 5D5719BA469FA6F7CBC2FD6BE6087FDA
M( 43883923 )C, 0x53ad50181724cb__, offset = 1282, n = 2592K, CUDALucas v2.05.1, AID: A809A786CBC695E6A5D02F4764E00769
M( 50152231 )C, 0x8d3a32c3ceffa6__, offset = 25077601, n = 2744K, CUDALucas v2.05.1, AID: C1D57ECE79CCA42481E0B18EE969D425
M( 76092673 )C, 0xb094499608396f__, offset = 38056420, n = 4320K, CUDALucas v2.05.1
M( 50198279 )C, 0x9b5c83ca3b592c__, offset = 2702, n = 2744K, CUDALucas v2.05.1, AID: 586AC98F222EF9EC7CE0F7E6FED2AE6D
M( 43538569 )C, 0x7d762f3dac0893__, offset = 12158, n = 2592K, CUDALucas v2.05.1

If I am not mistaken, Owftheevil put the shifts into cudaLucas starting after v2.03.

If someone could quad-check 72356909, I purchased two more Titan Blacks from ebay, but they appear to be flashed with an overclocked firmware. TDP is set at 300W and the clock is running at 967.

[QUOTE=airsquirrels;444897]If someone could quad-check 72356909, I purchased two more Titan Blacks from ebay, but they appear to be flashed with an overclocked firmware. TDP is set at 300W and the clock is running at 967.[/QUOTE]
Won't MSI Afterburner deal with the overclocking?

I'm afraid a 72M LL run would probably take me a couple of weeks on the GTX460. It takes about 3.5 days on a 40M to 41M DC. I imagine there are bigger guns around here who would answer sooner.

[QUOTE=kladner;444899]Won't MSI Afterburner deal with the overclocking?

I'm afraid a 72M LL run would probably take me a couple of weeks on the GTX460. I imagine there are bigger guns around here who would answer sooner.[/QUOTE]

I can use NVFlash from within linux to reflash the VBios to stock, however I thought I would give them a go on a few triple checks first to see if the overclock was stable and useful.

Oops! I forgot about your operating environment in suggesting Afterburner.

[QUOTE=airsquirrels;444897]If someone could quad-check 72356909, I purchased two more Titan Blacks from ebay, but they appear to be flashed with an overclocked firmware.[/QUOTE]

I grabbed it, it might take a week or so.

Here's an updated list of strategic DCs...

I had a little time over the last weekend and finally wired up a new feature into my query that analyzes CPU's by year/month.

The change involves adding in a cumulative bad/good count over the lifetime of the system. I had a separate query that did just that, but until now I didn't have a way to query the more granular data by month alongside the lifetime stats.

This lets me look at a particular month where a CPU might have zero good/zero bad, but then the lifetime stats tell me it has 3+ to 1 bad/good, so there's a solid chance this particular month is likewise lousy.

The list below has exponents where the ratio of bad/good is 3:1 for the month itself, or if zero for that month, the lifetime stats are at least 3:1.

I ran 4 similar checks myself earlier this week and got 3 of the 4 mismatching, so I think it's a solid approach. It should help squeeze a bit more juicy mismatches out of the available data. :smile:

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
41485799 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41485799,72,1
41679721 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41679721,72,1
41721551 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41721551,72,1
42395191 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42395191,72,1
44126221 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44126221,72,1
61736771 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=61736771,74,1
66142841 10 3 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=66142841,74,1
66143339 10 3 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=66143339,74,1
70351027 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70351027,74,1
70402373 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70402373,75,1
70402417 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70402417,75,1
70674977 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=70674977,75,1
70922029 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=70922029,75,1
71274391 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=71274391,75,1
72089999 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=72089999,75,1
72832189 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=72832189,75,1
73158083 1 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=73158083,75,1
73755637 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=73755637,75,1
73888403 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=73888403,75,1
74123977 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=74123977,75,1
74271289 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=74271289,75,1
74396849 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=74396849,75,1
74417531 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=74417531,75,1
74495881 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=74495881,75,1
74574139 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=74574139,75,1
74638393 0 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=74638393,75,1
74643971 0 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=74643971,75,1
74683481 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=74683481,75,1
74749193 0 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=74749193,75,1
74794987 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=74794987,75,1
74794991 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=74794991,75,1
74795059 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=74795059,75,1
75089249 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75089249,75,1
75256669 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75256669,75,1
75694397 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75694397,75,1
75818773 1 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=75818773,75,1
76134293 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76134293,75,1
76176511 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76176511,75,1
76886983 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=76886983,75,1
76887007 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=76887007,75,1
76887043 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=76887043,75,1
77033129 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=77033129,75,1
77192587 0 0 0 2 1 1 DoubleCheck=77192587,75,1
79395941 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=79395941,75,1[/CODE]

I took these four:

[CODE]41485799 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41485799,72,1
41679721 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41679721,72,1
41721551 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41721551,72,1
42395191 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42395191,72,1
[/CODE]

[QUOTE=airsquirrels;444897]If someone could quad-check [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=72356909&full=1"]72356909[/URL], I purchased two more Titan Blacks from ebay, but they appear to be flashed with an overclocked firmware. TDP is set at 300W and the clock is running at 967.[/QUOTE]

Your result was incorrect, sorry about that.

[QUOTE=GP2;445277]Your result was incorrect, sorry about that.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the verification. I have since flashed these cards back to stock so I am awaiting the results of the next few tests.

[QUOTE=airsquirrels;445297]Thanks for the verification. I have since flashed these cards back to stock so I am awaiting the results of the next few tests.[/QUOTE]
If problems persist with the updated firmware, consider reducing memory speed by modest decrements.

This suggestion is based on finding with a few GPUs, from different manufacturers, with different chip series, that gaming cards tend to run the RAM too fast for CUDALucas reliability. I have little detailed knowledge of Titans of any flavor, so I have no idea if they may have memory operating on the edge of stability from a number-crunching point of view.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;444998]Here's an updated list of strategic DCs...

[/QUOTE]

Assigned myself what was left of this list. It should take me through November.

Here are the remaining 115 unassigned double checks of exponents mentioned so far in this thread:

[code]
DoubleCheck=55435829,73,1
DoubleCheck=55516297,73,1
DoubleCheck=55555963,73,1
DoubleCheck=55623727,73,1
DoubleCheck=55635631,73,1
DoubleCheck=55875949,73,1
DoubleCheck=55984871,73,1
DoubleCheck=56020733,73,1
DoubleCheck=56020819,73,1
DoubleCheck=56114419,73,1
DoubleCheck=56131703,73,1
DoubleCheck=56385377,73,1
DoubleCheck=56443847,73,1
DoubleCheck=56458279,73,1
DoubleCheck=56702339,73,1
DoubleCheck=56715583,73,1
DoubleCheck=56754437,73,1
DoubleCheck=56801161,73,1
DoubleCheck=56826013,73,1
DoubleCheck=56958299,73,1
DoubleCheck=57014579,73,1
DoubleCheck=57143551,73,1
DoubleCheck=57484201,73,1
DoubleCheck=57652883,73,1
DoubleCheck=57664729,73,1
DoubleCheck=57670841,73,1
DoubleCheck=57792487,73,1
DoubleCheck=58374847,73,1
DoubleCheck=58773223,73,1
DoubleCheck=58974449,73,1
DoubleCheck=65095861,74,1
DoubleCheck=69332441,74,1
DoubleCheck=70663909,75,1
DoubleCheck=71227873,75,1
DoubleCheck=71861917,75,1
DoubleCheck=72029689,75,1
DoubleCheck=72054019,75,1
DoubleCheck=72116249,75,1
DoubleCheck=72162301,75,1
DoubleCheck=72237013,75,1
DoubleCheck=72486503,75,1
DoubleCheck=72486509,75,1
DoubleCheck=72638201,75,1
DoubleCheck=72639043,75,1
DoubleCheck=72639407,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000217,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000237,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000241,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000267,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000273,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000289,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000471,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000549,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000561,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000583,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000607,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000619,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000639,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000687,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000883,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000913,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000927,75,1
DoubleCheck=73001119,75,1
DoubleCheck=73003673,75,1
DoubleCheck=73116257,75,1
DoubleCheck=73116607,75,1
DoubleCheck=73135091,75,1
DoubleCheck=73138057,75,1
DoubleCheck=73139081,75,1
DoubleCheck=73143079,75,1
DoubleCheck=73143311,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146001,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146041,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146043,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146079,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146841,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146901,75,1
DoubleCheck=73147051,75,1
DoubleCheck=73148011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73385537,75,1
DoubleCheck=73385681,75,1
DoubleCheck=73446011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73469003,75,1
DoubleCheck=73469057,75,1
DoubleCheck=73477013,75,1
DoubleCheck=73481381,75,1
DoubleCheck=73491073,75,1
DoubleCheck=73499077,75,1
DoubleCheck=73566947,75,1
DoubleCheck=73647019,75,1
DoubleCheck=73648027,75,1
DoubleCheck=73649033,75,1
DoubleCheck=73649089,75,1
DoubleCheck=73659077,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692041,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692083,75,1
DoubleCheck=73694801,75,1
DoubleCheck=73697053,75,1
DoubleCheck=73697069,75,1
DoubleCheck=73698103,75,1
DoubleCheck=74064449,75,1
DoubleCheck=74698067,75,1
DoubleCheck=74953217,75,1
DoubleCheck=75015701,75,1
DoubleCheck=75015803,75,1
DoubleCheck=75161209,75,1
DoubleCheck=75477893,75,1
DoubleCheck=76006829,75,1
DoubleCheck=76077787,75,1
DoubleCheck=76141001,75,1
DoubleCheck=76193773,75,1
DoubleCheck=77187083,75,1
DoubleCheck=77187181,75,1
DoubleCheck=77888123,75,1
[/code]

Quad checks available
 

If anyone is in the mood for some quad checks, there are a few where AirSquirrels and I have already done 2nd/3rd checks and mismatched (I'm betting mine is correct) and we need a quad checker. :smile:

42183899
42222473
44695687
44695787
48067783
72647011

For the most part we've been swapping triple checks of each other's mismatches which works fine normally, but those OC'd card of his resulted in a handful of oddities like those above.

Speaking of triple-checks, we're down to ~ 470 unassigned triple-checks (2500 or so total including the assigned exponents). We're chipping away and the end is in sight now. And what's left is mostly in the 44M-52M range since I tried to tackle the larger mismatches upfront... the remainder should go quicker.

After that backlog is gone I'll probably just query for new mismatches as needed but then get back to the strategic double-checking (which should, in theory, give more mismatches that need triple-checks... it's the circle of life).

[QUOTE=Madpoo;445738]If anyone is in the mood for some quad checks, there are a few where AirSquirrels and I have already done 2nd/3rd checks and mismatched (I'm betting mine is correct) and we need a quad checker. :smile:[/QUOTE]

I queued all 6.

It is exciting to get to the bottom of the triple checks.

Hopefully one of these strategic DCs eventually leads to a missed prime!

[QUOTE=airsquirrels;445745]It is exciting to get to the bottom of the triple checks.

Hopefully one of these strategic DCs eventually leads to a missed prime![/QUOTE]

The way I reckon it, there's a 5% chance of a missed prime in there. LOL

(Okay, I know someone will say it's not really 5% or whatever the statistical error rate is, but then we don't really know where those sneaky primes are hiding so there's every reason to think there could be one between the current double-check threshold of 37,781,573 and M46-M48). :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;445738]If anyone is in the mood for some quad checks, there are a few where AirSquirrels and I have already done 2nd/3rd checks and mismatched (I'm betting mine is correct) and we need a quad checker. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Yours were correct but M48067783 was factored with P-1 before my test:
[url]http://mersenne.org/M42183899[/url]
[url]http://mersenne.org/M42222473[/url]
[url]http://mersenne.org/M44695687[/url]
[url]http://mersenne.org/M44695787[/url]
[url]http://mersenne.org/M48067783[/url]
[url]http://mersenne.org/M72647011[/url]

[QUOTE=ATH;445964]Yours were correct but M48067783 was factored with P-1 before my test[/QUOTE]

Ah, thanks. That reminds me that I should run another query for things like that: where multiple tests have been run and there may be some good/bad results, but it was factored first. The good results are fine but the bad results should be marked bad.

That's the way it would [I]normally[/I] work if a factor was found [I]after[/I] it was verified, but if the factor is found first and then the LL test was verified later, [B]all[/B] of the results get marked as "verified (factored)".

I think I looked for those a year ago, give or take, but there are probably a few new since then. No sense in letting the bad results slip by as if all was well. :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;446193]Ah, thanks. That reminds me that I should run another query for things like that: where multiple tests have been run and there may be some good/bad results, but it was factored first. The good results are fine but the bad results should be marked bad.

That's the way it would [I]normally[/I] work if a factor was found [I]after[/I] it was verified, but if the factor is found first and then the LL test was verified later, [B]all[/B] of the results get marked as "verified (factored)".

I think I looked for those a year ago, give or take, but there are probably a few new since then. No sense in letting the bad results slip by as if all was well. :smile:[/QUOTE]I am afraid that in the queries available to us, the status of the LL tests on Mersenne numbers for which a factor was found is just factored. One looses the information that the LL test was verified.

In my opinion, the exponent should have a status of factored, but the LL tests should retain their status of bad, unverified or verified.

Jacob

[QUOTE=S485122;446201]I am afraid that in the queries available to us, the status of the LL tests on Mersenne numbers for which a factor was found is just factored. One looses the information that the LL test was verified.

In my opinion, the exponent should have a status of factored, but the LL tests should retain their status of bad, unverified or verified.

Jacob[/QUOTE]

I'd like to have some kind of "verified by LL but also factored" status as well. Maybe that's something George would be amenable to in the future.

LL tests have 5 distinct states:
unverified
verified
bad
suspect
factored

I guess it could even just leave the status alone when a factor is found, but I know for sure some queries and code on the site would need updating since it's depending on things working they way they are now for certain things. Which is why a new status might be easier to shoehorn in.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;446684]...
I guess it could even just leave the status alone when a factor is found, but I know for sure some queries and code on the site would need updating since it's depending on things working they way they are now for certain things. Which is why a new status might be easier to shoehorn in.[/QUOTE]I am not sure that it would disrupt things : the status of an exponent is something else than the status of an LL test. When there are LL tests with different residues, in the end some of them are marked as verified and the others are marked as bad. This means that the records of LL tests must have some field to store their status and do not derive their status from the exponent.

Of course it is easy to write this from my chair, I will not have a thing to do.

Jacob

[QUOTE=S485122;446698]I am not sure that it would disrupt things : the status of an exponent is something else than the status of an LL test. When there are LL tests with different residues, in the end some of them are marked as verified and the others are marked as bad. This means that the records of LL tests must have some field to store their status and do not derive their status from the exponent.

Of course it is easy to write this from my chair, I will not have a thing to do.[/QUOTE]

When an result is reported in for any exponent, the server takes a look and determines what to do. If it's a first test, it merely adds that to the results and then it will make that same exponent available for a double-check (or another "first time" check if that first result was suspect).

Double+ checks get their residue compared to any previous results. If it's a match (and they have different shift counts), the matching pair get marked as good, the oddballs are marked bad. Doesn't matter if they were marked "unverified" or "suspect" in their previous unknown states, they're simply good (verified) or bad at that point.

Where it gets weird is when a factor is found for an exponent. If the exponent hasn't had any LL tests done at all, no worries. If one or more tests are still unverified, they get changed to a status of "factored", no matter what. If the exponent has been successfully double-checked, all "verified" results get changed to "factored" and I think "bad" results stay as bad? I'm not sure if that's automatic or if that's something that was done retroactively and would need to be done again.

I guess the idea here is that the *exponent* is factored but it doesn't make sense, and we lose some interesting data points, to mark older *results* as factored.

The trouble with doing any changes up front in that is there are many queries, reports, jobs, etc. that pay attention, for better or worse, to the fact that LL results for a factored exponent are treated special. They no longer get their residue masked because at that point it doesn't matter. Unassigned LL results for factored exponents are rejected as unnecessary (but assigned results are still accepted, more out of a sense of pity... it handles cases where a slow worker finally turned something in, and in the meanwhile some factoring poacher found a factor first and turned it in).

Some of the difficulties are mere quirks in the database and can probably be solved by merely adding additional states... states that reflect "yes, this exponent is factored, and oh, here's how the LL test itself looks". That way we can just update reports, code, etc. gradually and then update the data itself when all the other pieces are in place with minimal fuss.

I don't know what George's take is on all of that. The current system may work well enough for now, perhaps, and probably bigger fish to fry, but if he was cool with it I might take a peek and get a better idea of the work involved.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;446755]Some of the difficulties are mere quirks in the database and can probably be solved by merely adding additional states... states that reflect "yes, this exponent is factored, and oh, here's how the LL test itself looks". That way we can just update reports, code, etc. gradually and then update the data itself when all the other pieces are in place with minimal fuss.[/QUOTE]

The most straightforward thing to do, I think, would be just to have two separate status fields: factored/not factored on the one hand, and unverified (unknown)/unverified (suspect)/verified (good)/verified (bad).

Or maybe implemented as three bit flags in a single field: a factored/not factored bit, a verified/unverified bit, and a good-nonsuspect / bad-suspect bit.

In principle, whether or not an exponent has been factored is entirely independent of LL test results. You could theoretically perform a redundant LL test on an exponent that's already been factored, just like you can perform a (third or higher) redundant LL test on an exponent that's already been double-checked.

[QUOTE=GP2;446764]The most straightforward thing to do, I think, would be just to have two separate status fields: factored/not factored on the one hand, and unverified (unknown)/unverified (suspect)/verified (good)/verified (bad).

Or maybe implemented as three bit flags in a single field: a factored/not factored bit, a verified/unverified bit, and a good-nonsuspect / bad-suspect bit.
[/QUOTE]

All true, but I'm more interested in whatever is [I]easier[/I] to implement. :smile:

[QUOTE]In principle, whether or not an exponent has been factored is entirely independent of LL test results. You could theoretically perform a redundant LL test on an exponent that's already been factored, just like you can perform a (third or higher) redundant LL test on an exponent that's already been double-checked.[/QUOTE]

True enough. In fact I did just that, doing a double or triple check for a bunch of (small) exponents that had one (or more, mismatching) tests done but a factor was found before it was ever verified. I didn't do a lot of those, just a few in cases where I thought it might help me figure out if the CPU in question on that first test was good or bad. I suppose you could say that a test like that isn't redundant at all... I mean, it doesn't do anything for saying if it's composite or not since we already know, but it is useful in determining system stability. I think I already got all of the easy pickings in there where there were 2 mismatched LL results plus a factor found later. Might be some stragglers in the larger sizes that I didn't feel like tussling with.

Been a while since I've had an updated list of strategic double-checks... there's a few more juicy ones in here among the others. Those smaller ones could go fast so be sure to check if they're already assigned automatically to someone else:

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39786697 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39786697,71,1
40262413 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40262413,72,1
40262713 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40262713,72,1
40266763 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40266763,72,1
40661147 3 1 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=40661147,72,1
41388463 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=41388463,72,1
41389217 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=41389217,72,1
43765103 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43765103,72,1
44087893 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44087893,72,1
45507389 3 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=45507389,72,1
45752309 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=45752309,72,1
45752363 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=45752363,72,1
46265221 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=46265221,72,1
46268533 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=46268533,72,1
46270933 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=46270933,72,1
46276519 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=46276519,72,1
46572671 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=46572671,72,1
46572683 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=46572683,72,1
47138303 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47138303,72,1
47578967 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47578967,72,1
47891231 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=47891231,72,1
47912729 3 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=47912729,72,1
47926313 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=47926313,72,1
47928043 3 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=47928043,72,1
48338461 3 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=48338461,72,1
48341663 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=48341663,72,1
48341701 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=48341701,72,1
48893629 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=48893629,72,1
49327951 2 1 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=49327951,72,1
51770111 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=51770111,73,1
52690333 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=52690333,73,1
53026327 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=53026327,73,1
54485099 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=54485099,73,1
54698087 4 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=54698087,73,1
55131469 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=55131469,73,1
55152697 4 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=55152697,73,1
55154819 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=55154819,73,1
57672383 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=57672383,73,1
61268057 6 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=61268057,74,1
61448633 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=61448633,74,1
61669481 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=61669481,74,1
61692343 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=61692343,74,1
61759429 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=61759429,74,1
61806397 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=61806397,74,1
61843919 3 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=61843919,74,1
62393477 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=62393477,74,1
62408923 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=62408923,74,1
62634991 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=62634991,74,1
62950673 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=62950673,74,1
62950981 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=62950981,74,1
63071573 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=63071573,74,1
63989999 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=63989999,74,1
67300973 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=67300973,75,1
68383009 2 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=68383009,74,1
68633023 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=68633023,75,1
68644171 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=68644171,75,1
69155773 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=69155773,74,1
69196801 2 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=69196801,74,1
69298043 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=69298043,74,1
69505729 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=69505729,74,1
69561731 2 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=69561731,74,1
69892819 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=69892819,75,1
69892843 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=69892843,75,1
70011859 5 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=70011859,75,1
70645997 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=70645997,74,1
71606147 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=71606147,75,1
72013369 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=72013369,75,1
72089309 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=72089309,75,1
72116813 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=72116813,75,1
72206119 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=72206119,75,1
72237013 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=72237013,75,1
72362197 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=72362197,75,1
72430037 2 0 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=72430037,75,1
72502607 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=72502607,75,1
72504101 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=72504101,75,1
72512819 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=72512819,75,1
72516403 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=72516403,75,1
72544091 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=72544091,75,1
72642907 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=72642907,75,1
72702677 2 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=72702677,75,1
72703997 2 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=72703997,75,1
72709957 2 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=72709957,75,1
72946403 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=72946403,75,1
73072903 2 1 1 3 4 0 DoubleCheck=73072903,75,1
73076551 2 1 1 3 4 0 DoubleCheck=73076551,75,1
73138057 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=73138057,75,1
73153349 2 1 1 3 4 0 DoubleCheck=73153349,75,1
73176937 2 1 1 3 4 0 DoubleCheck=73176937,75,1
74022937 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=74022937,75,1
75219259 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=75219259,75,1
77334373 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=77334373,75,1
77458261 3 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=77458261,75,1
77531803 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=77531803,75,1[/CODE]

I took these:

[CODE]39786697 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39786697,71,1
40262413 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40262413,72,1
40262713 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40262713,72,1
40266763 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40266763,72,1
40661147 3 1 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=40661147,72,1
41388463 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=41388463,72,1
41389217 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=41389217,72,1
43765103 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43765103,72,1
[/CODE]

I took all below 50M.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;446867]

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
51770111 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=51770111,73,1
52690333 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=52690333,73,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I took these two from the latest list.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;446867]Been a while since I've had an updated list of strategic double-checks...

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
53026327 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=53026327,73,1
54485099 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=54485099,73,1
54698087 4 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=54698087,73,1
55131469 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=55131469,73,1
55152697 4 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=55152697,73,1
55154819 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=55154819,73,1
57672383 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=57672383,73,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Grabbed and enqueued these... will move 'em to a faster machine in a few days

Hm, seems that AirSquirrels completes checks from the last list although others have assigned them, for example:

46276519
46572671
46572683

[QUOTE=rudi_m;447324]Hm, seems that AirSquirrels completes checks from the last list although others have assigned them, for example:

46276519
46572671
46572683[/QUOTE]

That may have been my fault. I discovered that about 20% of my GPU machines had been imaged with bad permissions on the folder used by my collection script to cache results to be submitted to the server. As a result, about 500 results from the past 4 months had been completed but not submitted. I dumped all those results in yesterday, but some may have been reassigned since.

Anyone want a freebee?
 

38276921 C - Mismatch 0016487C61BFE6__

[QUOTE=petrw1;448049]38276921 C - Mismatch 0016487C61BFE6__[/QUOTE]

Incidentally, we're close to getting caught up with the needed triple-checks.

I had picked up the rest of the unassigned stuff a couple weeks back, but then each day there are new ones, plus assigned TC's that expire and become available.

Right now I'm picking up what I can, when I can, based on the age of the 2nd check, so I can try and grab whatever expired from the previous person.

At the rate new ones show up though, I'm not 100% sure I'd be able to not only catch up on existing stuff but also keep up with new mismatches. AirSquirrels is a HUGE help with that, but he has a maintenance period coming up.

If anyone is interesting in participating in doing TC's, I can generate a list of exponents for you to grab on a first-come/first-serve basis. You'll have to do your own research to make sure it's not one you've already done a previous check. :smile:

Here's the current list of unassigned stuff, ordered in ascending date of when the last result came in (they start from Nov. 18th). The first 5 are actually quad checks where I've already done one of them. 131 total. Again, just check and see if a) it's already assigned, and b) you didn't do a previous check.

[CODE]WorkToDo
DoubleCheck=54318127,73,1
DoubleCheck=59786957,73,1
DoubleCheck=64242329,74,1
DoubleCheck=49881941,72,1
DoubleCheck=45445121,72,1
DoubleCheck=43638367,72,1
DoubleCheck=43232869,72,1
DoubleCheck=43133747,72,1
DoubleCheck=41102669,72,1
DoubleCheck=43210469,72,1
DoubleCheck=40097719,72,1
DoubleCheck=39266443,71,1
DoubleCheck=61448633,75,1
DoubleCheck=51318349,73,1
DoubleCheck=69614147,74,1
DoubleCheck=74636599,75,1
DoubleCheck=74574139,75,1
DoubleCheck=42920123,72,1
DoubleCheck=40862399,72,1
DoubleCheck=42920041,72,1
DoubleCheck=45296761,72,1
DoubleCheck=76134293,75,1
DoubleCheck=62393477,75,1
DoubleCheck=45888691,72,1
DoubleCheck=41082403,72,1
DoubleCheck=61806397,75,1
DoubleCheck=61843919,75,1
DoubleCheck=50172107,73,1
DoubleCheck=48298699,72,1
DoubleCheck=46463257,72,1
DoubleCheck=48667937,72,1
DoubleCheck=41158651,72,1
DoubleCheck=46179047,72,1
DoubleCheck=73570589,75,1
DoubleCheck=48466687,72,1
DoubleCheck=69332441,75,1
DoubleCheck=41993507,72,1
DoubleCheck=43320517,72,1
DoubleCheck=73300099,75,1
DoubleCheck=68002423,74,1
DoubleCheck=43034917,72,1
DoubleCheck=39258293,71,1
DoubleCheck=41057411,72,1
DoubleCheck=39271709,71,1
DoubleCheck=40706311,72,1
DoubleCheck=43176281,72,1
DoubleCheck=38872957,71,1
DoubleCheck=78185801,75,1
DoubleCheck=40641353,72,1
DoubleCheck=78185927,75,1
DoubleCheck=62950673,75,1
DoubleCheck=63071573,75,1
DoubleCheck=43282147,72,1
DoubleCheck=41226821,72,1
DoubleCheck=75256669,75,1
DoubleCheck=38836363,71,1
DoubleCheck=70221007,75,1
DoubleCheck=51427267,73,1
DoubleCheck=40694833,72,1
DoubleCheck=48725869,72,1
DoubleCheck=39022001,71,1
DoubleCheck=49300829,72,1
DoubleCheck=43522883,72,1
DoubleCheck=39353543,71,1
DoubleCheck=41157967,72,1
DoubleCheck=43475557,72,1
DoubleCheck=43491731,72,1
DoubleCheck=69155773,75,1
DoubleCheck=43512191,72,1
DoubleCheck=43512149,72,1
DoubleCheck=39252061,71,1
DoubleCheck=43521901,72,1
DoubleCheck=66319829,75,1
DoubleCheck=39275507,71,1
DoubleCheck=51515489,73,1
DoubleCheck=48177821,72,1
DoubleCheck=46857427,72,1
DoubleCheck=74638393,75,1
DoubleCheck=41357033,72,1
DoubleCheck=50461589,73,1
DoubleCheck=40150037,72,1
DoubleCheck=39268259,74,1
DoubleCheck=54485099,75,1
DoubleCheck=41359441,72,1
DoubleCheck=41174027,72,1
DoubleCheck=47081401,72,1
DoubleCheck=39117359,71,1
DoubleCheck=42732059,72,1
DoubleCheck=39400903,71,1
DoubleCheck=41310547,72,1
DoubleCheck=67300973,75,1
DoubleCheck=45089279,72,1
DoubleCheck=76176511,75,1
DoubleCheck=40150241,72,1
DoubleCheck=43044611,72,1
DoubleCheck=43223903,72,1
DoubleCheck=43351739,72,1
DoubleCheck=47578967,72,1
DoubleCheck=69694483,74,1
DoubleCheck=51657421,73,1
DoubleCheck=42718699,72,1
DoubleCheck=41373383,72,1
DoubleCheck=51616883,73,1
DoubleCheck=75694397,75,1
DoubleCheck=40646569,72,1
DoubleCheck=51979289,73,1
DoubleCheck=51969311,73,1
DoubleCheck=41430119,72,1
DoubleCheck=77033129,75,1
DoubleCheck=69892819,75,1
DoubleCheck=46853671,72,1
DoubleCheck=43210367,72,1
DoubleCheck=51811811,73,1
DoubleCheck=46702657,72,1
DoubleCheck=43113349,72,1
DoubleCheck=48779147,72,1
DoubleCheck=75703063,75,1
DoubleCheck=73138057,75,1
DoubleCheck=72089309,75,1
DoubleCheck=44837021,72,1
DoubleCheck=60203309,74,1
DoubleCheck=41428249,72,1
DoubleCheck=41428601,72,1
DoubleCheck=66437729,74,1
DoubleCheck=52004809,73,1
DoubleCheck=40641017,72,1
DoubleCheck=41727341,72,1
DoubleCheck=41117789,72,1
DoubleCheck=41468969,72,1
DoubleCheck=43463477,72,1
DoubleCheck=39260279,71,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;448087]Here's the current list of unassigned stuff, ordered in ascending date of when the last result came in (they start from Nov. 18th). ... [/QUOTE]

All below 45M are assigned by me and others. (60% of them were already assigned).

I grabbed everything below 69.5M from the triple check list.

I've also grabbed every double check from the thread below 73000471. Here are the remaining double checks:

DoubleCheck=73000471,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000549,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000561,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000583,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000607,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000619,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000639,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000687,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000883,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000913,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000927,75,1
DoubleCheck=73001119,75,1
DoubleCheck=73003673,75,1
DoubleCheck=73116257,75,1
DoubleCheck=73116607,75,1
DoubleCheck=73135091,75,1
DoubleCheck=73139081,75,1
DoubleCheck=73143079,75,1
DoubleCheck=73143311,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146001,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146041,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146043,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146079,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146841,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146901,75,1
DoubleCheck=73147051,75,1
DoubleCheck=73148011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73385537,75,1
DoubleCheck=73385681,75,1
DoubleCheck=73446011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73469003,75,1
DoubleCheck=73469057,75,1
DoubleCheck=73477013,75,1
DoubleCheck=73481381,75,1
DoubleCheck=73491073,75,1
DoubleCheck=73499077,75,1
DoubleCheck=73566947,75,1
DoubleCheck=73647019,75,1
DoubleCheck=73648027,75,1
DoubleCheck=73649033,75,1
DoubleCheck=73649089,75,1
DoubleCheck=73659077,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692041,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692083,75,1
DoubleCheck=73694801,75,1
DoubleCheck=73697053,75,1
DoubleCheck=73697069,75,1
DoubleCheck=73698103,75,1
DoubleCheck=74064449,75,1
DoubleCheck=74698067,75,1
DoubleCheck=74953217,75,1
DoubleCheck=75015701,75,1
DoubleCheck=75015803,75,1
DoubleCheck=75161209,75,1
DoubleCheck=75477893,75,1
DoubleCheck=76006829,75,1
DoubleCheck=76077787,75,1
DoubleCheck=76141001,75,1
DoubleCheck=76193773,75,1
DoubleCheck=77187083,75,1
DoubleCheck=77187181,75,1
DoubleCheck=77888123,75,1

And the remaining triple checks:

DoubleCheck=69505729,75,1
DoubleCheck=69614147,75,1
DoubleCheck=69694483,75,1
DoubleCheck=69892819,75,1
DoubleCheck=70221007,75,1
DoubleCheck=72089309,75,1
DoubleCheck=73138057,75,1
DoubleCheck=73300099,75,1
DoubleCheck=73570589,75,1
DoubleCheck=74574139,75,1
DoubleCheck=74636599,75,1
DoubleCheck=74638393,75,1
DoubleCheck=75256669,75,1
DoubleCheck=75694397,75,1
DoubleCheck=75703063,75,1
DoubleCheck=76134293,75,1
DoubleCheck=76176511,75,1
DoubleCheck=77033129,75,1
DoubleCheck=77334373,75,1

I suspect a lot of the DC I grabbed to need a TC.

Adding to my worktodo from what I can from the triple check list. Looks like I was the double checker on a lot of those. The last one on the list
DoubleCheck=77334373,75,1
is still in progress by me as a double check.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;448189]I've also grabbed every double check from the thread below 73000471. Here are the remaining double checks:

DoubleCheck=73000471,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000549,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000561,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000583,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000607,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000619,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000639,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000687,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000883,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000913,75,1
DoubleCheck=73000927,75,1
DoubleCheck=73001119,75,1
DoubleCheck=73003673,75,1
DoubleCheck=73116257,75,1
DoubleCheck=73116607,75,1
DoubleCheck=73135091,75,1
DoubleCheck=73139081,75,1
DoubleCheck=73143079,75,1
DoubleCheck=73143311,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146001,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146041,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146043,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146079,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146841,75,1
DoubleCheck=73146901,75,1
DoubleCheck=73147051,75,1
DoubleCheck=73148011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73385537,75,1
DoubleCheck=73385681,75,1
DoubleCheck=73446011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73469003,75,1
DoubleCheck=73469057,75,1
DoubleCheck=73477013,75,1
DoubleCheck=73481381,75,1
DoubleCheck=73491073,75,1
DoubleCheck=73499077,75,1
DoubleCheck=73566947,75,1
DoubleCheck=73647019,75,1
DoubleCheck=73648027,75,1
DoubleCheck=73649033,75,1
DoubleCheck=73649089,75,1
DoubleCheck=73659077,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692011,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692041,75,1
DoubleCheck=73692083,75,1
DoubleCheck=73694801,75,1
DoubleCheck=73697053,75,1
DoubleCheck=73697069,75,1
DoubleCheck=73698103,75,1
DoubleCheck=74064449,75,1
DoubleCheck=74698067,75,1
DoubleCheck=74953217,75,1
DoubleCheck=75015701,75,1
DoubleCheck=75015803,75,1
DoubleCheck=75161209,75,1
DoubleCheck=75477893,75,1
DoubleCheck=76006829,75,1
DoubleCheck=76077787,75,1
DoubleCheck=76141001,75,1
DoubleCheck=76193773,75,1
DoubleCheck=77187083,75,1
DoubleCheck=77187181,75,1
DoubleCheck=77888123,75,1

...snip[/QUOTE]

Added these 63 Doublechecks to my worktodo files.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;448189]snip...
And the remaining triple checks:


DoubleCheck=69614147,75,1
DoubleCheck=69694483,75,1

DoubleCheck=70221007,75,1


DoubleCheck=73300099,75,1
DoubleCheck=73570589,75,1

DoubleCheck=74636599,75,1



DoubleCheck=75703063,75,1



DoubleCheck=77334373,75,1

[/QUOTE]

These are the triple checks I'm working on, except the last one, its just a regular doublecheck at this time.

A few more TC have popped up. Various people need a TC of:

DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M41389217"]41389217[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M47912729"]47912729[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M48341663"]48341663[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M55154819"]55154819[/url],75,1

And endless_mike needs a TC of:

DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M69505729"]69505729[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M69892819"]69892819[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M69892843"]69892843[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M72089309"]72089309[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M72116813"]72116813[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M73138057"]73138057[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M73138057"]73138057[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M74574139"]74574139[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M74638393"]74638393[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M75256669"]75256669[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M75694397"]75694397[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M76134293"]76134293[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M76176511"]76176511[/url],75,1
DoubleCheck=[url="http://www.mersenne.org/M77033129"]77033129[/url],75,1

There are no double checks available that I'm aware of.

Here is a triple which has sat for a while unassigned. I am pretty confident of the result I turned in, but it is nice to know.

DoubleCheck=41174027,72,1

[QUOTE=kladner;448407]Here is a triple which has sat for a while unassigned. I am pretty confident of the result I turned in, but it is nice to know.

DoubleCheck=41174027,72,1[/QUOTE]

LOL... I wouldn't call 8 days as "sat for a while", but then I've been doing triple checks lately where the last one done was from 2008-2010 so I'm a little biased. :smile:

Actually that 41M range is in category 2, which is a kind of twilight zone for exponents... the "cool kids" are doing cat 0 or 1, and the majority are doing cat 4. Cat 2 and 3 don't get a whole lot of love.

If it's still available when I finish my current list, I'll probably get it then, but I do see that it was already picked up on Dec 1 (it was probably in that list I posted).

OK. Thanks! I only ran a couple of 41Ms because of a hardware change which bumped me out of Cat 1. It's no big deal, just the first mismatch I've seen with the current hardware.

Most of my current DC assignments seem to be from 2008-2009, as well. It wasn't that long ago that some were from 2006.

New list of strategic double checks...

This is a batch of the lowest available exponent from any machine that could use an additional test to see if it's trending bad/good. They might have at least one bad and zero good, or have at least 4x as many bad as good.

Hopefully this will move some of these into the "yeah, I'm really bad" category for further checks.

[CODE]Exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39838349 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39838349,71,1
40401799 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=40401799,72,1
41106061 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41106061,72,1
41401387 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41401387,72,1
41609807 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=41609807,72,1
42138947 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42138947,72,1
42206029 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=42206029,72,1
42222737 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=42222737,72,1
42402643 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42402643,72,1
42495941 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42495941,72,1
42597199 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42597199,72,1
42652849 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42652849,72,1
43291471 3 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=43291471,72,1
44313317 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44313317,72,1
44315417 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44315417,72,1
44317969 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44317969,72,1
44522869 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44522869,72,1
44918891 2 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=44918891,72,1
45110059 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=45110059,72,1
46246819 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=46246819,72,1
46275709 1 0 4 0 3 1 DoubleCheck=46275709,72,1
46397587 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=46397587,72,1
46413677 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=46413677,72,1
46924121 1 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=46924121,72,1
47166023 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47166023,72,1
47303419 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=47303419,72,1
48055391 1 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=48055391,72,1
48680693 1 0 11 0 11 0 DoubleCheck=48680693,72,1
49111091 2 0 17 0 17 0 DoubleCheck=49111091,72,1
49550401 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=49550401,72,1
50095169 1 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=50095169,73,1
50160289 6 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=50160289,73,1
50342911 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=50342911,73,1
50478907 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=50478907,73,1
50708429 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=50708429,73,1
50724059 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=50724059,73,1
50880749 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=50880749,73,1
51881189 1 0 18 0 18 0 DoubleCheck=51881189,73,1
52022863 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=52022863,73,1
52125937 1 0 38 0 38 0 DoubleCheck=52125937,73,1
52663921 1 0 26 0 26 0 DoubleCheck=52663921,73,1
53200051 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=53200051,73,1
53335619 1 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=53335619,73,1
57512333 2 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=57512333,73,1
57920383 1 0 11 0 11 0 DoubleCheck=57920383,73,1
58311787 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=58311787,74,1
59735119 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=59735119,73,1
59816573 1 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=59816573,73,1
59830237 1 0 19 0 19 0 DoubleCheck=59830237,73,1
60015983 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=60015983,74,1
60442601 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=60442601,74,1
60610987 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=60610987,74,1
61662833 1 0 25 0 25 0 DoubleCheck=61662833,74,1
63726797 1 0 10 0 10 0 DoubleCheck=63726797,74,1
64039441 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=64039441,74,1
64070173 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=64070173,74,1
64330831 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=64330831,74,1
64798241 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=64798241,74,1
66101753 1 0 10 0 10 0 DoubleCheck=66101753,75,1
66292871 1 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=66292871,74,1
68845219 1 0 11 0 11 0 DoubleCheck=68845219,74,1
68942537 1 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=68942537,74,1
69531503 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=69531503,74,1
70444831 1 0 1 3 4 0 DoubleCheck=70444831,75,1
72144109 1 0 6 1 7 0 DoubleCheck=72144109,75,1
72995479 2 0 1 7 7 1 DoubleCheck=72995479,75,1
73614487 16 3 9 3 9 3 DoubleCheck=73614487,75,1
74658247 1 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=74658247,75,1
74991149 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=74991149,75,1
75194293 13 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75194293,75,1
75295823 2 0 8 0 8 0 DoubleCheck=75295823,75,1
75531641 8 0 3 3 3 3 DoubleCheck=75531641,75,1
75649307 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=75649307,75,1
75803747 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=75803747,75,1
76104901 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=76104901,75,1
76109987 3 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=76109987,75,1
76244171 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=76244171,75,1
76283707 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76283707,75,1
76460893 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76460893,75,1
76989659 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76989659,75,1
77456543 3 0 4 0 2 2 DoubleCheck=77456543,75,1
77601323 4 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=77601323,75,1
77649757 1 0 3 1 4 0 DoubleCheck=77649757,75,1[/CODE]

I've taken every exponent M49550401 and below

I took the other ones below 60M.

New list
 

Here's a new Christmas edition of strategic double-checks. Enjoy!

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
42302959 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42302959,72,1
42402163 4 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42402163,72,1
43194623 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=43194623,72,1
43349083 4 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43349083,72,1
44209721 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44209721,72,1
44753479 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44753479,72,1
45268747 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=45268747,72,1
45272189 7 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=45272189,72,1
45722167 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=45722167,72,1
48601447 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=48601447,72,1
50261041 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=50261041,73,1
50419949 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=50419949,73,1
52303397 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=52303397,73,1
52551341 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=52551341,73,1
57167093 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=57167093,73,1
58397071 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=58397071,73,1
61540469 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=61540469,74,1
67538789 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=67538789,75,1
67548979 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=67548979,75,1
70753703 0 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=70753703,75,1
70818247 0 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=70818247,75,1
72115763 0 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=72115763,75,1
72157471 0 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=72157471,75,1
72203959 0 0 6 0 5 1 DoubleCheck=72203959,75,1
72995479 0 0 1 4 5 0 DoubleCheck=72995479,75,1
72995609 0 0 1 4 5 0 DoubleCheck=72995609,75,1
73150223 0 0 1 4 5 0 DoubleCheck=73150223,75,1
73313437 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313437,75,1
73313629 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313629,75,1
73313731 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313731,75,1
73313833 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313833,75,1
73313897 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313897,75,1
73547863 0 0 1 4 5 0 DoubleCheck=73547863,75,1
73823377 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=73823377,75,1
73827983 0 0 0 6 6 0 DoubleCheck=73827983,75,1
73828087 0 0 0 6 6 0 DoubleCheck=73828087,75,1
73828141 0 0 0 6 6 0 DoubleCheck=73828141,75,1
73828177 0 0 0 6 6 0 DoubleCheck=73828177,75,1
73828301 0 0 0 6 6 0 DoubleCheck=73828301,75,1
73954633 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=73954633,75,1
74706031 0 0 1 4 5 0 DoubleCheck=74706031,75,1
74944201 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=74944201,75,1
75043789 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=75043789,75,1
75043897 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=75043897,75,1
75044003 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=75044003,75,1
75085343 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=75085343,75,1
75123989 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=75123989,75,1
75194293 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75194293,75,1
75348619 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=75348619,75,1
75365051 6 0 0 7 4 3 DoubleCheck=75365051,75,1
75365057 0 0 0 4 1 3 DoubleCheck=75365057,75,1
75404257 0 0 0 6 6 0 DoubleCheck=75404257,75,1
75531641 1 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=75531641,75,1
75543151 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=75543151,75,1
75786521 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75786521,75,1
75822031 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75822031,75,1
75822041 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75822041,75,1
75822151 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75822151,75,1
76077979 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76077979,75,1
76367131 1 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=76367131,75,1
76397383 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76397383,75,1
76686409 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76686409,75,1
76799141 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76799141,75,1
76823573 0 0 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=76823573,75,1
76893769 0 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=76893769,75,1
76956941 0 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=76956941,75,1
76961371 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76961371,75,1
77006779 0 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=77006779,75,1
77374679 0 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=77374679,75,1
77393269 0 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=77393269,75,1
77481323 0 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=77481323,75,1
77489147 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=77489147,75,1
78931007 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=78931007,75,1[/CODE]

Taking the top ten for the hungry maw of my GTX1080

Taking the remaining assignments below 61M.

[QUOTE=fivemack;449919]Taking the top ten for the hungry maw of my GTX1080[/QUOTE]

I don't see assignments for these. Did you queue them?

I grabbed a few dozen more assignments, including all the suspect results. Here's what's left:

DoubleCheck=73313437,75,1
DoubleCheck=73313629,75,1
DoubleCheck=73313731,75,1
DoubleCheck=73313833,75,1
DoubleCheck=73313897,75,1
DoubleCheck=73823377,75,1
DoubleCheck=73954633,75,1
DoubleCheck=74658247,75,1
DoubleCheck=74706031,75,1
DoubleCheck=74944201,75,1
DoubleCheck=74991149,75,1
DoubleCheck=75043789,75,1
DoubleCheck=75043897,75,1
DoubleCheck=75044003,75,1
DoubleCheck=75085343,75,1
DoubleCheck=75123989,75,1
DoubleCheck=75194293,75,1
DoubleCheck=75295823,75,1
DoubleCheck=75348619,75,1
DoubleCheck=75531641,75,1
DoubleCheck=75543151,75,1
DoubleCheck=75649307,75,1
DoubleCheck=75786521,75,1
DoubleCheck=75803747,75,1
DoubleCheck=75822031,75,1
DoubleCheck=75822041,75,1
DoubleCheck=75822151,75,1
DoubleCheck=76077979,75,1
DoubleCheck=76367131,75,1
DoubleCheck=76397383,75,1
DoubleCheck=76686409,75,1
DoubleCheck=76799141,75,1
DoubleCheck=76823573,75,1
DoubleCheck=76893769,75,1
DoubleCheck=76956941,75,1
DoubleCheck=76961371,75,1
DoubleCheck=77006779,75,1
DoubleCheck=77374679,75,1
DoubleCheck=77393269,75,1
DoubleCheck=77481323,75,1
DoubleCheck=77489147,75,1
DoubleCheck=78931007,75,1

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;450071]I don't see assignments for these. Did you queue them?[/QUOTE]

Just copy-and-pasted into worktodo.txt in the CUDALucas directory.

42302959, 42402163, 43194623, 43349083 are verified, I'm getting 2.48ms per iteration at FFT size 2304K so about six tests a week.

[QUOTE=fivemack;450209]Just copy-and-pasted into worktodo.txt in the CUDALucas directory.

42302959, 42402163, 43194623, 43349083 are verified, I'm getting 2.48ms per iteration at FFT size 2304K so about six tests a week.[/QUOTE]

FYI, if you don't get assignments on them, there's a fair chance they'd be assigned to someone else before you finish. Especially if they're in the category 4 churn zone.

Or, if not assigned, they'll just show up in the unassigned lists I generate next time and someone else might manually pick them up to work on.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;450402]FYI, if you don't get assignments on them, there's a fair chance they'd be assigned to someone else before you finish. Especially if they're in the category 4 churn zone.

Or, if not assigned, they'll just show up in the unassigned lists I generate next time and someone else might manually pick them up to work on.[/QUOTE]

How do I go about getting assignments on them, when cudalucas doesn't talk to the assignment server - do I need to start a disposable mprime, ask for exactly those exponents, then throw away the mprime and leave the GTX1080 to its work?

(Ah, OK, I can just go to mersenne.org : Manual Testing : Assignments and ask for a double-check assignment from the range p,p ; that has worked for everything except 45272189, which appears to be unreserved but I guess is in an important zone. Hey, accidental triple-checks aren't so bad)

[QUOTE=fivemack;450406]How do I go about getting assignments on them, when cudalucas doesn't talk to the assignment server - do I need to start a disposable mprime, ask for exactly those exponents, then throw away the mprime and leave the GTX1080 to its work?

(Ah, OK, I can just go to mersenne.org : Manual Testing : Assignments and ask for a double-check assignment from the range p,p ; that has worked for everything except 45272189, which appears to be unreserved but I guess is in an important zone. Hey, accidental triple-checks aren't so bad)[/QUOTE]
Use an instance of Prime95, (or, I assume) mprime. Put the assignments in worktodo.txt, and have P95 "call home."

[QUOTE=fivemack;450406]How do I go about getting assignments on them, when cudalucas doesn't talk to the assignment server - do I need to start a disposable mprime, ask for exactly those exponents, then throw away the mprime and leave the GTX1080 to its work?

(Ah, OK, I can just go to mersenne.org : Manual Testing : Assignments and ask for a double-check assignment from the range p,p ; that has worked for everything except 45272189, which appears to be unreserved but I guess is in an important zone. Hey, accidental triple-checks aren't so bad)[/QUOTE]

Oh, yeah, if you're not using a Prime95/mprime, it is funky.

I kind of wish it were easier to manually reserve *specific* exponents from that page on the site. Right now though, even if you choose a single exponent you want, it still looks at the category rules (and some categories aren't available to manual assignments at all since no machine info is available in those cases).

I'm spoiled because I can reserve them in bulk (or I'd generate assignments for AirSquirrels). But then we're talking about doing a couple hundred at a time, and I have to specify things like the user (and cpu id in the case of AirSquirrels since he likes to keep the Nvidia and AMD work separated in reports).

Speaking of which, I've got single digit temperatures for cooling and winter sun for power and I'm ready for some LL work!

Since triples are caught up maybe we can start making dents in that 'never had a double check, has more than one result' pile?

[QUOTE=airsquirrels;450551]Speaking of which, I've got single digit temperatures for cooling and winter sun for power and I'm ready for some LL work!
[/QUOTE]
Have you still got any damaged Titans, or you changed your mind? :razz:

[QUOTE=airsquirrels;450551]Since triples are caught up maybe we can start making dents in that 'never had a double check, has more than one result' pile?[/QUOTE]

I would take ~300 of those in the 42M+ range.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;450562]I would take ~300 of those in the 42M+ range.[/QUOTE]

I just emailed (hopefully) a worktodo with 300 assignments for you.

Putting one together now for AirSquirrels.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;450588]I just emailed (hopefully) a worktodo with 300 assignments for you.[/QUOTE]

Got it. These should be done in about three months.

New batch
 

All of the fun easy pickings have pretty much been done, but I still find some interesting ones. They tend towards the larger sizes though, but if you don't mind, here they are.

This list has anything with a bad/good ration of 2.5 or more either for that specific one-month period, or if they had zero good (and zero or more bad) for that month, it's a 2.5+ bad/good for their total results. That'll explain why in some cases the bad/good shown is less than 2.5. :smile:

Enjoy!
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39535031 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39535031,71,1
43519153 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43519153,72,1
46652989 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=46652989,72,1
52229663 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=52229663,73,1
53116621 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=53116621,73,1
55248779 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=55248779,73,1
55796291 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=55796291,73,1
55923949 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=55923949,73,1
55981439 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=55981439,73,1
57189409 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=57189409,73,1
57212899 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=57212899,73,1
57494869 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=57494869,73,1
58213751 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=58213751,73,1
59116583 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=59116583,73,1
59670859 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=59670859,74,1
60080407 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=60080407,74,1
60160013 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=60160013,74,1
60194737 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=60194737,74,1
60777341 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=60777341,74,1
62206849 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=62206849,74,1
62481227 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=62481227,74,1
64876687 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=64876687,74,1
69075553 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=69075553,74,1
69260857 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=69260857,74,1
69675127 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=69675127,74,1
70175191 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=70175191,75,1
70216339 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=70216339,75,1
70284523 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=70284523,75,1
70334857 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=70334857,75,1
70345481 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70345481,75,1
70398491 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70398491,75,1
70448311 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70448311,75,1
70458749 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=70458749,75,1
71322469 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=71322469,75,1
71443391 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=71443391,75,1
71477669 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=71477669,75,1
71496833 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=71496833,75,1
71610949 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=71610949,75,1
72032447 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=72032447,75,1
73313437 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313437,75,1
73313629 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313629,75,1
73313731 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313731,75,1
73313833 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313833,75,1
73313897 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=73313897,75,1
73823377 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=73823377,75,1
73954633 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=73954633,75,1
74122441 3 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=74122441,75,1
74131087 6 0 0 4 4 0 DoubleCheck=74131087,75,1
74590297 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=74590297,75,1
74771029 0 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=74771029,75,1
75123989 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=75123989,75,1
75194293 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75194293,75,1
75219217 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75219217,75,1
75219791 0 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=75219791,76,1
75348619 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=75348619,75,1
75431189 3 0 0 3 2 1 DoubleCheck=75431189,75,1
75431981 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=75431981,75,1
75463447 4 0 1 4 2 3 DoubleCheck=75463447,75,1
75531641 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=75531641,75,1
75543151 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=75543151,75,1
75582607 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=75582607,75,1
75786521 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75786521,75,1
75822031 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75822031,75,1
75822041 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75822041,75,1
75822151 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75822151,75,1
75849821 6 0 1 2 2 1 DoubleCheck=75849821,75,1
75850937 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=75850937,75,1
76039549 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76039549,75,1
76077979 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76077979,75,1
76290979 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=76290979,75,1
76367131 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=76367131,75,1
76397383 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76397383,75,1
76499807 3 0 0 3 2 1 DoubleCheck=76499807,75,1
76686409 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76686409,75,1
76686917 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=76686917,75,1
76719659 3 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=76719659,75,1
76798919 0 0 7 0 7 0 DoubleCheck=76798919,75,1
76799141 0 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76799141,75,1
76823573 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76823573,75,1
76893769 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=76893769,75,1
76932551 6 0 1 2 2 1 DoubleCheck=76932551,75,1
76949281 0 0 4 1 5 0 DoubleCheck=76949281,75,1
76956941 0 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=76956941,75,1
77006779 0 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=77006779,75,1
77037809 0 0 4 1 5 0 DoubleCheck=77037809,75,1
77065873 0 0 0 4 2 2 DoubleCheck=77065873,75,1
77093843 5 0 3 5 2 6 DoubleCheck=77093843,75,1
77113811 5 0 3 5 2 6 DoubleCheck=77113811,75,1
77173913 3 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=77173913,75,1
77250139 1 0 1 5 1 5 DoubleCheck=77250139,75,1
77352217 3 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=77352217,75,1
77365193 0 0 4 1 5 0 DoubleCheck=77365193,75,1
77374679 0 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=77374679,75,1
77393269 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=77393269,75,1
77462101 0 0 4 1 5 0 DoubleCheck=77462101,75,1
77473789 1 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=77473789,75,1
77481013 0 0 4 1 5 0 DoubleCheck=77481013,75,1
77481323 0 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=77481323,75,1
77492081 4 0 1 4 2 3 DoubleCheck=77492081,75,1
77498959 0 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=77498959,75,1
77500513 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=77500513,75,1
77504041 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=77504041,75,1
77504941 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=77504941,75,1
77535023 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=77535023,75,1
77539841 4 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=77539841,75,1
77542147 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=77542147,75,1
77542181 1 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=77542181,75,1
77550619 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=77550619,75,1
77562689 4 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=77562689,75,1
77568079 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=77568079,75,1
77600527 0 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=77600527,75,1
77664107 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=77664107,75,1
77811347 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=77811347,75,1
78023989 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=78023989,75,1
78187933 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=78187933,75,1[/CODE]

I took the first 6:

[CODE]39535031 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39535031,71,1
43519153 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43519153,72,1
46652989 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=46652989,72,1
52229663 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=52229663,73,1
53116621 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=53116621,73,1
55248779 0 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=55248779,73,1
[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;451896]All of the fun easy pickings have pretty much been done, but I still find some interesting ones. They tend towards the larger sizes though, but if you don't mind, here they are.
[/QUOTE]

I took all below 60M.

75431189 looks particularly interesting.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;452028]75431189 looks particularly interesting.[/QUOTE]

Oh yeah... that's right. I've been waiting for that one to get auto-assigned to someone for over a month now.

It's one of those false positives (almost surely) from user xolotl, thus the result not appearing since it's not a verified prime. :smile:

It must not be in a range where the anonymous users churn through.

What's the latest with the real-time–ish triple checks? Are you able to keep up?

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;452110]What's the latest with the real-time–ish triple checks? Are you able to keep up?[/QUOTE]

Eh, I keep getting caught up getting them assigned to me, but by the time I finish there's enough for another month's worth. I'd say it's like treading water.

I'm taking about half of the time away from the triple checks this month to catch back up with all the self-verified work people still stubbornly do. :smile:

I think it'll depend right now on how AirSquirrel's capacity is looking on whether or not we can get ahead of the curve finally on the triple-checking. I gave him a batch a few weeks back and I'm not sure if/when he'll be ready for more, so we'll see.

Right now there are something like 60'ish unassigned triple checks, all in the 60M-78M range.

New list
 

Here's a new list. It includes any machine with at least 1 bad result over it's lifetime, and zero good results over it's lifetime. Their lowest unverified exponent is listed which will give us a chance to test another one and see if we can manage to tally up another bad one, or maybe give them their first match.

You'll notice some of those have horrible bad/good ratios like M77093843 with 22 bad, zero good. Ouch! That's one of those machines from xolotl that keeps returning funky bad results with zero residues (even though it marks them composite). Honestly, I don't know why he hasn't looked into that more... really at this point, those particular machines are just wasting electricity in their tests since they're not giving good results, but maybe there'll be some useful data to come out of those failures. :smile:

[CODE]Exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
46952999 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=46952999,72,1
47139091 1 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=47139091,72,1
47438527 2 0 17 0 17 0 DoubleCheck=47438527,72,1
48064711 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48064711,72,1
48425581 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=48425581,72,1
50544443 1 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=50544443,73,1
51554759 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=51554759,73,1
52762331 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=52762331,73,1
54433193 1 0 11 0 11 0 DoubleCheck=54433193,73,1
59735153 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=59735153,73,1
60452317 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=60452317,74,1
64330897 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=64330897,74,1
64798553 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=64798553,74,1
66292903 2 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=66292903,74,1
69531577 1 0 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=69531577,74,1
71118629 2 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=71118629,75,1
72181381 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=72181381,75,1
72486703 2 0 5 1 5 1 DoubleCheck=72486703,75,1
74305061 1 0 56 0 56 0 DoubleCheck=74305061,75,1
74658247 1 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=74658247,75,1
74991149 1 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=74991149,75,1
75216997 2 0 1 3 4 0 DoubleCheck=75216997,75,1
75295823 2 0 8 0 8 0 DoubleCheck=75295823,75,1
75531641 15 0 2 3 5 0 DoubleCheck=75531641,75,1
75649307 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=75649307,75,1
75803747 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=75803747,75,1
76244177 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76244177,75,1
76322471 1 0 0 3 2 1 DoubleCheck=76322471,75,1
77030273 11 0 0 4 2 2 DoubleCheck=77030273,75,1
77093843 22 0 0 5 2 3 DoubleCheck=77093843,75,1
77250139 13 0 0 3 1 2 DoubleCheck=77250139,75,1
78391297 1 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=78391297,75,1
79569689 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=79569689,75,1
79640179 2 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=79640179,75,1
79748423 6 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=79748423,75,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;452886]Here's a new list.

[CODE]Exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
46952999 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=46952999,72,1
47139091 1 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=47139091,72,1
47438527 2 0 17 0 17 0 DoubleCheck=47438527,72,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I took these, the first 3 in the list.

I took the next 4:
48064711
48425581
50544443
51554759

I took all unassigned ones below 70M (also from the last list)

I got a mismatch with RangerNine's result on [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M46952999"]M46952999[/URL].

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;453597]I got a mismatch with RangerNine's result on [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M46952999"]M46952999[/URL].[/QUOTE]
I'll do the TC.

Queued. Registered.

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;453597]I got a mismatch with RangerNine's result on [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M46952999"]M46952999[/URL].[/QUOTE]
I matched your result. :smile:

[QUOTE=kladner;453842]I matched your result. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the quick TC, although I had little doubt my result was good. I got a match on my 2nd exponent, and am now working on the last exponent I took.

My system is still pretty new. DC and TC are the order of the day, anyway. Happy to return some favors done for me by others. It keeps check on my machine as well.

I would find it useful if we had a shared spreadsheet of what was needed to be done. There could be either one editor, or we could all edit out whatever we reserve for ourselves. Would this help anybody else?


[STRIKE]I will take the rest of the last list.[/STRIKE]

EDIT: Oh. It looks like they have already been assigned to "endless mike".

[QUOTE=Jayder;454101]


[STRIKE]I will take the rest of the last list.[/STRIKE]

EDIT: Oh. It looks like they have already been assigned to "endless mike".[/QUOTE]

If you want any of the last list that I added to my worktodo files, you're welcome to go ahead and take some. I just waited until I saw no movement for a while then assigned them. They'll probably end up needing triple checks at some point anyway.

[QUOTE=Jayder;454101]I would find it useful if we had a shared spreadsheet of what was needed to be done.[/QUOTE]

All of the ones that Madpoo posted recently have been taken.

If you want a few suggestions in the same vein(s) as the recent ones, you might try:

[CODE]
DoubleCheck=72280459,75,1
DoubleCheck=73985663,75,1
DoubleCheck=74306333,75,1
DoubleCheck=75295921,75,1
DoubleCheck=75499693,75,1
DoubleCheck=75499727,75,1
DoubleCheck=75952931,75,1
DoubleCheck=76280779,75,1
DoubleCheck=77429719,75,1
[/CODE]

[QUOTE=GP2;454191]All of the ones that Madpoo posted recently have been taken.[/QUOTE]

Correction, these four are still available (from p. 121)

[CODE]
DoubleCheck=75043789,75,1
DoubleCheck=75043897,75,1
DoubleCheck=75044003,75,1
DoubleCheck=75085343,75,1
[/CODE]

Updated list
 

Here's a new list of strategic double checks.

It's a look at the monthly counts of bad/good, but if they don't have a monthly stat it'll look at their lifetime bad/good and go from that.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
43354193 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=43354193,72,1
44636387 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44636387,72,1
49555217 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=49555217,72,1
50063149 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=50063149,73,1
50116567 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=50116567,73,1
50207089 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=50207089,73,1
50248349 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=50248349,73,1
50956921 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=50956921,73,1
52479409 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=52479409,73,1
53167397 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=53167397,73,1
53312419 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=53312419,73,1
53576399 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=53576399,73,1
53902309 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=53902309,73,1
54172997 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=54172997,73,1
54342941 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=54342941,74,1
54546623 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=54546623,73,1
54832861 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=54832861,73,1
54929573 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=54929573,73,1
54993871 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=54993871,73,1
54997711 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=54997711,73,1
55162199 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=55162199,73,1
55446901 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=55446901,73,1
55606333 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=55606333,73,1
56075501 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=56075501,73,1
56316941 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=56316941,73,1
56478473 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=56478473,73,1
57061139 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=57061139,73,1
57235117 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=57235117,73,1
57337289 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=57337289,73,1
57507347 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=57507347,73,1
57967187 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=57967187,73,1
58111421 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=58111421,73,1
58142111 0 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=58142111,73,1
58474907 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=58474907,73,1
59171429 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=59171429,73,1
59354567 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=59354567,73,1
59697929 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=59697929,73,1
60999739 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=60999739,74,1
61310531 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=61310531,74,1
61739537 7 3 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=61739537,74,1
62020999 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=62020999,74,1
62570987 7 3 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=62570987,74,1
69407521 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=69407521,74,1
69493517 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=69493517,74,1
69850153 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=69850153,74,1
69860083 1 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=69860083,74,1
70018517 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=70018517,75,1
70342609 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70342609,75,1
70345157 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70345157,75,1
70473253 1 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=70473253,75,1
71627189 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=71627189,75,1
72312973 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=72312973,75,1
72638711 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=72638711,75,1
72639263 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=72639263,75,1
72818147 0 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=72818147,75,1
73014467 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=73014467,75,1
73016393 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=73016393,75,1
73137319 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=73137319,75,1
73226059 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=73226059,75,1
73799381 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=73799381,75,1
73865689 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=73865689,75,1
73985663 1 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=73985663,75,1
74097173 1 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=74097173,75,1
74097571 0 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=74097571,75,1
74929783 0 0 3 1 4 0 DoubleCheck=74929783,75,1
74997697 0 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=74997697,75,1
75145613 0 0 3 1 4 0 DoubleCheck=75145613,75,1
75156727 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75156727,75,1
75237373 0 0 1 5 6 0 DoubleCheck=75237373,75,1
75320309 0 0 1 5 6 0 DoubleCheck=75320309,75,1
75380167 0 0 1 5 6 0 DoubleCheck=75380167,75,1
75382001 0 0 1 5 6 0 DoubleCheck=75382001,75,1
75389989 0 0 1 5 6 0 DoubleCheck=75389989,75,1
75460873 0 0 1 5 6 0 DoubleCheck=75460873,75,1
75518071 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75518071,75,1
75616043 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=75616043,75,1
75888727 0 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=75888727,75,1
75996491 0 0 3 1 4 0 DoubleCheck=75996491,75,1
76052741 0 0 2 1 3 0 DoubleCheck=76052741,75,1
76387097 0 0 3 1 4 0 DoubleCheck=76387097,75,1
77013803 5 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=77013803,75,1
77033401 10 0 0 3 1 2 DoubleCheck=77033401,75,1
77061137 1 0 2 2 4 0 DoubleCheck=77061137,75,1
77265739 3 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=77265739,75,1
77501429 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=77501429,75,1
77506309 0 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=77506309,75,1
77550541 1 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=77550541,76,1
77558903 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=77558903,75,1
77565097 0 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=77565097,75,1
77566033 3 1 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=77566033,75,1
77758111 2 0 3 1 1 3 DoubleCheck=77758111,75,1
77759441 2 0 1 2 3 0 DoubleCheck=77759441,75,1
77808007 0 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=77808007,75,1
77808649 0 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=77808649,75,1
77918993 0 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=77918993,75,1
77952019 2 0 1 2 3 0 DoubleCheck=77952019,75,1
77964631 0 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=77964631,75,1
78132979 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=78132979,75,1
78133063 2 0 1 2 3 0 DoubleCheck=78133063,75,1
78168437 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=78168437,75,1
78177709 0 0 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=78177709,75,1
78549767 0 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=78549767,75,1
79487833 3 1 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=79487833,75,1
79720241 0 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=79720241,75,1
79819147 1 0 0 2 1 1 DoubleCheck=79819147,75,1
80087519 3 0 0 2 2 0 DoubleCheck=80087519,75,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;454329]Here's a new list of strategic double checks.

[CODE]50063149 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=50063149,73,1
50116567 0 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=50116567,73,1
50207089 0 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=50207089,73,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I've taken these first three above 50M from the list. The first three (below 50M) are still available to my knowledge.

I took the first 3:

43354193
44636387
49555217