![]() |
[QUOTE=srow7;438670]@madpoo
can you check the track record of this user Alex. Thanks 36678431 LL Bad;2007-09-13;Alex;B2D9D78FCE2EE59E 36678431 LL Verified;2016-07-23;srow7;12AEFBE9B83289A5 36678431 LL Verified;2016-07-24;rudimeier;12AEFBE9B83289A5[/QUOTE] He only had 1 bad, 1 good. That was it... only ever ran 2 tests. |
[QUOTE=Mark Rose;438618]There is the triple check thread for that, at least. Also, MadPoo and AirSquirrels are triple checking every exponent that needs it. I'm not sure up to what range they've finished.[/QUOTE]
The triple-checking is going... slowly but surely I think we're making a dent. Right now I have most of the 60-70M triple-checks assigned to myself and I may finish those up in 2-3 months (probably more like 3 before the last one finishes). In the meantime I've just been picking up a few other smaller ones here and there to feed my slower machines. Once that big bunch I assigned to myself all at once (why'd I do so many at once?) finishes, I'll be able to tackle more of the smaller < 60M stuff again. There are 1890 *available* exponents that fall into that "needs triple checking" category, although that excludes anything where AirSquirrels or I have already run one check. 669 available exponents where Airsquirrels or I did a previous test (from the strategic DC stuff)... we may end up doing the triple-check of each others, but before doing that I was just waiting to see how many get auto assigned to anyone else. There are 4559 total when I include all of the already-assigned stuff as well as the work where Airsquirrels or I did a test. |
[QUOTE=Mark Rose;438982]Queued. I should have them done in three weeks or so.[/QUOTE]
Thanks a lot! Hopefully my results are the correct ones :) |
[QUOTE=rudi_m;438999]Thanks a lot! Hopefully my results are the correct ones :)[/QUOTE]
You're lucky. If I had visited an hour later I would have queued MadPoo's list instead lol |
[QUOTE=Mark Rose;439001]You're lucky. If I had visited an hour later I would have queued MadPoo's list instead lol[/QUOTE]
Now I'm feeling guilty. Let me do some triple or double checks for you! |
[QUOTE=rudi_m;439007]Now I'm feeling guilty. Let me do some triple or double checks for you![/QUOTE]
It's okay. All my machines have never turned in a bad result. I'd rather we get ahead on the strategic double checks! Take the low ones before someone else does ;) I took the triple checks because I want to make sure the five new machines they are queued on are truly reliable -- every one should match your result. |
[QUOTE=Madpoo;438985]Here's a new list... sorry, I've been busy the past couple weeks. :smile:
This is a funky list of anything with more (bad + suspect) than good and only has this one un-DC'd exponent left. In these cases, if they had a suspect result at all, whoever ran the other check had a mismatch so there's a good chance it was actually bad, so I'm basically treating those tests as bad for this run. With only 1 unchecked exponent left, there's no chance to see if they trend better/worse, so the only way to know is to check this final one.[/QUOTE] From the list, I've claimed some from the top and a few from the bottom [CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 39652001 9 10 1 3 1 3 DoubleCheck=39652001,71,1 40035407 2 2 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=40035407,72,1 40058047 15 8 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40058047,72,1 40140053 26 20 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40140053,72,1 40156199 21 17 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40156199,72,1 40340723 2 2 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=40340723,72,1 40437613 2 2 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=40437613,72,1 40580131 1 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=40580131,72,1 40606603 11 8 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40606603,72,1 40630201 38 22 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40630201,72,1 40692689 3 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40692689,72,1 40788833 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40788833,72,1 40878647 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40878647,72,1 40938013 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40938013,72,1 41228987 5 4 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41228987,72,1 41236483 6 2 1 4 1 4 DoubleCheck=41236483,72,1 75620593 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75620593,75,1 75737747 3 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=75737747,75,1 76937989 0 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=76937989,75,1[/CODE] |
[QUOTE=endless mike;439016]From the list, I've claimed some from the top and a few from the bottom
[/QUOTE] I too the all other ones below 42000000. |
I took these:
[CODE]42196171 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42196171,72,1 42227707 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42227707,72,1 [/CODE] |
[QUOTE=Madpoo;438985]Here's a new list... sorry, I've been busy the past couple weeks. :smile:[/quote]
I took: [CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 46210547 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=46210547,72,1 46507511 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=46507511,72,1 46572143 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=46572143,72,1 46668989 0 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46668989,72,1 46736993 12 12 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46736993,72,1 46870163 2 1 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=46870163,72,1 47267977 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47267977,72,1 47553799 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47553799,72,1 48736217 0 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=48736217,72,1 50306941 3 2 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=50306941,73,1[/CODE] |
I took the ones below 65000000
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.