[QUOTE=Madpoo;428742]Been a while since I've posted a new list, so here goes:
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
52534751 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=52534751,73,1
54627319 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=54627319,73,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I took these two. I'm guessing the ones above these are all taken.

Edit: BTW, I got mismatches on M50622967 and M50821703

[QUOTE=Madpoo;428742]Been a while since I've posted a new list, so here goes:
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39487807 3 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39487807,71,1

44588437 4 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44588437,72,1
44904473 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=44904473,72,1
47035511 2 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=47035511,72,1
47729323 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=47729323,72,1
47879687 2 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=47879687,72,1
48132013 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48132013,72,1
48292061 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=48292061,72,1
49463371 2 1 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=49463371,72,1
52078513 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=52078513,73,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]
Took these ten.
These two were already claimed by ANONYMOUS
[CODE]42754043 3 0 3 1 3 1 DoubleCheck=42754043,72,1
42898351 2 1 1 4 1 4 DoubleCheck=42898351,72,1[/CODE]

I got a mismatch on M52534751. Somehow, LaurV has already confirmed my residue.

[QUOTE=ET_;428085][code]
43883923 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=43883923,72,1
44588437 4 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=44588437,72,1
49463371 3 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=49463371,72,1
[/code]

mine :smile:[/QUOTE]

Mismatch on everyone :sad:

Guess I should stop double-checking with my GTX980...

[QUOTE=ET_;429193]Mismatch on everyone :sad:

Guess I should stop double-checking with my GTX980...[/QUOTE]

Mismatches are expected though... that's why these are being tested ahead of schedule.

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;429190]I got a mismatch on M52534751. Somehow, LaurV has already confirmed my residue.[/QUOTE]

Oh, I see. This is the same exponent that LaurV didn't want to submit because he had a mismatch. Once a result matching his was submitted, he submitted his own result.

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;429199]Oh, I see. This is the same exponent that LaurV didn't want to submit because he had a mismatch. Once a result matching his was submitted, he submitted his own result.[/QUOTE]

Yes, a bad habit of his. Several years ago he had some issues, mostly relating to test versions of CuLu IIRC, that caused several consecutive bad results. Since then he refuses to turn in mismatches unless he verifies them himself (still only reports it once though) or someone else does too, even though the overwhelming majority of his results since then have been consistently good.

:laurv: :smile:

[QUOTE=ET_;429193]Mismatch on everyone :sad:

Guess I should stop double-checking with my GTX980...[/QUOTE]
I have become very reluctant to trust my CUDALucas results on a GTX 580. I have some good results, but a very significant number of bad ones. I think part of my problem is successfully overriding factory OC, i.e.: keeping the core and memory clocks restrained. In any case, it hasn't really proven to be worth taking the card off of TF work, where it shines (and draws lots of power. :sad:)

Does CUDALucas have the Prime95 equivalents of round off and SUM(INPUTS) checking?

[QUOTE=ixfd64;429242]Does CUDALucas have the Prime95 equivalents of round off and SUM(INPUTS) checking?[/QUOTE]
Yes, at least to the first:[INDENT](from cudalucas.ini)
# RoundoffTest is a binary option. If set to 1, roundoff errors are checked at the
# beginning of each test.
# Default 0

RoundoffTest=1
[/INDENT]I always have had this set. I think I have seen it in action once. Still, proven bad results show up.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;428742][CODE]
55415323 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=55415323,74,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I've taken this exponent containing only the digits 1-5.