Here's a new list. Some of these are in the "churn" zone... may go fast.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
38305409 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38305409,71,1
38601403 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38601403,71,1
38941213 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38941213,71,1
39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1
39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1
39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1
40356571 8 3 6 2 6 2 DoubleCheck=40356571,72,1
40392127 8 4 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=40392127,72,1
40568431 18 5 1 4 1 4 DoubleCheck=40568431,72,1
40605407 4 0 5 1 4 2 DoubleCheck=40605407,72,1
46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1[/CODE]

Thanks!
 

A big thank you to Madpoo for triple-checking 35895053 and 36011531! I would have been surprised if the bad results were mine, but you never know. So good to not have a long wait before resolution. They were cat 3's back in August, so the triple-checks would have had to wait at least for the head of the cat 2 queue to move up to them (it's nearly there now) and it probably would have slipped past them anyway, leaving them at the back of the cat 1 queue.
:tu: :coffee:

[QUOTE=markr;427147]A big thank you to Madpoo for triple-checking 35895053 and 36011531! I would have been surprised if the bad results were mine, but you never know. So good to not have a long wait before resolution. They were cat 3's back in August, so the triple-checks would have had to wait at least for the head of the cat 2 queue to move up to them (it's nearly there now) and it probably would have slipped past them anyway, leaving them at the back of the cat 1 queue.
:tu: :coffee:[/QUOTE]

Yeah, all part of my (and AirSquirrels too) plan to slog away at some of these triple-checks that are needed.

My ultimate goal with those is to build up the knowledge of bad/good machines, but it's also kind of fun to clear those out anyway.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;427144]Here's a new list. Some of these are in the "churn" zone... may go fast.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
38305409 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38305409,71,1
38601403 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38601403,71,1
38941213 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38941213,71,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

going to take these for work over the next week or so

[QUOTE=Madpoo;427144]Here's a new list. Some of these are in the "churn" zone... may go fast.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1
39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1
39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1
40356571 8 3 6 2 6 2 DoubleCheck=40356571,72,1
40392127 8 4 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=40392127,72,1
40568431 18 5 1 4 1 4 DoubleCheck=40568431,72,1
40605407 4 0 5 1 4 2 DoubleCheck=40605407,72,1
46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Queued up the other 8 of them.

Here's another handful if anyone's interested. I'll try to just pop a few of these in here now and then.

Overall, I think we've done a really good job of getting the low hanging fruit, and we're getting down to stuff where the CPU has less than a 2;1 bad/good ratio. Still WAY higher than they should be, but just not as certain we'll mismatch on our run.

For those I'll probably start pulling out just the smallest available exponent from those systems so we can test just one more at a time and see which direction we're heading before we pull more from the same thing. I've also setup another query to narrow results down by year and month to try and spot systems that were mostly good for a year or a quarter, but had a bad month... apparently that's a thing, there are machines like that. :smile:

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39125137 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=39125137,71,1
39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1
39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1
39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1
39285991 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39285991,71,1
46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1
52276529 25 3 1 5 1 5 DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1
63462271 23 11 2 5 2 5 DoubleCheck=63462271,74,1[/CODE]

I took these:

[CODE]
39125137 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=39125137,71,1
39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1
39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1
39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1
39285991 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39285991,71,1
[/CODE]

That 52M one with 25 bad to 3 good looks very tasty....

I took these two:

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1
52276529 25 3 1 5 1 5 DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1[/CODE]

My first batch of strategic DCs in the 50M range is over.

Could I request triple-checks for 50803771, 53998279, 50967491 ?

[QUOTE=fivemack;427512]
Could I request triple-checks for 50803771, 53998279, 50967491 ?[/QUOTE]

They are running.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;427401]

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39125137 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=39125137,71,1
39239509 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39239509,71,1
39263383 13 6 3 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=39263383,71,1
39273809 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=39273809,71,1
39285991 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39285991,71,1
46550347 2 1 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46550347,72,1
52276529 25 3 1 5 1 5 DoubleCheck=52276529,73,1
63462271 23 11 2 5 2 5 DoubleCheck=63462271,74,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

This list and the one from 22 Feb seem to have a couple of duplicates.
I guess we are quad checking those.