I'll take the first one:
DoubleCheck=38904911,71,1

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;422915]I like juicy, so that one is mine. I'll prioritize it as it will almost certainly need a triple check.[/QUOTE]

As expected, [url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=38827301&full=1]M38827301[/url] needs a triple check:

DoubleCheck=38827301,71,1

It's a bit older but M57936677 needs a triple check

I know someone will want this one... just became available from an expired assignment.
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
38746907 9 0 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=38746907,71,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;423570]I know someone will want this one... just became available from an expired assignment.
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
38746907 9 0 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=38746907,71,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Mine.

[QUOTE=kladner;423413]I'll take the first one:
DoubleCheck=38904911,71,1[/QUOTE]

I took the next 3:
DoubleCheck=38931791,71,1
DoubleCheck=46140331,72,1
DoubleCheck=47908891,72,1

I also grabbed through 46733059 from post 744.

[QUOTE=frmky;423631]I took the next 3:[/QUOTE]

I took the next one after those:
DoubleCheck=50243741,73,1

M59272363 also needs a triple check

M59272363 needs a triple. should I keep posting the ones I finish that need triples or just wait for madpoo to compile his next list of them?

[QUOTE=dragonbud20;423857]M59272363 needs a triple. should I keep posting the ones I finish that need triples or just wait for madpoo to compile his next list of them?[/QUOTE]

Right now there are:
[LIST][*]1 quint check (assigned to anonymous user, no progress and is probably abandoned)[*]17 quad checks available (I've already done one test, someone else will have to do the 4th and hopefully final check)[*]22 quad checks assigned (~12 of them are ones I've run a check already)[*]4579 triple checks available (some I've done one of the checks...642 of them!!)[*]3099 triple checks assigned[/LIST]
As you can see, there are quite a lot of exponents already out there that need triple checking. One of my goals was to pick out exponents where either both machines are iffy, or where both machines have fewer bad than good, meaning the end result will bump one or the other into the bad category, potentially.

In general I'd like to think that people volunteering in here to pick up some of these strategic double checks have a mostly reliable system, so their triple checks will probably be at the lower part of the barrel in terms of priority. It's a compliment... we're trusting you all to do a great job. :smile:

If your machine is less than reliable, maybe you'd do a better job of running triple checks, thus increasing your confidence in the final result. After all, if you fail to match *two* previous results, there's a very good chance your system is bad, all other things being equal. LOL

[QUOTE=Madpoo;424131][LIST][*]17 quad checks available (I've already done one test, someone else will have to do the 4th and hopefully final check)[/LIST][/QUOTE]

Here are those available exponents needing quad checks. That smallest one just showed up today after a triple check I ran failed to match either previous run. I'm pretty sure all of these have one test by me:
[CODE]DoubleCheck=35540807,71,1
DoubleCheck=49654117,72,1
DoubleCheck=50128459,73,1
DoubleCheck=50919889,73,1
DoubleCheck=52331561,73,1
DoubleCheck=52436017,73,1
DoubleCheck=54427367,73,1
DoubleCheck=55570813,74,1
DoubleCheck=55864219,73,1
DoubleCheck=56153731,73,1
DoubleCheck=56302951,73,1
DoubleCheck=56420057,74,1
DoubleCheck=57207373,73,1
DoubleCheck=58908557,73,1
DoubleCheck=61859557,73,1
DoubleCheck=63182767,74,1
DoubleCheck=66357433,74,1[/CODE]