[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
38671361 5 2 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=38671361,71,1
38674651 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=38674651,71,1
[/CODE]

Mine

My residues for M54394937 and M54398093 matched George's (from post #577).

[QUOTE=Madpoo;420345]Here's a list... we're running out of 3:1 bad/good work, so I pulled the top 200 "worst" computers by their bad/good ratio and spit out all of the available exponents from them.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
43758677 22 11 13 3 13 3 DoubleCheck=43758677,72,1
45046607 22 11 13 3 13 3 DoubleCheck=45046607,72,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]
Mine.

Edit: The ones in between the ones I took and those that UBR47K took were grabbed by ANONYMOUS.

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;420370]Edit: The ones in between the ones I took and those that UBR47K took were grabbed by ANONYMOUS.[/QUOTE]

Bummer... I wish I had a way to "pre-reserve" these and just let someone take over the assignment so that wouldn't happen. Not really feasible to do that though. Well, I guess I'm not really sure what would happen if I created an assignment under my account, for example, and then let someone else run and check it in using that assignment ID, but their own account.

I'm pretty sure they would get the credit since at that point it doesn't really care who the assignment was generated for, it's only looking at the account used when checking in the result. The downside would be that if you looked in your account to see what assignments you had, it wouldn't show up for you.

Then the fact that I'd be posting lists on here with the full assignment ID's which opens it up to some trickster manually expiring those.

Ah well... I guess the lesson is, if you pick out some exponents, check that they're still available (like you did) and try to get those assigned to you ASAP.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;420375]Bummer... I wish I had a way to "pre-reserve" these and just let someone take over the assignment so that wouldn't happen.[/QUOTE]

I think in this case it might be that ANONYMOUS might have been working on the assignments with a prior assignment ID, noticed they got recycled, and then reclaimed them getting new assignments.

I posted that these exponents had been claimed just to help people reading this thread know that those are no longer available.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;420375]Ah well... I guess the lesson is, if you pick out some exponents, check that they're still available (like you did) and try to get those assigned to you ASAP.[/QUOTE]
Yes, that's exactly what I do.

[QUOTE=richs;420344]My DC of 36269221 didn't match. Anyone like to TC it?[/QUOTE]
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36269221&full=1"]We matched![/URL]

36297901
Verified 2007-01-16 William A. Staffen 420C5CEDEF17DB6C
Verified 2015-12-28 ktony 420C5CEDEF17DB6C

Thanks for the triple check, sdbardwick!

Rich

More 3:1 bad/good stuff
 

Here's an updated list. I recently bumped one system from 2:1 into the 3:1 category... one available exponent from it. And looks like some other juicy ones are available thanks to expired assignments.

Don't be shy about taking those larger ones either. :smile: I've been working on some from those CPUs and they're turning up bad more often than not.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
38496067 7 1 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=38496067,71,1
39104503 13 1 2 1 1 2 DoubleCheck=39104503,71,1
41508253 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=41508253,72,1
42367271 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=42367271,72,1
57766307 6 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=57766307,73,1
69009877 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=69009877,74,1
69459743 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=69459743,74,1
69503513 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=69503513,74,1
69586357 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=69586357,74,1
69603371 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=69603371,75,1
69777287 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=69777287,75,1
69794827 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69794827,74,1
69794929 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69794929,74,1
69795181 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69795181,74,1
69795347 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69795347,74,1
69795587 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69795587,74,1
69795599 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69795599,74,1
69795809 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69795809,74,1
69795937 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69795937,74,1
69795991 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69795991,74,1
69796031 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69796031,74,1
69796049 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69796049,74,1
69796213 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69796213,74,1
69796313 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69796313,74,1
69796343 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69796343,74,1
69796913 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69796913,74,1
69797243 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69797243,74,1
69797681 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69797681,74,1
69798017 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69798017,74,1
69798137 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69798137,74,1
69798173 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69798173,74,1
69798181 5 1 26 0 24 2 DoubleCheck=69798181,74,1
72096443 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=72096443,74,1
72107267 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=72107267,74,1
72162271 13 2 34 5 33 6 DoubleCheck=72162271,74,1[/CODE]

And some strategic *triple* checks... the outcome of which will help us look closely at the bad result and see if that CPU has more bad stuff.

[CODE]exponent worktodo
38447293 DoubleCheck=38447293,71,1
38475299 DoubleCheck=38475299,71,1
38746493 DoubleCheck=38746493,71,1
38795741 DoubleCheck=38795741,71,1
42364411 DoubleCheck=42364411,72,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;420626]And some strategic *triple* checks... the outcome of which will help us look closely at the bad result and see if that CPU has more bad stuff.

[CODE]exponent worktodo
38447293 DoubleCheck=38447293,71,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Mine.

EDIT: Only the first. I misread what I was getting into. Sorry.

I took these:
[CODE]DoubleCheck=41508253,72,1
DoubleCheck=42367271,72,1
DoubleCheck=57766307,73,1

DoubleCheck=38496067,71,1
DoubleCheck=38475299,71,1
DoubleCheck=38746493,71,1
DoubleCheck=38795741,71,1
DoubleCheck=42364411,72,1
[/CODE]