[QUOTE=0PolarBearsHere;418181]Can someone do a TC of 36122561 please?[/QUOTE]
Mine!

[QUOTE=Madpoo;418176]Here's a short list of exponents in the 35M range that need a triple-check to determine the winner and loser. :smile:

In each case, the 2 machines that already ran tests have more good than bad, but not so many good (over 15) that I would have "assumed" it was the right one in my analysis.

[CODE]exponent worktodo
[U][B]35552689 DoubleCheck=35552689,71,1[/B][/U]
.......[/CODE][/QUOTE]
I'll take the first in the list.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;418176]Here's a short list of exponents in the 35M range that need a triple-check to determine the winner and loser. :smile:[/QUOTE]

OK, thanks. Mine.

[QUOTE=chalsall;418195]OK, thanks. Mine.[/QUOTE]
See above. :smile:

[QUOTE=kladner;418196]See above. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Whoops... Sorry.

Although the system did assign it to me. Should I release it? It hasn't started yet.

[QUOTE=LaurV;418175]They behave the same as their counterpart from NV. Higher prices, lower clocks, more reliable memory (ECC, depends on card).
Like [URL="http://www.amd.com/Documents/FirePro_W9100_Data_Sheet.pdf"]this[/URL], or even [URL="http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/server/s9170#2"]this[/URL].[/QUOTE]

I have a couple FirePros (W9100, W8100, W7100) - All are extremely reliable vs. the identical 7950/7970 consumer cards I have.

Should we move this GPU LL reliability discussion somewhere else, out of MadPoo's hair?

Here's another batch of things needing triple checks to sort things out.

I thought you might be interested to see the raw numbers behind each exponent, but since these are exponents with *two* checks already done without a match, that means each exponent shows up twice, with the stats for each CPU showing up.

Just keep that in mind when picking work to do, that you only want to add *one* worktodo entry. :smile:

I picked these because in each case, the 2 checks were done by a system where if either of them gets one more "bad" result, it moves it into an "equal bad and good" status where it becomes a candidate for further checking... and we're guaranteed that at least one of them (maybe both?) will get one more bad result.

Once that happens we can do more checks of whichever one, but we'll get to that down the road.

Meanwhile, enjoy! I think by eyeballing the data I get to see, you'll have a good guess on some of these as to which is bad.

[CODE]worktodo exponent Bad Good Unk Solo Sus Mis
DoubleCheck=43094113,72,1 43094113 0 1 4 4 2 2
DoubleCheck=43094113,72,1 43094113 0 1 4 3 0 1

DoubleCheck=43445749,72,1 43445749 0 1 4 4 2 2
DoubleCheck=43445749,72,1 43445749 0 1 7 6 0 1

DoubleCheck=43467029,72,1 43467029 0 1 5 5 1 1
DoubleCheck=43467029,72,1 43467029 3 4 19 18 0 1

DoubleCheck=43474733,72,1 43474733 0 1 1 1 1 1
DoubleCheck=43474733,72,1 43474733 0 1 15 14 0 1

DoubleCheck=43514869,72,1 43514869 0 1 16 11 0 5
DoubleCheck=43514869,72,1 43514869 0 1 8 8 1 1

DoubleCheck=44348203,72,1 44348203 0 1 9 8 4 5
DoubleCheck=44348203,72,1 44348203 0 1 22 21 0 1

DoubleCheck=44393981,72,1 44393981 0 1 2 2 2 2
DoubleCheck=44393981,72,1 44393981 0 1 3 2 0 1

DoubleCheck=44665981,72,1 44665981 0 1 3 3 4 4
DoubleCheck=44665981,72,1 44665981 0 1 3 2 0 1

DoubleCheck=44666057,72,1 44666057 0 1 3 3 4 4
DoubleCheck=44666057,72,1 44666057 0 1 28 26 0 2

DoubleCheck=44953021,72,1 44953021 0 1 9 8 4 5
DoubleCheck=44953021,72,1 44953021 0 1 13 12 0 1

DoubleCheck=45156563,72,1 45156563 0 1 4 4 2 2
DoubleCheck=45156563,72,1 45156563 0 1 9 8 0 1

DoubleCheck=45250057,72,1 45250057 0 1 8 7 0 1
DoubleCheck=45250057,72,1 45250057 1 2 6 6 1 1

DoubleCheck=45683021,72,1 45683021 0 1 24 23 1 2
DoubleCheck=45683021,72,1 45683021 0 1 6 6 1 1

DoubleCheck=45730873,72,1 45730873 0 1 9 8 2 3
DoubleCheck=45730873,72,1 45730873 0 1 11 9 0 2

DoubleCheck=46655681,72,1 46655681 0 1 2 1 1 2
DoubleCheck=46655681,72,1 46655681 0 1 7 6 0 1

DoubleCheck=46663807,72,1 46663807 0 1 2 2 2 2
DoubleCheck=46663807,72,1 46663807 0 1 19 17 0 2

DoubleCheck=46663811,72,1 46663811 0 1 2 2 2 2
DoubleCheck=46663811,72,1 46663811 0 1 19 17 0 2

DoubleCheck=46664257,72,1 46664257 0 1 5 4 1 2
DoubleCheck=46664257,72,1 46664257 0 1 3 2 0 1

DoubleCheck=46793191,72,1 46793191 0 1 4 4 1 1
DoubleCheck=46793191,72,1 46793191 0 1 9 8 0 1

DoubleCheck=46976819,72,1 46976819 0 1 5 5 1 1
DoubleCheck=46976819,72,1 46976819 0 1 8 7 0 1

DoubleCheck=47535937,72,1 47535937 0 1 13 13 2 2
DoubleCheck=47535937,72,1 47535937 0 1 16 15 0 1

DoubleCheck=47929573,72,1 47929573 0 1 25 22 0 3
DoubleCheck=47929573,72,1 47929573 1 2 8 8 1 1

DoubleCheck=48063263,72,1 48063263 0 1 10 9 0 1
DoubleCheck=48063263,72,1 48063263 5 6 4 4 10 10

DoubleCheck=48154063,72,1 48154063 0 1 4 4 7 7
DoubleCheck=48154063,72,1 48154063 0 1 4 3 0 1

DoubleCheck=48225179,72,1 48225179 0 1 4 4 7 7
DoubleCheck=48225179,72,1 48225179 0 1 9 8 0 1

DoubleCheck=48229303,72,1 48229303 0 1 4 4 7 7
DoubleCheck=48229303,72,1 48229303 0 1 26 25 0 1

DoubleCheck=48411821,72,1 48411821 0 1 1 1 4 4
DoubleCheck=48411821,72,1 48411821 0 1 23 22 0 1

DoubleCheck=48469711,72,1 48469711 0 1 3 3 2 2
DoubleCheck=48469711,72,1 48469711 0 1 3 2 0 1

DoubleCheck=49266103,72,1 49266103 0 1 2 2 1 1
DoubleCheck=49266103,72,1 49266103 0 1 7 6 0 1

DoubleCheck=49451041,72,1 49451041 0 1 32 31 0 1
DoubleCheck=49451041,72,1 49451041 2 3 9 9 1 1

DoubleCheck=49652893,72,1 49652893 0 1 3 3 1 1
DoubleCheck=49652893,72,1 49652893 0 1 30 29 0 1

DoubleCheck=49830139,72,1 49830139 0 1 31 30 0 1
DoubleCheck=49830139,72,1 49830139 2 3 9 9 2 2

DoubleCheck=49915211,72,1 49915211 0 1 3 3 1 1
DoubleCheck=49915211,72,1 49915211 0 1 9 8 0 1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=chalsall;418200]Whoops... Sorry.

Although the system did assign it to me. Should I release it? It hasn't started yet.[/QUOTE]

I am about half-way through it on a GTX 580. Sorry, I did not run it through P95 to get it registered. I will do that now to avoid further problems.

EDIT: Oops. Yes, please release it. :davieddy:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;418165]EDIT: It's actually at 6 bad, 10 good right now. Some other tests came in that changed it. Well, with 56 more solo checks to work with, I'm sure more of them will wind up on the naughty list. :smile:[/QUOTE]
Add two more to the good column. :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;418250]Here's another batch of things needing triple checks to sort things out.[/QUOTE]
I grabbed the first 8 of these.

And here's a smidge more that just became available, including some juicy prospects:
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
38311631 8 2 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=38311631,71,1
40423301 3 0 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=40423301,72,1
40606571 12 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40606571,72,1
47224921 6 1 5 3 5 3 DoubleCheck=47224921,72,1[/CODE]