[QUOTE]Originally Posted by [B]kladner[/B] [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=416475#post416475"][IMG]http://www.mersenneforum.org/images/buttons/viewpost.gif[/IMG][/URL]
[I][U][B]I would like to throw these two back in the pool:
[/B][/U]
[COLOR=Red]DoubleCheck=57936677,73,1
DoubleCheck=59272363,73,1
[/COLOR]
[U][B]I am running 57798707.

[/B][/U]Thanks,
Kieren[/I]
[/QUOTE]

I am trying to complete the last-mentioned assignment, but I am getting pessimistic about reliability with the current crop of resets, which put the VRAM on the MSI 580, running CuLu, back at the BIOS setting of 2100 MHz, I am pessimistic about reliability. I did stop, and run -r 1 and a fairly long memtest with the RAM set to 2100 (DDR), both of which passed. If I were really concerned, I might take CuLu off the looping batch file, and only restart it manually with everything reset to 'safe' frequencies. Voltage does not get reset, at least, but the memory clock is worrisome. I have gotten a match or two from this card, but I get a lot more payback with it overclocked, doing LLTF.

In any case, I can't take on the ones in red, above. They are from one of Aaron's lists of questionable machines.

Thanks,
Kieren

[QUOTE=kladner;416475]Please allow me to back off from some of this. I am much more involved with TF work, so I was thinking backwards about the workload of higher exponents in LL.

[U][B]I would like to throw these two back in the pool:
[/B][/U]
[COLOR=Red]DoubleCheck=57936677,73,1
DoubleCheck=59272363,73,1[/COLOR]

[U][B]I am running 57798707.

[/B][/U]Thanks,
Kieren[/QUOTE][QUOTE=kladner;417196]

In any case, I can't take on the ones in red, above. They are from one of Aaron's lists of questionable machines.

Thanks,
Kieren[/QUOTE]
I'll take care of theses two for you. ETA: both will be done by the 2nd of December.

[QUOTE=dragonbud20;417218]I'll take care of theses two for you. ETA: both will be done by the 2nd of December.[/QUOTE]

Many thanks! :smile:

[QUOTE=kladner;417196]I am trying to complete the last-mentioned assignment...[/QUOTE]

If M57798707 that you're testing ends up with a mismatch, let us know and myself or someone else can do the triple-check, just in case.

Normally I'd trust everyone here to have a solid result with their test, but if in doubt, we can do the triple-check ahead of schedule like some of you have asked in the past.

I have just seen that [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=59662607&full=1"]59662607[/URL] got TC-ed and matched mine. Good job Mike.
The other ([URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=59273327&full=1"]59273327[/URL]) is still unassigned. Keeping my eyes on it.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;417295]If M57798707 that you're testing ends up with a mismatch, let us know and myself or someone else can do the triple-check, just in case.

Normally I'd trust everyone here to have a solid result with their test, but if in doubt, we can do the triple-check ahead of schedule like some of you have asked in the past.[/QUOTE]
Will do.

EDIT:
About 8 hours to go, running now. I do want to be around when it finishes, so I can reconfigure, and put the card back to LLTF work. I hate to have it sit there just looping the batch file, with no work to do.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;415770]
Here's a new list of 3:1 bad/good, including a few with even higher bad/good ratios. There are some larger exponents in the list if anyone feels like tackling the big boys (over 60M):
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
60039731 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=60039731,73,1
60039827 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=60039827,73,1
60439991 3 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=60439991,73,1
60453149 3 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=60453149,73,1
61485799 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=61485799,74,1
61552459 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=61552459,74,1
62302013 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62302013,74,1
62494429 3 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62494429,74,1
64957247 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=64957247,74,1
65438599 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=65438599,74,1
65862781 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=65862781,74,1
67457263 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=67457263,74,1
67457279 3 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=67457279,74,1
67983401 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=67983401,74,1
67983437 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=67983437,74,1
68099827 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=68099827,74,1
69454223 3 0 2 2 2 2 DoubleCheck=69454223,74,1
69643967 3 0 7 0 6 1 DoubleCheck=69643967,74,1
69675233 3 0 2 2 2 2 DoubleCheck=69675233,74,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Looks like no one has claimed any of the greater over 60M, so I added them to my machines to run.

[QUOTE=LaurV;417310]I have just seen that [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=59662607&full=1"]59662607[/URL] got TC-ed and matched mine. Good job Mike.
The other ([URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=59273327&full=1"]59273327[/URL]) is still unassigned. Keeping my eyes on it.[/QUOTE]

Just doing some random triple checks on stuff people mentioned not getting a match of in this thread:smile:. I added the other one to my worktodo just now to balance out the 19 that I claimed above.

All should be complete before the end of December.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;415360]In case anyone wants more of these fun assignments...

[CODE]exponent Ratio Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
exponent Ratio Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
38130749 4.00 4 1 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=38130749,71,1
43919461 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=43919461,72,1
43919527 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=43919527,72,1
43919671 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=43919671,72,1
44771917 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=44771917,72,1
44946037 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=44946037,72,1
45535901 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=45535901,72,1
46300987 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=46300987,72,1
47425219 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=47425219,72,1
47568511 4.00 4 0 12 1 11 2 DoubleCheck=47568511,72,1
37595837 3.00 6 2 3 2 2 3 DoubleCheck=37595837,71,1
42407327 3.00 3 0 6 4 6 4 DoubleCheck=42407327,72,1
42719503 3.00 3 0 6 4 6 4 DoubleCheck=42719503,72,1
43389751 3.00 3 0 3 1 3 1 DoubleCheck=43389751,72,1
43612379 3.00 3 0 6 4 6 4 DoubleCheck=43612379,72,1
43927669 3.00 3 0 6 4 6 4 DoubleCheck=43927669,72,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=endless mike;415449]Taking these 16[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=endless mike;417062]Twelve of them have completed, all twelve will need a triple check.[/QUOTE]

The last four completed, two matched, two didn't.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;417075]Oh wow, good job! That's quite the string of mismatches. On a good day I've probably seen 75% of my tests mismatch the first run...I don't think I've had a run of 12. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I was quite impressed with the run of luck there:cool:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;417295]If M57798707 that you're testing ends up with a mismatch, let us know and myself or someone else can do the triple-check, just in case.

Normally I'd trust everyone here to have a solid result with their test, but if in doubt, we can do the triple-check ahead of schedule like some of you have asked in the past.[/QUOTE]

I mismatched, but as I said, I am a bit leery of my own results. Under the circumstances, I'd be very pleasantly surprised if someone else happened to match mine.

Wow!
I mean WOW!
14 of 16 mismatched ?

@kladner:
You should not be worried.
I think more like Chris said: Madpoo is really into something here! Those initial tests [U]were bad![/U]
I had DC/TC mismatches too, and they all checked mine by third parties TC/QC respectively, except one which is on the way to TC.
I would bet that your result is ok (and endless mike's too).

[QUOTE=kladner;417440]I mismatched, but as I said, I am a bit leery of my own results. Under the circumstances, I'd be very pleasantly surprised if someone else happened to match mine.[/QUOTE]

We'll know in another 17 hours when my triple-check of that # finishes.