I was also amused

[QUOTE=Madpoo;415770]

Here's a new list of 3:1 bad/good, including a few with even higher bad/good ratios.
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
37062733 5 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=37062733,71,1
37063181 5 0 3 2 3 2 DoubleCheck=37063181,71,1
37179887 3 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=37179887,71,1
37433257 4 1 8 2 5 5 DoubleCheck=37433257,71,1
37436131 7 1 11 4 10 5 DoubleCheck=37436131,71,1
37465249 4 1 8 2 5 5 DoubleCheck=37465249,71,1
37674107 3 1 4 0 3 1 DoubleCheck=37674107,71,1
37812119 5 0 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=37812119,71,1
37933913 7 1 11 4 10 5 DoubleCheck=37933913,71,1
37934947 3 0 4 1 4 1 DoubleCheck=37934947,71,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Taking the 37M ones.

Heads up (2)
 

In the meanwhile, I've completed another set ([URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=412073&postcount=368"]#368[/URL]): 6 candidates, 4 matching, 2 requiring TC (41M8 and 41M9).

Oh, and by the way, is there any summary for the overall work stream? Thinking about a very basic one (# of selected cands, completed, matching, requiring TC)...

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;415789]I was also amused[/QUOTE]
one short step to 'strategic double clits'...

[QUOTE=frmky;415787]Disagreed! I am amused.[/QUOTE]

I guess I missed it... I see what it is now "Bulemic Double Clicks"... was it something else?

Yeah, I'm not a big fan of the thread topics being changed... guess I'm an old fuddy duddy. And while I'm at it, you kids stay off my lawn! :smile:

[QUOTE=ric;415795]Oh, and by the way, is there any summary for the overall work stream? Thinking about a very basic one (# of selected cands, completed, matching, requiring TC)...[/QUOTE]

That probably would have been a good idea, but unfortunately I wasn't keeping track of the exponents listed here. I guess I could go back through and look them all up, see if they matched on the 2nd try or not. Might be a fun project for a rainy day.

Anecdotally I've been doing maybe 50/50 on which ones match or not, but I've been taking a mix of "speculative" stuff as well as a few "sure things". George has reported about the same.

[QUOTE=frmky;415787]Disagreed! I am amused.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;415789]I was also amused[/QUOTE]

I am sometimes amused, on threads where the posts have diverged a bit from the topic, and not some (relatively) serious ongoing discussion actually relating to GIMPS/other MF projects which might be looking to acquire new people. So this thread, the mfaktc/mfakto/CUDALucas/Prime95 threads, etc should all be off-limits IMO. Something like the factors found thread is somewhat more appropriate.

Thanks for renaming it back. There was "agreed" that only topics in the lounge/fun/soapbox be exposed to title morphing, but some mods can't follow their own rules... :smile:

My thanks for the original title's return. :smile:

Nevermind, it is already assigned.

[QUOTE=Dubslow;415820]I am sometimes amused, on threads where the posts have diverged a bit from the topic, and not some (relatively) serious ongoing discussion actually relating to GIMPS/other MF projects which might be looking to acquire new people. So this thread, the mfaktc/mfakto/CUDALucas/Prime95 threads, etc should all be off-limits IMO. Something like the factors found thread is somewhat more appropriate.[/QUOTE]

Yes, I agree with you there, especially with the four you mentioned.