[QUOTE=Mark Rose;413503]Because the same GPU ought to be able to LL it faster than doing the higher levels of TF...[/QUOTE]
Nope, the same GPU needs to do one LL test in couple of months, may be 1.

[QUOTE]estimate how long it would take to factor 75 numbers from 75 bits to 76 bits to expect to find one factor.[/QUOTE]
I know that it is impossible to factor all for any practical time. However, I am advocating at least couple of levels in situations where you have mismatching residues or any other problematic LL test (remembering examples of 10 LL tests done, but some mismatched...). In some cases there will be a factor and the case is closed.

[QUOTE=bloodIce;413573]I know that it is impossible to factor all for any practical time. However, I am advocating at least couple of levels in situations where you have mismatching residues or any other problematic LL test (remembering examples of 10 LL tests done, but some mismatched...). In some cases there will be a factor and the case is closed.[/QUOTE]

I suppose what I should do is look again at whether any of these strategic double-check candidates have less than the GPU72 factor level. Then, at the very least, we can get those up to those levels ahead of time since we're usually doing double-checks far ahead of when it would be done normally.

I'll check again and see where we're at with those, and also with any new ones that need triple checking.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;413639]I suppose what I should do is look again at whether any of these strategic double-check candidates have less than the GPU72 factor level.[/QUOTE]

Yes. Where GPU72 nominally takes the TF'ing level to for DC'ing is optimal. Going farther doesn't make sense from a cost / benefit perspective.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;413639]I'll check again and see where we're at with those, and also with any new ones that need triple checking.[/QUOTE]

Just generate a list like before, and I'll add them to the "hopper" for prioritization.

And, this actually brings up something... If you include any that the "GPU Factoring" account holds as well (rather than limiting the list to those candidates not currently "owned" by anyone), I can set the "Priority" flag for those as well.

[QUOTE=chalsall;413643]Just generate a list like before, and I'll add them to the "hopper" for prioritization.

And, this actually brings up something... If you include any that the "GPU Factoring" account holds as well (rather than limiting the list to those candidates not currently "owned" by anyone), I can set the "Priority" flag for those as well.[/QUOTE]

Okay, here's a list of exponents where the system had more bad than good but need add'l TF work to get up to GPU72 goals.

54 of the 209 are already checked out to GPU72's account.
[CODE]exponent TF WorkToDo
42381011 71 Factor=42381011,71,72
42381881 71 Factor=42381881,71,72
42392789 71 Factor=42392789,71,72
42394721 71 Factor=42394721,71,72
43144741 71 Factor=43144741,71,72
43689301 71 Factor=43689301,71,72
44906783 70 Factor=44906783,70,72
44913173 70 Factor=44913173,70,72
44946037 70 Factor=44946037,70,72
44971193 70 Factor=44971193,70,72
45046607 70 Factor=45046607,70,72
45095273 70 Factor=45095273,70,72
45135451 70 Factor=45135451,70,72
45172189 71 Factor=45172189,71,72
45253927 71 Factor=45253927,71,72
45333721 70 Factor=45333721,70,72
45381379 70 Factor=45381379,70,72
45521537 70 Factor=45521537,70,72
45790939 70 Factor=45790939,70,72
45819593 70 Factor=45819593,70,72
46018891 70 Factor=46018891,70,72
46047383 71 Factor=46047383,71,72
46048973 70 Factor=46048973,70,72
46134581 70 Factor=46134581,70,72
46140331 70 Factor=46140331,70,72
46233977 70 Factor=46233977,70,72
46289773 70 Factor=46289773,70,72
46296641 70 Factor=46296641,70,72
46300987 70 Factor=46300987,70,72
46514591 70 Factor=46514591,70,72
46564261 70 Factor=46564261,70,72
46582073 71 Factor=46582073,71,72
46727689 70 Factor=46727689,70,72
46849357 70 Factor=46849357,70,72
46976291 71 Factor=46976291,71,72
47002633 70 Factor=47002633,70,72
47029163 71 Factor=47029163,71,72
47092189 71 Factor=47092189,71,72
47124751 71 Factor=47124751,71,72
47127167 71 Factor=47127167,71,72
47139277 70 Factor=47139277,70,72
47164339 71 Factor=47164339,71,72
47207833 70 Factor=47207833,70,72
47224109 71 Factor=47224109,71,72
47283289 70 Factor=47283289,70,72
47374501 71 Factor=47374501,71,72
47425219 71 Factor=47425219,71,72
47454943 70 Factor=47454943,70,72
47473697 70 Factor=47473697,70,72
47523409 70 Factor=47523409,70,72
47550073 71 Factor=47550073,71,72
47556083 71 Factor=47556083,71,72
47561929 70 Factor=47561929,70,72
47568511 70 Factor=47568511,70,72
47601637 70 Factor=47601637,70,72
47611999 70 Factor=47611999,70,72
47615479 70 Factor=47615479,70,72
47617711 70 Factor=47617711,70,72
47645839 70 Factor=47645839,70,72
47665771 70 Factor=47665771,70,72
47679571 70 Factor=47679571,70,72
47771783 70 Factor=47771783,70,72
47784553 71 Factor=47784553,71,72
47811013 71 Factor=47811013,71,72
47908891 70 Factor=47908891,70,72
48093373 70 Factor=48093373,70,72
48124261 70 Factor=48124261,70,72
48614947 71 Factor=48614947,71,72
48762059 71 Factor=48762059,71,72
48796651 70 Factor=48796651,70,72
48959681 70 Factor=48959681,70,72
48961069 71 Factor=48961069,71,72
48962813 70 Factor=48962813,70,72
48973627 71 Factor=48973627,71,72
48985051 71 Factor=48985051,71,72
49011299 70 Factor=49011299,70,72
49432261 70 Factor=49432261,70,72
49482271 71 Factor=49482271,71,72
49653937 70 Factor=49653937,70,72
49798871 70 Factor=49798871,70,72
49972387 71 Factor=49972387,71,72
50010461 71 Factor=50010461,71,73
50015437 71 Factor=50015437,71,73
50071361 72 Factor=50071361,72,73
50134391 71 Factor=50134391,71,73
50183843 70 Factor=50183843,70,73
50231387 72 Factor=50231387,72,73
50251009 71 Factor=50251009,71,73
50440301 71 Factor=50440301,71,73
50454631 70 Factor=50454631,70,73
50478761 70 Factor=50478761,70,73
50485727 72 Factor=50485727,72,73
50495573 72 Factor=50495573,72,73
50501257 72 Factor=50501257,72,73
50629741 72 Factor=50629741,72,73
50630971 72 Factor=50630971,72,73
50644907 72 Factor=50644907,72,73
50673587 72 Factor=50673587,72,73
50681039 72 Factor=50681039,72,73
50736013 71 Factor=50736013,71,73
50736601 71 Factor=50736601,71,73
50794489 71 Factor=50794489,71,73
50803771 71 Factor=50803771,71,73
50815243 71 Factor=50815243,71,73
50836231 71 Factor=50836231,71,73
50856193 72 Factor=50856193,72,73
50980277 71 Factor=50980277,71,73
51070039 72 Factor=51070039,72,73
51082337 71 Factor=51082337,71,73
51113597 72 Factor=51113597,72,73
51157151 71 Factor=51157151,71,73
51221507 72 Factor=51221507,72,73
51262039 71 Factor=51262039,71,73
51279307 71 Factor=51279307,71,73
51310661 70 Factor=51310661,70,73
51350627 70 Factor=51350627,70,73
51398227 71 Factor=51398227,71,73
51608143 71 Factor=51608143,71,73
51728381 71 Factor=51728381,71,73
51734329 71 Factor=51734329,71,73
51767627 71 Factor=51767627,71,73
51971957 71 Factor=51971957,71,73
52036157 71 Factor=52036157,71,73
52040693 71 Factor=52040693,71,73
52046131 72 Factor=52046131,72,73
52208287 72 Factor=52208287,72,73
52271633 70 Factor=52271633,70,73
52432669 70 Factor=52432669,70,73
52451699 70 Factor=52451699,70,73
52502101 72 Factor=52502101,72,73
52573063 71 Factor=52573063,71,73
52578707 70 Factor=52578707,70,73
52706201 71 Factor=52706201,71,73
52708763 72 Factor=52708763,72,73
52765847 71 Factor=52765847,71,73
52795207 72 Factor=52795207,72,73
52840859 71 Factor=52840859,71,73
52842527 72 Factor=52842527,72,73
52941061 71 Factor=52941061,71,73
52946071 71 Factor=52946071,71,73
53024641 71 Factor=53024641,71,73
53080561 71 Factor=53080561,71,73
53229229 71 Factor=53229229,71,73
53246203 71 Factor=53246203,71,73
53251339 72 Factor=53251339,72,73
53280347 71 Factor=53280347,71,73
53311441 71 Factor=53311441,71,73
53326681 71 Factor=53326681,71,73
53487659 71 Factor=53487659,71,73
53584603 71 Factor=53584603,71,73
53614793 71 Factor=53614793,71,73
53702083 72 Factor=53702083,72,73
53731529 72 Factor=53731529,72,73
53792723 72 Factor=53792723,72,73
54025357 71 Factor=54025357,71,73
54025849 71 Factor=54025849,71,73
54033829 71 Factor=54033829,71,73
54110261 72 Factor=54110261,72,73
54181007 72 Factor=54181007,72,73
54182419 72 Factor=54182419,72,73
54190127 72 Factor=54190127,72,73
54264709 71 Factor=54264709,71,73
54296309 72 Factor=54296309,72,73
54316393 72 Factor=54316393,72,73
54363629 71 Factor=54363629,71,73
54371573 72 Factor=54371573,72,73
54375719 72 Factor=54375719,72,73
54379657 72 Factor=54379657,72,73
54387589 72 Factor=54387589,72,73
54395981 72 Factor=54395981,72,73
54399437 72 Factor=54399437,72,73
54412313 72 Factor=54412313,72,73
54412541 72 Factor=54412541,72,73
54447823 72 Factor=54447823,72,73
54468251 72 Factor=54468251,72,73
54474733 71 Factor=54474733,71,73
54485917 71 Factor=54485917,71,73
54590273 72 Factor=54590273,72,73
54669541 71 Factor=54669541,71,73
54920227 72 Factor=54920227,72,73
54930289 72 Factor=54930289,72,73
54954721 71 Factor=54954721,71,73
55079753 71 Factor=55079753,71,73
55135919 71 Factor=55135919,71,73
55254491 71 Factor=55254491,71,73
55280521 71 Factor=55280521,71,73
55347857 72 Factor=55347857,72,73
55421701 72 Factor=55421701,72,73
55675793 72 Factor=55675793,72,73
55696219 72 Factor=55696219,72,73
55932521 72 Factor=55932521,72,73
56061541 72 Factor=56061541,72,73
56127031 71 Factor=56127031,71,73
56153387 71 Factor=56153387,71,73
56343121 72 Factor=56343121,72,73
56382929 71 Factor=56382929,71,73
56437903 72 Factor=56437903,72,73
56510917 71 Factor=56510917,71,73
56525813 72 Factor=56525813,72,73
56537249 72 Factor=56537249,72,73
56540269 72 Factor=56540269,72,73
56608621 72 Factor=56608621,72,73
56676901 71 Factor=56676901,71,73
56680709 71 Factor=56680709,71,73
56680747 71 Factor=56680747,71,73
56707517 72 Factor=56707517,72,73
56874541 71 Factor=56874541,71,73
57857561 72 Factor=57857561,72,73
57936677 72 Factor=57936677,72,73[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;413651]Okay, here's a list of exponents where the system had more bad than good but need add'l TF work to get up to GPU72 goals.[/QUOTE]

Followed by 14 exponents that need a triple check but could use extra TF work as well. Half of them are already assigned to GPU72.
[CODE]exponent TF WorkToDo
43253059 71 Factor=43253059,71,72
43254349 71 Factor=43254349,71,72
45608513 70 Factor=45608513,70,72
46513769 70 Factor=46513769,70,72
46856921 70 Factor=46856921,70,72
47523583 70 Factor=47523583,70,72
47584919 70 Factor=47584919,70,72
47643977 70 Factor=47643977,70,72
47717653 70 Factor=47717653,70,72
48760711 70 Factor=48760711,70,72
49632463 70 Factor=49632463,70,72
49789249 71 Factor=49789249,71,72
49899973 71 Factor=49899973,71,72
51513167 71 Factor=51513167,71,73[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;413651]Okay, here's a list of exponents where the system had more bad than good but need add'l TF work to get up to GPU72 goals.[/QUOTE]

OK, thanks. These are now all in the hopper and prioritized; 28 of those already assigned to GPU72 were already assigned for TF'ing (but not all 28 to the end goal).

Please feel free to bring forward such lists for additional priority TF'ing at any time, as your algorithms reveal additional suspect machines / candidates.

BTW, my machines have finished all of its SDC work (except for one, a high candidate on a slow machine). Please sir, may I have some more? :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412980]52 of these below 38M. End result will be that, whatever the outcome, at least one of these previously "spotless" CPU's will have a bad result added to their account, which will hopefully feed into our strategic double checking:
[/QUOTE]
I just reserved the last of this TC list.

Happy to report that
UID: firejuggler, M36417593 is not prime. Res64: 104739A81360C4__. We4: 968974F8,20897412,00000000, XXXXXXXXXX

and it doublecheck!

[QUOTE=chalsall;413655]OK, thanks. These are now all in the hopper and prioritized; 28 of those already assigned to GPU72 were already assigned for TF'ing (but not all 28 to the end goal).[/QUOTE]

A handful of those are currently assigned to me. I've prioritized them and they should be done in an hour or so.

Heads up
 

A brief heads-up, after the second batch of "anemic" <g> candidates:[LIST][*][URL="http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=20372&page=22"]#236 & #237[/URL] 6 candidates: 2 matching, 4 mismatches (of which 1 subsequently TC'd w/success);[*][URL="http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=411892&postcount=357"]#357[/URL] 8 candidates: 2 matching (had to be, they were both from [STRIKE]Chuck Norris[/STRIKE] ahem... ), 6 mismatches.[/LIST]Next round of other 6 cands to be started in a few days, ETC around Nov 10th. Will update as they complete.

[QUOTE=chalsall;413090]I had asked before, and I'll now ask again: Are any of the machines which are less than perfect still being assigned LL candidates? If so, might they be assigned DC Cat 2 for a while?

Separately, as a policy, should perhaps all machines requesting LL work be assigned a small percentage of DC Cat 1 work, just in order to ensure their ongoing sanity?[/QUOTE]

:hello: