[QUOTE=dragonbud20;412833]M47921893 needs a triple check[/QUOTE]

We matched.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;413034]I can't say they'll all be like this, but it does give me a fun new way of picking out work that was probably done wrong the first time. I'll try and work up some new lists of exponents to do.[/QUOTE]

In fact, here's some now. That system with the 8 bad, zero good... it was a bad year (2010) for it. The next year (2011) it did slightly better with 5 bad, 8 good. In total that machine did have more bad than good, but it wasn't quite bad enough that I was looking at it yet (13 bad, 8 good).

Similar story with that system with 15 bad and 2 good. That was 2013. Every other year seemed better.

Anyway, have at 'em:
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
46251281 4 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46251281,72,1
48137273 5 1 6 1 6 1 DoubleCheck=48137273,71,1
48222241 8 0 4 3 4 3 DoubleCheck=48222241,72,1
48223573 8 0 4 3 4 3 DoubleCheck=48223573,72,1
48533047 5 1 6 1 6 1 DoubleCheck=48533047,71,1
49578379 4 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=49578379,71,1
49585297 8 0 4 3 4 3 DoubleCheck=49585297,72,1
49773601 5 1 6 1 6 1 DoubleCheck=49773601,70,1
52219579 15 2 1 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=52219579,73,1
54083921 5 0 1 3 1 3 DoubleCheck=54083921,73,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;413036]Anyway, have at 'em:[/QUOTE]

I took them. I'll also TF them "appropriately" in parallel, as needed.

Requesting a triple check to a exponent done by a new machine.
[code]Doublecheck=41516807,72,1[/code]

[QUOTE=UBR47K;413081]Requesting a triple check to a exponent done by a new machine.[/QUOTE]

I've put it on one of my highly reliable machines. ~48 hours.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412980]
[CODE]exponent worktodo
36524963 DoubleCheck=36524963,71,1
36681691 DoubleCheck=36681691,71,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Grabbed these two

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412980]
[CODE]exponent worktodo
36685543 DoubleCheck=36685543,71,1
36777289 DoubleCheck=36777289,71,1
36849583 DoubleCheck=36849583,71,1
36863647 DoubleCheck=36863647,71,1
36868357 DoubleCheck=36868357,71,1
36880643 DoubleCheck=36880643,71,1
36899831 DoubleCheck=36899831,71,1
36950449 DoubleCheck=36950449,71,1
36996521 DoubleCheck=36996521,71,1
37055581 DoubleCheck=37055581,71,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]
And these also. Just adding to multiple machines worktodo files

And these also. Just adding to multiple machines worktodo files

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412980]
[CODE]exponent worktodo
37069369 DoubleCheck=37069369,71,1
37096859 DoubleCheck=37096859,71,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I think I have enough for now

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412911]If anyone else is interested in trying out a couple smaller ones using this approach, here's a few:[/QUOTE]

OK, the part of this batch (the last three) that I took are now complete.

42846421 matched, 43100209 and 43268627 didn't.

If I may "blow some sunshine" your way, thanks for doing this Aaron. A very creative and thoughtful idea, and tangibly beneficial to GIMPS, and for those who use Prime95/mprime for stress testing.

I had asked before, and I'll now ask again: Are any of the machines which are less than perfect still being assigned LL candidates? If so, might they be assigned DC Cat 2 for a while?

Separately, as a policy, should perhaps all machines requesting LL work be assigned a small percentage of DC Cat 1 work, just in order to ensure their ongoing sanity?

[QUOTE=chalsall;413090]42846421 matched, 43100209 and 43268627 didn't.[/QUOTE]
And my check of 42676009 just finished with a mismatch.

[QUOTE=chalsall;413090]Separately, as a policy, should perhaps all machines requesting LL work be assigned a small percentage of DC Cat 1 work, just in order to ensure their ongoing sanity?[/QUOTE]

Whoops... Perhaps I pushed the envelope too far in another thread here.

Sorry about that. It's just my training (and my nature)....

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412980]52 of these below 38M. [/QUOTE]
I reserved those available up to and including 37452281.