[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;412057]Needs a triple check.[/QUOTE]

Your machine has a 7 good/zero bad track record, compared to the 1 good/2 bad for that other system. I'd guess yours is correct. :smile: If someone wanted to triple-check it now that's cool but I'm satisfied we weeded out that bad result. :)

Now, down the road if we find out your computer started getting bad results, we'll revisit it. LOL

More exponents for DC'ing
 

Here's an updated list for anyone interested.

By the way, I've been focusing on the exponents below 58M, but there are some above 58M if anyone was interested. For those I can limit it to just the likeliest to be wrong, but let me know. For the most part though I was interested in the <58M since my theory is that we missed one somewhere. :smile:

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
37557493 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=37557493,71,1
37782319 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=37782319,71,1
38043409 9 3 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=38043409,71,1
41537413 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41537413,72,1
41894551 2 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=41894551,72,1
41907773 2 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=41907773,72,1
42003697 5 2 4 1 2 3 DoubleCheck=42003697,72,1
42033437 3 0 4 2 4 2 DoubleCheck=42033437,72,1
42069659 15 5 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=42069659,72,1
42281123 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=42281123,72,1
42351877 4 0 10 2 6 6 DoubleCheck=42351877,72,1
42467171 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=42467171,72,1
42736193 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=42736193,72,1
42797191 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=42797191,72,1
43218361 14 5 12 0 6 6 DoubleCheck=43218361,72,1
47446793 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=47446793,72,1
47446873 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=47446873,72,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412063]By the way, I've been focusing on the exponents below 58M, but there are some above 58M if anyone was interested. For those I can limit it to just the likeliest to be wrong, but let me know.[/QUOTE]

For instance... here's one system in particular. I found one or two and then tested a couple more only to find that, pretty reliably, all of the ones I checked from this computer were winding up (probably) bad:
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
59273327 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=59273327,73,1
59662607 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=59662607,73,1
60094681 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=60094681,73,1
60174619 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=60174619,74,1
60475853 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=60475853,75,1
60524137 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=60524137,73,1
60542849 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=60542849,73,1
60750457 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=60750457,73,1
63161729 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=63161729,74,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412065]
59273327 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=59273327,73,1
59662607 6 1 9 4 9 4 DoubleCheck=59662607,73,1
[/QUOTE]
say I take these

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412063]Here's an updated list for anyone interested.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
37557493 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=37557493,71,1
37782319 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=37782319,71,1
38043409 9 3 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=38043409,71,1
41537413 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41537413,72,1
41894551 2 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=41894551,72,1
41907773 2 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=41907773,72,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Reserving the ones below 42M.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412063]Here's an updated list for anyone interested.

By the way, I've been focusing on the exponents below 58M, but there are some above 58M if anyone was interested. For those I can limit it to just the likeliest to be wrong, but let me know. For the most part though I was interested in the <58M since my theory is that we missed one somewhere. :smile:

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
37557493 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=37557493,71,1
37782319 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=37782319,71,1
38043409 9 3 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=38043409,71,1
41537413 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41537413,72,1
41894551 2 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=41894551,72,1
41907773 2 0 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=41907773,72,1
[B]42003697 5 2 4 1 2 3 DoubleCheck=42003697,72,1[/B]
42033437 3 0 4 2 4 2 DoubleCheck=42033437,72,1
42069659 15 5 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=42069659,72,1
42281123 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=42281123,72,1
42351877 4 0 10 2 6 6 DoubleCheck=42351877,72,1
42467171 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=42467171,72,1
42736193 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=42736193,72,1
42797191 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=42797191,72,1
43218361 14 5 12 0 6 6 DoubleCheck=43218361,72,1
47446793 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=47446793,72,1
47446873 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=47446873,72,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I took the first one over 42 million, in bold above

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412063]Here's an updated list for anyone interested.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
42033437 3 0 4 2 4 2 DoubleCheck=42033437,72,1
42069659 15 5 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=42069659,72,1
42281123 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=42281123,72,1
42351877 4 0 10 2 6 6 DoubleCheck=42351877,72,1
42467171 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=42467171,72,1
42736193 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=42736193,72,1
42797191 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=42797191,72,1
43218361 14 5 12 0 6 6 DoubleCheck=43218361,72,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

and I took these

And I took the two 47M exponents and the first 60M one.

My residue did not match for M42003697.

[QUOTE=cuBerBruce;412282]My residue did not match for M42003697.[/QUOTE]

As weird as this sounds, that's exactly what I like to hear. :smile: Strange to be rooting for *mis* matched residues with these.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;412065]For instance... here's one system in particular. I found one or two and then tested a couple more only to find that, pretty reliably, all of the ones I checked from this computer were winding up (probably) bad:[/QUOTE]
I picked up the rest of these.