[QUOTE=LookAS;411033]Triple-check needed M36166439[/QUOTE]
We [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36166439&full=1"]match[/URL]!

Requesting a triple check to a CUDALucas DC test
[url]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36459239&full=1[/url]

[QUOTE=UBR47K;411085]Requesting a triple check to a CUDALucas DC test
[url]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36459239&full=1[/url][/QUOTE]
got it, should be done in 9hrs.

[QUOTE=sdbardwick;411083]We [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36166439&full=1"]match[/URL]![/QUOTE]
cool


edit: could use triple-checking M37846999

[QUOTE=LookAS;411087]edit: could use triple-checking M37846999[/QUOTE]

I'm new to this so I just want to make sure I do this right. when you say triple check I assume the procedure is to go the the manual assignments page and reserve the exponent as a double check test it give this "DoubleCheck=<assignment id>,37846999,71,1" for your worker file and then you come here and say "I've got it" or something like that and then maybe a time estimate. I hope this is right cause I just did it.

Correct.
Or you could go directly in Prime95 to Advanced -> Test and add it there. Then do manual communication with server and it should become registered for you too.

[QUOTE=dragonbud20;411088]I'm new to this so I just want to make sure I do this right. when you say triple check I assume the procedure is to go the the manual assignments page and reserve the exponent as a double check test it give this "DoubleCheck=<AID>,37846999,71,1" for your worker file and then you come here and say "I've got it" or something like that and then maybe a time estimate. I hope this is right cause I just did it.[/QUOTE]

Correct, but do not post that assignment key publicly. Anyone on the internet may use it to unreserve your work. (Not that it's likely anyone is interested in doing such a thing, but still.)

[QUOTE=Dubslow;411091]Correct, but do not post that assignment key publicly. Anyone on the internet may use it to unreserve your work. (Not that it's likely anyone is interested in doing such a thing, but still.)[/QUOTE]

I fixed it, removed the ID from the post. :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;411050]
And here's a list of potentially bad results, but could use some extra TF before we bother double-checking:
[/QUOTE]
From this list I grabbed three with TF done for DC:
DoubleCheck=46234009,72,1
DoubleCheck=46423021,72,1
DoubleCheck=47204021,72,1

Aaron, have any of the misbehaving machines we found done other work types, such as TF or P-1?

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;411153]Aaron, have any of the misbehaving machines we found done other work types, such as TF or P-1?[/QUOTE]

Hmm... good question. I'm looking at just the LL results since that's the only thing where we can tell for sure if they were good/bad.

When I have some time I'll try and pick out a selection of the worst offenders who also did any P-1/ECM/TF work and try to get a feel for how they may have fared with those. I guess things like figuring out how many factors they found out of how many attempts, see if it seems "off".

[QUOTE=frmky;411123]From this list I grabbed three with TF done for DC:
[/QUOTE]
And these:
DoubleCheck=45308561,72,1
DoubleCheck=45379421,72,1
DoubleCheck=45379463,72,1
DoubleCheck=46371389,72,1
DoubleCheck=47267141,72,1
DoubleCheck=47267153,72,1