mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Marin's Mersenne-aries (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Strategic Double Clicking (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=20372)

cuBerBruce 2015-09-19 13:59

[QUOTE=Madpoo;410636]Just ran a daily query... there's a few more today that haven't been picked up. One is freshly expired and the other two got swept into the mix now that their bad count is high enough to fall into the "twice as many bad as good" category.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
35682739 10 5 5 6 4 7 DoubleCheck=35682739,71,1
37047167 10 5 5 6 4 7 DoubleCheck=37047167,71,1
40792733 3 1 2 2 2 2 DoubleCheck=40792733,72,1[/CODE]
[/QUOTE]

These have become assigned.

Madpoo 2015-09-21 00:59

Another list
 
Here's an updated list. First part is exponents from systems with at least 2x as many bad as good and already have 2 mismatches under their belt. The pair of exponents at the bottom were from systems with > 3x as many bad as good and one mismatch so far:
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
35551543 8 4 4 1 3 2 DoubleCheck=35551543,71,1
36459239 8 4 4 1 3 2 DoubleCheck=36459239,71,1
37720493 8 4 4 1 3 2 DoubleCheck=37720493,71,1
41065553 18 6 2 2 2 2 DoubleCheck=41065553,72,1
41069953 2 1 8 1 7 2 DoubleCheck=41069953,72,1
41079221 12 5 11 7 5 13 DoubleCheck=41079221,72,1
41079751 3 0 3 0 1 2 DoubleCheck=41079751,72,1
41106281 4 2 6 2 4 4 DoubleCheck=41106281,72,1
----------------
36166439 3 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=36166439,71,1
37846999 3 1 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=37846999,71,1[/CODE]

cuBerBruce 2015-09-21 01:50

[QUOTE=Madpoo;410934]Here's an updated list.[/QUOTE]


I grabbed M41106281.

EDIT: I grabbed M41079751, too.

UBR47K 2015-09-21 05:03

I took M36459239 and M37720493

LookAS 2015-09-21 06:57

I took M35551543, M36166439, M37846999

frmky 2015-09-21 07:07

And I grabbed the last 3.

LookAS 2015-09-22 09:45

Triple-check needed M36166439

Madpoo 2015-09-22 15:10

Extra TF love needed on these guys
 
Here's a small list of exponents that need a triple-check but could use some additional TF first:

[CODE]exponent TF WorkToDo
46941787 70 Factor=46941787,70,72
48372391 70 Factor=48372391,70,72
50404819 72 Factor=50404819,72,73
52086149 72 Factor=52086149,72,73
53401553 72 Factor=53401553,72,73[/CODE]

And here's a list of potentially bad results, but could use some extra TF before we bother double-checking:
[CODE]exponent TF WorkToDo
45307621 70 Factor=45307621,70,72
45308561 70 Factor=45308561,70,72
45379421 70 Factor=45379421,70,72
45379463 70 Factor=45379463,70,72
46234009 71 Factor=46234009,71,72
46371389 70 Factor=46371389,70,72
46423021 71 Factor=46423021,71,72
46607801 70 Factor=46607801,70,72
46607839 70 Factor=46607839,70,72
47204021 71 Factor=47204021,71,72
47267141 71 Factor=47267141,71,72
47267153 70 Factor=47267153,70,72
47346017 71 Factor=47346017,71,72
47346023 71 Factor=47346023,71,72
48104813 71 Factor=48104813,71,72
48226081 71 Factor=48226081,71,72
48248029 71 Factor=48248029,71,72
48451693 71 Factor=48451693,71,72
50398199 70 Factor=50398199,70,73
52040731 72 Factor=52040731,72,73
52405957 72 Factor=52405957,72,73
52939417 72 Factor=52939417,72,73
53401583 72 Factor=53401583,72,73
53562269 72 Factor=53562269,72,73
54170447 72 Factor=54170447,72,73
56868607 72 Factor=56868607,72,73
74049323 73 Factor=74049323,73,74[/CODE]

Madpoo 2015-09-22 15:16

[QUOTE=LookAS;411033]Triple-check needed M36166439[/QUOTE]

Looks like someone picked that up already.

I can't say for sure, because I'm not tracking the end result of these strategic double checks, but it seems like we're doing pretty good at picking out the ones that weren't done right the first time.

I've been trying to leave the juicier ones for everyone else, but even with the less probable work I've been selecting, I'm still getting a different result maybe 40-50% of the time (and of course assuming mine is correct).

I hope you all are getting equal or better results out of the lists I've been putting up... I'm hoping it's closer to 60-80% of the time you're (probably) proving the first result was wrong?

If you want to provide feedback on how it's been going, that would be good so I'll know if this is working out well or not. I should be keeping tabs on the exponents and checking in later to see if a match was made or not, but that sounded like too much work to do. LOL

sdbardwick 2015-09-22 15:21

[QUOTE=LookAS;411033]Triple-check needed M36166439[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;411051]Looks like someone picked that up already.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, had a potential coffee flood to avert just after I picked that one up and forgot to post. Should be done in 11 or 12 hours.

chalsall 2015-09-22 15:22

[QUOTE=Madpoo;411050]And here's a list of potentially bad results, but could use some extra TF before we bother double-checking:[/QUOTE]

OK, these are now in GPU72 and being assigned.


All times are UTC. The time now is 22:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.