Oh sorry, I did not realize it was your results from 2011/2012, I assumed you did the recent tests :blush:

New list of strategic DCs
 

Here's a fresh list... been a while since I generated one. :smile:

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk worktodo
49338631 3 0 1 DoubleCheck=49338631,73,1
48170179 2 1 1 DoubleCheck=48170179,73,1
56452489 2 1 2 DoubleCheck=56452489,73,1
53220901 6 3 2 DoubleCheck=53220901,73,1
53693557 6 3 2 DoubleCheck=53693557,73,1
48054023 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=48054023,73,1
44919103 1 1 2 DoubleCheck=44919103,73,1
48021133 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=48021133,73,1
53209469 1 1 4 DoubleCheck=53209469,73,1
53244671 1 1 4 DoubleCheck=53244671,73,1
53262973 1 1 4 DoubleCheck=53262973,73,1
47857427 1 0 3 DoubleCheck=47857427,73,1
50065693 1 0 3 DoubleCheck=50065693,74,1
50067271 1 0 3 DoubleCheck=50067271,73,1
46657007 1 0 2 DoubleCheck=46657007,73,1
55613359 1 0 3 DoubleCheck=55613359,73,1
56971351 1 0 3 DoubleCheck=56971351,73,1
44555123 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=44555123,73,1
53752333 1 0 7 DoubleCheck=53752333,73,1
53752411 1 0 7 DoubleCheck=53752411,73,1
53803909 1 0 7 DoubleCheck=53803909,73,1
53809909 1 0 7 DoubleCheck=53809909,73,1
46997201 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=46997201,73,1
48140947 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=48140947,73,1
48903901 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=48903901,73,1
53067347 1 1 5 DoubleCheck=53067347,73,1
53084041 1 1 5 DoubleCheck=53084041,73,1
47871751 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=47871751,73,1
50436343 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=50436343,73,1
51493367 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=51493367,73,1
47934023 3 3 3 DoubleCheck=47934023,73,1
47934053 3 3 3 DoubleCheck=47934053,73,1
48061693 3 3 3 DoubleCheck=48061693,73,1
48098579 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=48098579,73,1
48194297 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=48194297,73,1
50029663 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=50029663,75,1
51191279 1 1 3 DoubleCheck=51191279,73,1
44435179 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=44435179,73,1
47982943 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=47982943,73,1
46827643 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=46827643,73,1
51652343 1 0 11 DoubleCheck=51652343,73,1
54192319 1 0 11 DoubleCheck=54192319,73,1
54193361 1 0 11 DoubleCheck=54193361,73,1
54687257 1 0 11 DoubleCheck=54687257,73,1
54697271 1 0 11 DoubleCheck=54697271,73,1
54697589 1 0 11 DoubleCheck=54697589,73,1
47658943 1 0 2 DoubleCheck=47658943,73,1
46857169 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=46857169,73,1
47192567 1 0 1 DoubleCheck=47192567,73,1
49248469 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=49248469,73,1
49368733 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=49368733,73,1
49331197 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=49331197,73,1
56356529 1 0 2 DoubleCheck=56356529,73,1
46479337 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=46479337,73,1
47988641 1 0 2 DoubleCheck=47988641,73,1
47993807 1 0 2 DoubleCheck=47993807,73,1
49612637 1 1 2 DoubleCheck=49612637,73,1
48050047 3 4 1 DoubleCheck=48050047,73,1
53203279 3 5 1 DoubleCheck=53203279,73,1
56075977 3 5 9 DoubleCheck=56075977,73,1
56077591 3 5 9 DoubleCheck=56077591,73,1
56639827 3 5 9 DoubleCheck=56639827,73,1
56757367 3 5 9 DoubleCheck=56757367,73,1
56954519 3 5 9 DoubleCheck=56954519,73,1
55747099 6 10 4 DoubleCheck=55747099,73,1
55747343 6 10 4 DoubleCheck=55747343,73,1
55747357 6 10 4 DoubleCheck=55747357,73,1
55094381 3 5 6 DoubleCheck=55094381,73,1
55094587 3 5 6 DoubleCheck=55094587,73,1
55094861 3 5 6 DoubleCheck=55094861,73,1
56372383 3 5 6 DoubleCheck=56372383,73,1
56372419 3 5 6 DoubleCheck=56372419,73,1
52657963 1 2 5 DoubleCheck=52657963,73,1
52693981 1 2 5 DoubleCheck=52693981,73,1
50448733 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=50448733,73,1
50311271 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=50311271,73,1
50558293 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=50558293,73,1
48194101 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=48194101,73,1
50929397 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=50929397,73,1
49721587 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=49721587,73,1
48064637 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=48064637,73,1
46199191 1 2 9 DoubleCheck=46199191,73,1
46584749 1 2 9 DoubleCheck=46584749,73,1
46954541 1 2 9 DoubleCheck=46954541,73,1
53239229 1 2 9 DoubleCheck=53239229,73,1
53357587 1 2 9 DoubleCheck=53357587,73,1
55324459 1 2 9 DoubleCheck=55324459,73,1
47933653 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=47933653,73,1
47223947 2 4 1 DoubleCheck=47223947,73,1
47409121 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=47409121,73,1
47920463 1 2 3 DoubleCheck=47920463,73,1
50148739 1 2 3 DoubleCheck=50148739,73,1
55251473 2 4 1 DoubleCheck=55251473,73,1
54929429 1 2 6 DoubleCheck=54929429,73,1
54929837 1 2 6 DoubleCheck=54929837,73,1
54931127 1 2 6 DoubleCheck=54931127,73,1
54932029 1 2 6 DoubleCheck=54932029,73,1
54938327 1 2 6 DoubleCheck=54938327,73,1
52855423 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=52855423,73,1
57799921 1 2 2 DoubleCheck=57799921,74,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;487719]Here's a fresh list... been a while since I generated one. :smile:
[/QUOTE]

I took all which wasn't assigned already.

The 55M++ worth taken to 74 bits before DC. Anybody with a free GPU? :)

Reserving all 55M+ and included, to be taken to 74. In fact, you can start DC, no conflict. If I find a factor I will post it here so you can cancel.

[QUOTE=LaurV;487755]The 55M++ worth taken to 74 bits before DC. Anybody with a free GPU? :)

Reserving all 55M+ and included, to be taken to 74. In fact, you can start DC, no conflict. If I find a factor I will post it here so you can cancel.[/QUOTE]

Yay...that will directly help my "little" project here.

[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=22476[/url]

[QUOTE=petrw1;487759]Yay...that will directly help my "little" project here.

[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=22476[/url][/QUOTE]

Here are some factoring stats if you are interested:
[url]http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/GIMPSstats.html[/url]

I have been archiving the report from [url]https://www.mersenne.org/primenet/[/url]
and my script now automatically sum all the columns and compare to my old archive and generate that report.

[QUOTE=ATH;487765]Here are some factoring stats if you are interested:
[URL]http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/GIMPSstats.html[/URL]
[/QUOTE]

Very nice.

How does PRP figure in the stats, if at all?

PRP and PRP DC are currently included in the LL and LL-D columns. I do not know if there are future plans to make PRP columns?

[QUOTE=LaurV;487755]The 55M++ worth taken to 74 bits before DC. Anybody with a free GPU? :)

Reserving all 55M+ and included, to be taken to 74. In fact, you can start DC, no conflict. If I find a factor I will post it here so you can cancel.[/QUOTE]

Actually I think, since many people are factoring for fun more than to the probabilistic sensible limits, the auto-assignment should also use the "currently wanted" factoring limits rather than the calculated ones. This could safe some wasted LL time.

Currently about 1.6% of my own LL tests were wasted because a factor was found later. Not really much but it will increase even more I guess.

So instead of auto-assigning factoring work from far away exponent ranges, we could factor current LL-relevant ranges to higher limits. (Of course only for people who are factoring only.)

[QUOTE=rudi_m;487792]Actually I think, since many people are factoring for fun more than to the probabilistic sensible limits, the auto-assignment should also use the "currently wanted" factoring limits rather than the calculated ones. This could safe some wasted LL time.

Currently about 1.6% of my own LL tests were wasted because a factor was found later. Not really much but it will increase even more I guess.

So instead of auto-assigning factoring work from far away exponent ranges, we could factor current LL-relevant ranges to higher limits. (Of course only for people who are factoring only.)[/QUOTE]

Don't forget the P-1 relevant-ranges, too. I believe that's where most of the TF is currently happening.

[QUOTE=rudi_m;487792]Actually I think, since many people are factoring for fun more than to the probabilistic sensible limits, the auto-assignment should also use the "currently wanted" factoring limits rather than the calculated ones. This could safe some wasted LL time.

Currently about 1.6% of my own LL tests were wasted because a factor was found later. Not really much but it will increase even more I guess.

So instead of auto-assigning factoring work from far away exponent ranges, we could factor current LL-relevant ranges to higher limits. (Of course only for people who are factoring only.)[/QUOTE]

That's a fair point; however, at [url]www.gpu72.com[/url] Chris is managing the LL-TF and DC-TF ranges.

If I understand correctly they are taking the current LL-relevant ranges at least as deep as recommended for GPUs and they are a fair bit ahead.

About a year ago Chris started discussion on What to do next:
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=22480[/url]