[QUOTE=petrw1;483228]He seems to have access to a LOT!!! of computers.[/QUOTE]

It's [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=23183"]this guy[/URL]. 120 [cores?] and 6TB of memory!

[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M44585069"]44585069[/URL] needs a triple check.

[QUOTE=moebius;484314][URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M44585069"]44585069[/URL] needs a triple check.[/QUOTE]
I got this one.

[QUOTE=endless mike;482337]I do wonder about the seven assignments that were being worked on during the freezes. Those are here.

[CODE]DoubleCheck=[M]70328581[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]70804673[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]71705971[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]71909627[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]72813683[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]73910377[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]74177821[/M],75,1
[/CODE]
[/QUOTE]

All seven are verified good.

[QUOTE=GP2;484462]All seven are verified good.[/QUOTE]

A little off-topic, but I assume your PrimeNet name is "kkmrkkblmbrbk"? If so, does it stand for anything?

[QUOTE=ixfd64;484480]A little off-topic, but I assume your PrimeNet name is "kkmrkkblmbrbk"? If so, does it stand for anything?[/QUOTE]

It's a disemvoweled phrase from a secret language so secret that even the inventors refused to figure out what it means.

[QUOTE=moebius;484314][URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M44585069"]44585069[/URL] needs a triple check.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;484317]I got this one.[/QUOTE]I matched with the most recent other check.

[QUOTE=GP2;484490]It's a [B][U]disemvoweled[/U][/B] phrase from a secret language so secret that even the inventors refused to figure out what it means.[/QUOTE]
ROFL!

Madpoo, some new missed factors have identified a couple of users whose CPUs may have been misbehaving: [url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=485191&postcount=452[/url]

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;485253]Madpoo, some new missed factors have identified a couple of users whose CPUs may have been misbehaving: [url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=485191&postcount=452[/url][/QUOTE]

Hmm... interesting. It's a bunch of users too.

My queries aren't really setup to find users who missed factors unfortunately. I took a look at that once, but the way the historic data is stored, it would take a lot of extra parsing to dig into that and figure out which range a user did and whether a factor in that same range was found later by someone else. it's easy to spot for humans, but yeah, doing it in a program is just one of those things I didn't have time to work on in depth. :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;485601]Hmm... interesting. It's a bunch of users too.

My queries aren't really setup to find users who missed factors unfortunately. I took a look at that once, but the way the historic data is stored, it would take a lot of extra parsing to dig into that and figure out which range a user did and whether a factor in that same range was found later by someone else. it's easy to spot for humans, but yeah, doing it in a program is just one of those things I didn't have time to work on in depth. :smile:[/QUOTE]

I know George was able to figure out which CPUs did previously poor TF, and we both redid the TF work from those CPUs and DC'ed work from those CPUs. As far as I know, the CPU that reported work isn't available through the XML, so it has to be someone on the inside who figures out what work should be redone.