[QUOTE=Madpoo;407741][code]
41174801 22 0 8 8 DoubleCheck=41174801,72,1
46583549 4 0 1 5 DoubleCheck=46583549,72,1
44259209 4 0 3 1 DoubleCheck=44259209,72,1
47525339 4 0 3 1 DoubleCheck=47525339,72,1
48014221 3 0 1 3 DoubleCheck=48014221,72,1
51521941 3 0 5 2 DoubleCheck=51521941,73,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I've now taken all of these though I don't know if they've had enough TF done.

I've taken those in posts #149 and #150, plus those in #153 below 45 million. Thanks, madpoo.

[QUOTE=Prime95;407797]I've now taken all of these though I don't know if they've had enough TF done.[/QUOTE]

They look appropriately TF'ed.

This little gem just became available (old assignment expired). I'm fairly certain it was done wrong the first time.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus worktodo
41019989 22 0 8 8 DoubleCheck=41019989,72,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;408045]This little gem just became available (old assignment expired). I'm fairly certain it was done wrong the first time.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus worktodo
41019989 22 0 8 8 DoubleCheck=41019989,72,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I'll take it.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;408045][CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus worktodo
41019989 22 0 8 8 DoubleCheck=41019989,72,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]I must have missed something : when I look at LL results or full detailed status for that exponent I see only one unverified LL test. Where are the other 37 LL attempts ? I have the same question about 41174801 and for 47106793 that is supposed to have had more thant 80 results.

Jacob

[QUOTE=S485122;408064]I must have missed something [...][/QUOTE]
I thought I'd missed something too, but I think the solution to our confusion lies in the first post of this thread:
[QUOTE=Madpoo;406319][...]I'm doing an analysis of [I]computers[/I] to see which of them have had a sketchy track record, and return unusually high #'s of bad residues.[...][/QUOTE]
So those numerous bad or suspect tests have been done by the same machine which turned in the single test on that one exponent. But they were done on other exponents.

[QUOTE=Brian-E;408069]So those numerous bad or suspect tests have been done by the same machine which turned in the single test on that one exponent. But they were done on other exponents.[/QUOTE]Eureka !

I should have read the beginning of the thread again. Thanks !

Jacob

[QUOTE=Brian-E;408069]But they were done on other exponents.[/QUOTE]
Namely, not including those deemed bad due to mismatch with exceptional machines, 33353981, 33899219, 33995837, 34012283, 34051943, 34109443, 34219027, 34219061, 34239521, 34287101, 34360253, 34594279, 34668677, 34899911, 36648329, 37381459, 37462097, 37751843, and 38126657.

Looks like I hogged the TF assignments....
 

Anyway my DC-TF will all be completed Friday morning.
Seems I have all the remaining 43M.

If there are any more of these that need TF work done I'm happy to help.