[QUOTE=Madpoo;461551]Yeah, I did a spot check of another one but it matched, so maybe I just hit a few bad ones as a result of my triple-checking.

I may check it out again or just do another roundup of "maybe bad, but let's test one more and see" kind of work.[/QUOTE]

I hope to have my new rig up and running sometime late tomorrow afternoon. If so, I'll pluck one from the shorter list just above and give it a go. I would like to be able to do DC's in the 70 hour range with exponents of this magnitude.

Finished 40 previously queued exponents in the 50M~55M region. Checking the results once every few days I estimated 40% are mismatches. Hoping Madpoo can pick those triple checks up.

Also queued up all available exponents under 70M.

[QUOTE=nofaith628;461735]Finished 40 previously queued exponents in the 50M~55M region. Checking the results once every few days I estimated 40% are mismatches. Hoping Madpoo can pick those triple checks up.

Also queued up all available exponents under 70M.[/QUOTE]

You missed these 64:

DoubleCheck=54441767,73,1
DoubleCheck=54872291,73,1
DoubleCheck=55006123,73,1
DoubleCheck=55061443,73,1
DoubleCheck=55061557,73,1
DoubleCheck=55100737,73,1
DoubleCheck=55297247,73,1
DoubleCheck=55298843,73,1
DoubleCheck=55329581,73,1
DoubleCheck=55398199,73,1
DoubleCheck=55449209,73,1
DoubleCheck=55684813,73,1
DoubleCheck=55735451,73,1
DoubleCheck=55816259,73,1
DoubleCheck=55894973,73,1
DoubleCheck=55956871,73,1
DoubleCheck=55983827,73,1
DoubleCheck=56004757,73,1
DoubleCheck=56041319,73,1
DoubleCheck=56088629,73,1
DoubleCheck=56133191,73,1
DoubleCheck=56566841,73,1
DoubleCheck=56604923,73,1
DoubleCheck=56625053,74,1
DoubleCheck=56644061,73,1
DoubleCheck=56717519,73,1
DoubleCheck=56736437,73,1
DoubleCheck=56759347,73,1
DoubleCheck=56965847,73,1
DoubleCheck=57091651,73,1
DoubleCheck=57120929,73,1
DoubleCheck=57143657,73,1
DoubleCheck=57215933,73,1
DoubleCheck=57238343,73,1
DoubleCheck=57255067,73,1
DoubleCheck=57374939,73,1
DoubleCheck=57404041,73,1
DoubleCheck=57423991,73,1
DoubleCheck=57435919,73,1
DoubleCheck=57511813,73,1
DoubleCheck=57577297,73,1
DoubleCheck=58827649,74,1
DoubleCheck=58828267,74,1
DoubleCheck=59001001,74,1
DoubleCheck=59083699,74,1
DoubleCheck=59279057,73,1
DoubleCheck=59332439,73,1
DoubleCheck=59350231,73,1
DoubleCheck=59378471,73,1
DoubleCheck=59441087,73,1
DoubleCheck=59485343,75,1
DoubleCheck=59574169,73,1
DoubleCheck=59593223,73,1
DoubleCheck=59599873,73,1
DoubleCheck=59616719,74,1
DoubleCheck=59616919,73,1
DoubleCheck=59626481,73,1
DoubleCheck=59644603,73,1
DoubleCheck=59695201,73,1
DoubleCheck=59703341,73,1
DoubleCheck=59734183,73,1
DoubleCheck=59746667,73,1
DoubleCheck=59844329,73,1
DoubleCheck=59994863,73,1

And there's one remaining higher exponent:

DoubleCheck=72629587,75,1

That is a big list. Must've missed it in the previous posts. Wish there was an easier method for us users to obtain these double checks.

Queued these up and it should be busy for the next month or two. :tu:

[QUOTE=nofaith628;461747]Wish there was an easier method for us users to obtain these double checks.[/QUOTE]

Agreed. It would be so easy to add a database column to the exponents table to be manually marked by MadPoo. Then add a new work type for SDC. Restrict SDC work to Cat 0/1/2 DC elligible machines, and prevent SDC exponents from being returned as DC assignments (to stop unproven/slow machines from sitting on them). If there are no SDC exponents available for a machine, send DC work.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;461777]It would be so easy to add a database column to the exponents table to be manually marked by MadPoo.[/QUOTE]

It could also be a separate table "JOIN"'ed into the query. And MadPoo's heuristics could be codified.

I suggest worktype 42 not listed anywhere but in this thread :smile:

[QUOTE]0 - Whatever makes the most sense
1 - Trial factoring to low limits
2 - Trial factoring
4 - P-1 factoring
5 - ECM on small Mersenne numbers
6 - ECM on Fermat numbers
42 - Strategic Double Checking
100 - First time primality tests
101 - Double-checking
102 - World record primality tests
104 - 100 million digit primality tests[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;461777]Agreed...Then add a new work type for SDC. Restrict SDC work to Cat 0/1/2 DC elligible machines....[/QUOTE]

Can you elaborate on what "Cat 0/1/2" is?

[QUOTE=storm5510;461940]Can you elaborate on what "Cat 0/1/2" is?[/QUOTE]

CATegory as explained here: [url]https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/[/url]

Here's a list of exponents from two different CPUs that might be bad, might be good... they currently have bad > good but they also have a bunch of unknowns. These are the smallest exponents for each month of their history to try and get more data (one of them is the same I mentioned before... I think one more bad one came in since then, I forget).

Anyway, it's speculative... they may have had a few bad months, but only one way to know. :smile:

[CODE]Exponent Bad Good Unk worktodo
51954559 1 1 14 DoubleCheck=51954559,73,1
54274777 1 3 10 DoubleCheck=54274777,73,1
57436123 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=57436123,73,1
58214027 0 1 8 DoubleCheck=58214027,73,1
58409573 1 1 8 DoubleCheck=58409573,73,1
58892083 3 4 4 DoubleCheck=58892083,73,1
60006059 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=60006059,74,1
60464567 0 1 8 DoubleCheck=60464567,74,1
68017879 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=68017879,74,1
68024321 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=68024321,74,1
68054159 0 0 9 DoubleCheck=68054159,74,1
68831353 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=68831353,74,1
69513853 8 5 3 DoubleCheck=69513853,74,1
69803893 1 0 16 DoubleCheck=69803893,74,1
69804299 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=69804299,74,1
69804797 0 0 15 DoubleCheck=69804797,74,1
72435029 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=72435029,75,1
72436307 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=72436307,75,1
72436549 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=72436549,75,1
74417641 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=74417641,75,1
74417689 0 0 8 DoubleCheck=74417689,75,1
74760641 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=74760641,75,1
74761439 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=74761439,75,1
74762833 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=74762833,75,1
75002269 0 0 15 DoubleCheck=75002269,75,1
75003743 0 0 10 DoubleCheck=75003743,75,1
76079023 0 0 20 DoubleCheck=76079023,75,1
76081543 0 0 14 DoubleCheck=76081543,75,1
76083373 0 0 13 DoubleCheck=76083373,75,1
77075717 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=77075717,75,1
77075851 0 0 9 DoubleCheck=77075851,75,1
77076313 0 0 7 DoubleCheck=77076313,75,1
77076631 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=77076631,75,1
77076719 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=77076719,75,1
77498219 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=77498219,75,1
77498567 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=77498567,75,1
78990157 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=78990157,75,1
78990361 0 0 12 DoubleCheck=78990361,75,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;462043]Here's a list of exponents from two different CPUs that might be bad, might be good... they currently have bad > good but they also have a bunch of unknowns. These are the smallest exponents for each month of their history to try and get more data (one of them is the same I mentioned before... I think one more bad one came in since then, I forget).

Anyway, it's speculative... they may have had a few bad months, but only one way to know. :smile:

[CODE]Exponent Bad Good Unk worktodo
51954559 1 1 14 DoubleCheck=51954559,73,1
54274777 1 3 10 DoubleCheck=54274777,73,1
57436123 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=57436123,73,1
58214027 0 1 8 DoubleCheck=58214027,73,1
58409573 1 1 8 DoubleCheck=58409573,73,1
58892083 3 4 4 DoubleCheck=58892083,73,1
60006059 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=60006059,74,1
60464567 0 1 8 DoubleCheck=60464567,74,1
68017879 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=68017879,74,1
68024321 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=68024321,74,1
68054159 0 0 9 DoubleCheck=68054159,74,1
68831353 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=68831353,74,1
69513853 8 5 3 DoubleCheck=69513853,74,1
69803893 1 0 16 DoubleCheck=69803893,74,1
69804299 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=69804299,74,1
69804797 0 0 15 DoubleCheck=69804797,74,1
72435029 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=72435029,75,1
72436307 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=72436307,75,1
72436549 0 0 17 DoubleCheck=72436549,75,1
74417641 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=74417641,75,1
74417689 0 0 8 DoubleCheck=74417689,75,1
74760641 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=74760641,75,1
74761439 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=74761439,75,1
74762833 0 0 4 DoubleCheck=74762833,75,1
75002269 0 0 15 DoubleCheck=75002269,75,1
75003743 0 0 10 DoubleCheck=75003743,75,1
76079023 0 0 20 DoubleCheck=76079023,75,1
76081543 0 0 14 DoubleCheck=76081543,75,1
76083373 0 0 13 DoubleCheck=76083373,75,1
77075717 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=77075717,75,1
77075851 0 0 9 DoubleCheck=77075851,75,1
77076313 0 0 7 DoubleCheck=77076313,75,1
77076631 0 0 5 DoubleCheck=77076631,75,1
77076719 0 0 6 DoubleCheck=77076719,75,1
77498219 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=77498219,75,1
77498567 0 0 2 DoubleCheck=77498567,75,1
78990157 0 0 11 DoubleCheck=78990157,75,1
78990361 0 0 12 DoubleCheck=78990361,75,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

[B]I'll take the top two and add them to my queue in Prime95.[/B]

Done: I should have results on the first this coming Saturday; the second on July 4.