[QUOTE=Madpoo;456975]That was a count of all systems that have returned at least one LL result, but so far none of their results have been verified (or proven bad).[/QUOTE]

But as GP2 pointed out, those systems that only turned in 1 LL result ever will not be very interesting to double check, at least it will not be very "strategic" double checking. How many of those are there in the 13,683 machines?

[QUOTE=ATH;456978]But as GP2 pointed out, those systems that only turned in 1 LL result ever will not be very interesting to double check, at least it will not be very "strategic" double checking. How many of those are there in the 13,683 machines?[/QUOTE]

As of right now:
[CODE]13,651 total don't have any DC'd result
10,088 of those have 2+ results
4,518 have 5+ results
2,267 have 10+ results
782 have 20+ results
137 have 50+ results
36 have 100+ results
6 have 150+ results
[/CODE]

Of those 6 with 150+ results (and not a DC'd result among them) here are 4 exponents that represent the lowest available. I excluded any CPU where someone's already doing a DC of any of their work.

[CODE]Exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
50162537 0 0 167 0 167 0 DoubleCheck=50162537,73,1
50190247 0 0 150 0 150 0 DoubleCheck=50190247,73,1
51464701 0 0 155 0 155 0 DoubleCheck=51464701,73,1
57849343 0 0 159 0 159 0 DoubleCheck=57849343,73,1[/CODE]

3 of those 4 are Curtis machines which explains the large amount of work.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;457297]Of those 6 with 150+ results (and not a DC'd result among them) here are 4 exponents that represent the lowest available. I excluded any CPU where someone's already doing a DC of any of their work.[/QUOTE]

Fascinating. Any machine that's prolific enough to turn in 150+ results should have done one of the new automatic once-yearly double checks on its own by now, unless that setting was deliberately turned off or unless the machine is no longer active.

This does look like a promising vein to pursue, although the fact that the fourth-lowest exponent jumps all the way to 57M suggests that most of these exponents will be in the fairly large ranges.

Anyways, I grabbed these four.

All the exponents from the thread are already queued/done. If we're out of normal SDCs, that would be a good list to post (perhaps from the 50+ machines).

[QUOTE=GP2;457316]Fascinating. Any machine that's prolific enough to turn in 150+ results should have done one of the new automatic once-yearly double checks on its own by now, unless that setting was deliberately turned off or unless the machine is no longer active.

This does look like a promising vein to pursue, although the fact that the fourth-lowest exponent jumps all the way to 57M suggests that most of these exponents will be in the fairly large ranges.

Anyways, I grabbed these four.[/QUOTE]

Many of those CPUs are probably older and don't participate anymore. Otherwise I imagine they would have picked up the occasional DC by now. It's also telling that none of these have ever turned in a "suspect" result either since that would have triggered a DC of their result much earlier.

That's not to say that a system with no suspect results is always good... in fact there are quite a few bad results out there where the system thought everything was fine. Some of them turned in all bad results and not a single one was suspect. :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo]<snip>[/QUOTE]
[STRIKE]The accountant in me: somehow the numbers in that table do not add up... :razz:
Is the first row (13k) machines with a [U]single[/U] LL done (as it seems from the numbers), or the total (as I understand from the surrounding text)? (the issue may be with my English)[/STRIKE]

Edit: Scrap that, I just realized that the categories are not exclusive. The 2+ includes 5+, of course.... :davieddy: If there are 5 or more, then there are 2 or more too... Need more coffee...

[QUOTE=Madpoo;456008]Cool. Yeah, I figured that large one is in no immediate need of a strategic double check anyway, but figured I'd include it just to be thorough. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Turns out 102141577 needs a triple check.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;457983]Turns out 102141577 needs a triple check.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, saw that and picked it up.

Here's a new list of the top 100 exponents ordered by that cpu's total bad/good ratio.

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
78464039 8 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=78464039,75,1
40484341 7 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40484341,72,1
75458441 5 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=75458441,75,1
76565029 5 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76565029,75,1
76565473 5 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76565473,75,1
76565663 5 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76565663,75,1
76565837 5 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=76565837,75,1
78247601 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=78247601,75,1
78325889 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=78325889,75,1
78343427 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=78343427,75,1
78354667 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=78354667,75,1
78435713 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=78435713,75,1
78595963 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=78595963,75,1
79374233 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=79374233,75,1
79517539 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=79517539,75,1
79594373 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=79594373,75,1
79829011 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=79829011,75,1
80036263 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=80036263,75,1
80053069 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=80053069,75,1
80070589 5 1 13 0 13 0 DoubleCheck=80070589,75,1
75226579 4 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=75226579,75,1
54460597 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=54460597,73,1
55474673 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=55474673,73,1
55524773 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=55524773,73,1
55657067 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=55657067,73,1
55835551 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=55835551,73,1
55980481 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=55980481,73,1
56735933 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=56735933,73,1
56926579 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=56926579,73,1
58037909 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=58037909,73,1
59214593 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=59214593,73,1
59908361 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=59908361,73,1
60552893 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=60552893,74,1
61311953 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=61311953,74,1
61469383 133 41 24 0 22 2 DoubleCheck=61469383,74,1
75847703 6 2 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75847703,75,1
75856579 6 2 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=75856579,75,1
76351169 6 2 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=76351169,75,1
77116451 6 2 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=77116451,75,1
78111461 3 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=78111461,75,1
79503253 3 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=79503253,75,1
80356853 3 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=80356853,75,1
75649417 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75649417,75,1
79593601 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=79593601,75,1
74711501 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=74711501,76,1
76895393 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=76895393,75,1
78551183 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=78551183,75,1
78993269 3 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=78993269,75,1
70131329 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=70131329,75,1
70602353 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=70602353,75,1
72001729 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=72001729,75,1
73028581 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=73028581,75,1
73029409 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=73029409,75,1
74066401 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=74066401,75,1
74767633 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=74767633,75,1
75253049 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=75253049,75,1
75722363 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=75722363,75,1
75843913 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=75843913,75,1
75850783 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=75850783,75,1
77021183 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=77021183,75,1
77030879 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=77030879,75,1
78142787 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=78142787,75,1
78224677 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=78224677,75,1
78226651 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=78226651,75,1
78229273 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=78229273,75,1
79017877 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=79017877,75,1
79017889 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=79017889,75,1
79018187 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=79018187,75,1
79018309 3 1 22 0 22 0 DoubleCheck=79018309,75,1
77293871 42 15 1 1 2 0 DoubleCheck=77293871,75,1
77463277 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=77463277,75,1
77570957 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=77570957,75,1
77808737 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=77808737,75,1
78141127 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78141127,75,1
78212293 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78212293,75,1
78244297 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78244297,75,1
78328181 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78328181,75,1
78448613 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78448613,75,1
78479413 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78479413,75,1
78607747 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78607747,75,1
78700397 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78700397,75,1
78807727 27 12 8 5 12 1 DoubleCheck=78807727,75,1
78428699 8 4 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=78428699,75,1
77725871 6 3 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=77725871,75,1
61626077 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=61626077,74,1
62632363 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=62632363,74,1
62634337 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=62634337,74,1
64433371 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=64433371,74,1
65280883 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=65280883,74,1
65446441 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=65446441,74,1
66847993 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=66847993,74,1
67476193 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=67476193,74,1
67878047 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=67878047,74,1
67878137 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=67878137,74,1
67878289 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=67878289,74,1
67878389 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=67878389,74,1
68839013 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=68839013,74,1
68924729 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=68924729,74,1
69826747 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=69826747,74,1
69846011 4 2 18 1 19 0 DoubleCheck=69846011,74,1[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;457993]
Here's a new list of the top 100 exponents ordered by that cpu's total bad/good ratio.
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I took all below 60M.

I took the remaining below 77M.

Here is one I am not happy with, [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=76453229&full=1"]M76453229[/URL]. I ran both tests and the residues matched on the way, but one is clLucas and one is gpuOwl, both with null shift, in the same card (HD7970). Most probably (99.999999%, hehe) my residue is right, but a "shifted" check won't hurt.