I took these:

[CODE]
54201487 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=54201487,73,1
54697597 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=54697597,73,1
54702709 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=54702709,73,1
55716697 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=55716697,73,1
56104721 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=56104721,73,1
56664947 2 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=56664947,73,1
56669819 2 1 6 0 6 0 DoubleCheck=56669819,73,1
57103121 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=57103121,73,1
57115549 2 0 9 0 9 0 DoubleCheck=57115549,73,1
57753071 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=57753071,73,1
[/CODE]

That leaves every exponent above 60M not taken.

I'm also going to TF 102141577 to 78 as it needs it.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;455995]I'm also going to TF 102141577 to 78 as it needs it.[/QUOTE]

Cool. Yeah, I figured that large one is in no immediate need of a strategic double check anyway, but figured I'd include it just to be thorough. :smile:

Taking those free below 70M:
[QUOTE=Madpoo;455987][CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
61999547 2 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=61999547,74,1
62026201 2 1 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=62026201,74,1
62089483 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62089483,74,1
62121461 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62121461,74,1
62132173 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=62132173,74,1
63613633 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=63613633,74,1
67982251 4 2 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=67982251,74,1
69072589 4 2 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=69072589,74,1
69675829 2 1 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=69675829,75,1[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Here's another small list... I may work up a larger list in the next day or so. There's a particular system with 20 or so solo-checked exponents in the 50-60M range that has a lifetime bad/good of something like 3.2, so I'm going to look at it on a monthly or maybe annual period of time to see if it's specific to certain time frames, or just randomly bad. :smile:

Anyway, here's what I have for now...
[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
44732851 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=44732851,72,1
47843413 5 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47843413,72,1
48007301 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48007301,72,1
48095939 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48095939,72,1
60137047 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=60137047,74,1
63135973 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=63135973,74,1
65406479 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=65406479,74,1
67612459 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=67612459,74,1
69103981 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=69103981,74,1[/CODE]

I took these:

[CODE]44732851 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=44732851,72,1
47843413 5 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=47843413,72,1
48007301 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48007301,72,1
48095939 2 1 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=48095939,72,1
[/CODE]

My aging Macbook Pro appreciates the smaller exponents.

I took the others.

There are still a bunch of higher exponents needing a DC:

DoubleCheck=70092619,75,1
DoubleCheck=70161713,75,1
DoubleCheck=70832389,75,1
DoubleCheck=71086529,75,1
DoubleCheck=71172973,75,1
DoubleCheck=71425229,75,1
DoubleCheck=72246919,75,1
DoubleCheck=72502609,75,1
DoubleCheck=73172117,75,1
DoubleCheck=73749323,75,1
DoubleCheck=74745511,75,1
DoubleCheck=75295921,75,1
DoubleCheck=75297433,75,1
DoubleCheck=75854473,75,1
DoubleCheck=76096117,75,1
DoubleCheck=76535383,75,1
DoubleCheck=76763689,75,1
DoubleCheck=76809221,75,1
DoubleCheck=76995497,75,1
DoubleCheck=77042887,75,1
DoubleCheck=77158759,75,1
DoubleCheck=77162959,75,1
DoubleCheck=77171453,75,1
DoubleCheck=77429719,75,1
DoubleCheck=77486203,75,1
DoubleCheck=78207133,75,1
DoubleCheck=78212821,75,1
DoubleCheck=78217757,75,1
DoubleCheck=78232829,75,1
DoubleCheck=78251143,75,1
DoubleCheck=78313519,75,1
DoubleCheck=78830501,75,1
DoubleCheck=79105139,75,1

"fake primes":

DoubleCheck=73601597,75,1
DoubleCheck=75915529,75,1
DoubleCheck=76044851,75,1
DoubleCheck=76044887,75,1
DoubleCheck=76888337,75,1
DoubleCheck=76981741,75,1
DoubleCheck=76981937,75,1
DoubleCheck=77131357,75,1
DoubleCheck=77205589,75,1
DoubleCheck=77208421,75,1
DoubleCheck=77256713,75,1
DoubleCheck=77344859,75,1
DoubleCheck=77391121,75,1
DoubleCheck=77505401,75,1
DoubleCheck=78121339,75,1
DoubleCheck=79781327,75,1
DoubleCheck=79788043,75,1

Taking all of the "fake primes" from the post above this one.

Thank you very much kind sir I'll be grabbing these :)

[CODE]
DoubleCheck=71086529,75,1
DoubleCheck=71172973,75,1
DoubleCheck=71425229,75,1
DoubleCheck=72246919,75,1
DoubleCheck=72502609,75,1
DoubleCheck=73172117,75,1
DoubleCheck=73749323,75,1
DoubleCheck=74745511,75,1
DoubleCheck=75295921,75,1
DoubleCheck=75297433,75,1
DoubleCheck=75854473,75,1
[/CODE]

Edit:
Looks like someone is already working on these three:
[CODE]
DoubleCheck=70092619,75,1
DoubleCheck=70161713,75,1
DoubleCheck=70832389,75,1
[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;456536]There are still a bunch of higher exponents needing a DC:
[/QUOTE]

Speaking for me and maybe for others too, the higher exponents (say >70M) are not really interesting for me. To increase the "strategic double checking throughput" you need to give us more smaller ones ;)