[QUOTE=ATH;439593]I have been keeping a list and updating it with all the exponents from this thread. Once in a while I run a script to check the status of the exponents:

Right now there are 737 exponents from the list that are available that still does not have a successful double check:
[URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/available.html"]available.html[/URL]

and there are 304 exponents currently assigned:
[URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/assigned.html"]assigned.html[/URL]

and there are 1943 exponents we have successfully double checked. That is very nice to see:
[URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/verified.html"]verified.html[/URL][/QUOTE]

I was wondering why I kept seeing your name pop up with active assignments throughout the exponents. I guess I just duplicated all your work, except I've divided it between double and triple checks (I've done it for all the exponents, but I haven't posted the lists above 50M).

[QUOTE=ATH;439593]I have been keeping a list and updating it with all the exponents from this thread. Once in a while I run a script to check the status of the exponents:

Right now there are 737 exponents from the list that are available that still does not have a successful double check:
[URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/available.html"]available.html[/URL]

and there are 304 exponents currently assigned:
[URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/assigned.html"]assigned.html[/URL]

and there are 1943 exponents we have successfully double checked. That is very nice to see:
[URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/verified.html"]verified.html[/URL][/QUOTE]

In the 1st of your lists you see a lot of exponents that does not have been checked once since they were mentioned in this thread. So I think these ones are still on the original "strategic double check" todo. For example these ones:
50010461
50013547
50035823
50071361
50134391
50183843
50214071
50231387
50251009
50368427
50436173
50440301
50454631
50478761
50484293
50495573
50501257
50522753
50532067
50616283

The lists I generate tend to vary here and there as more data gets collected from the machines in question. A machine which seemed "iffy" at first may prove to be a little better than expected and don't get included again next time I check.

The really easy pickings were handled early on so over time I've lowered the threshold for what I consider to be "likely bad", and I also run queries over different time periods (how well did that CPU do month-by-month, or annually, or for "all time"?)

Occasionally I'll throw in some where there's just one or two exponents left to check for a machine that merely had more-bad-than-good so we may as well check the few they had left because we're not getting any more useful predictive data anyway.

Well, with all that said, here's a new list... it's a mix of all the different criteria I mentioned above. :smile:

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39110789 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=39110789,71,1
39600287 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=39600287,71,1
39840851 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=39840851,71,1
39923197 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=39923197,71,1
39998071 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=39998071,71,1
39999763 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=39999763,71,1
40059067 3 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=40059067,72,1
40090997 2 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=40090997,72,1
40094797 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=40094797,72,1
40094909 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=40094909,72,1
40154327 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=40154327,72,1
40282651 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=40282651,72,1
40357469 2 0 5 0 4 1 DoubleCheck=40357469,72,1
40455187 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40455187,72,1
40682749 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40682749,72,1
40693207 2 0 5 0 4 1 DoubleCheck=40693207,72,1
40924393 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=40924393,72,1
40967081 2 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=40967081,72,1
41000893 3 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41000893,72,1
41011319 3 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41011319,72,1
41091527 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41091527,72,1
41115257 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41115257,72,1
41401181 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41401181,72,1
41449861 2 0 5 0 4 1 DoubleCheck=41449861,72,1
41486197 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41486197,72,1
41585671 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41585671,72,1
41591327 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=41591327,72,1
41730151 2 0 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=41730151,72,1
42220699 4 0 1 3 1 3 DoubleCheck=42220699,72,1
42265469 2 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=42265469,72,1
42295639 2 0 8 0 8 0 DoubleCheck=42295639,72,1
42341239 2 0 8 0 8 0 DoubleCheck=42341239,72,1
42430721 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42430721,72,1
42693701 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=42693701,72,1
43060453 2 0 5 0 4 1 DoubleCheck=43060453,72,1
43347061 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=43347061,72,1
45531323 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=45531323,72,1
45902009 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=45902009,72,1
46683467 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=46683467,72,1
46686749 2 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=46686749,72,1
46785359 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=46785359,72,1
47017771 2 0 8 0 8 0 DoubleCheck=47017771,72,1
47869397 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=47869397,72,1
49435933 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=49435933,72,1
50152231 2 0 2 1 2 1 DoubleCheck=50152231,73,1
51728737 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=51728737,73,1
52046131 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=52046131,73,1
52591499 2 0 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=52591499,73,1
56874541 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=56874541,73,1
65789629 3 1 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=65789629,74,1
65789653 3 1 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=65789653,74,1
67173527 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=67173527,74,1
67728877 3 1 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=67728877,74,1
67852633 3 1 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=67852633,74,1
67852639 3 1 5 0 5 0 DoubleCheck=67852639,74,1
70541467 8 0 2 3 3 2 DoubleCheck=70541467,75,1
70615357 8 0 2 3 3 2 DoubleCheck=70615357,75,1
71992741 2 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=71992741,75,1
72850889 4 0 1 2 2 1 DoubleCheck=72850889,75,1
73115041 8 0 2 3 3 2 DoubleCheck=73115041,75,1
73138057 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=73138057,75,1
74683481 2 0 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=74683481,75,1
75256669 3 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75256669,75,1
75818773 2 0 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=75818773,75,1
76193773 2 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=76193773,75,1
77888123 2 0 2 0 2 0 DoubleCheck=77888123,75,1
78401023 25 6 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=78401023,75,1
78931819 25 6 3 0 3 0 DoubleCheck=78931819,75,1
[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;439636]
Well, with all that said, here's a new list... it's a mix of all the different criteria I mentioned above. :smile:[/QUOTE]

I took the ones below 42M.

Took the 42-43M ones, namely:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;439636]

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
42220699 4 0 1 3 1 3 DoubleCheck=42220699,72,1
42265469 2 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=42265469,72,1
42295639 2 0 8 0 8 0 DoubleCheck=42295639,72,1
42341239 2 0 8 0 8 0 DoubleCheck=42341239,72,1
42430721 3 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=42430721,72,1
42693701 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=42693701,72,1
43060453 2 0 5 0 4 1 DoubleCheck=43060453,72,1
43347061 2 0 4 0 4 0 DoubleCheck=43347061,72,1
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

One of Curtis Cooper's results is bad, though it is 7 years old so that machine probably don't exist anymore: [URL="http://mersenne.org/M41425513"]http://mersenne.org/M41425513[/URL]

It just made me wonder if any of his current machines have mostly bad results? and if yes do you report it to him?

[QUOTE=ATH;439745]One of Curtis Cooper's results is bad, though it is 7 years old so that machine probably don't exist anymore: [URL="http://mersenne.org/M41425513"]http://mersenne.org/M41425513[/URL]

It just made me wonder if any of his current machines have mostly bad results? and if yes do you report it to him?[/QUOTE]

I wonder if mersenne server would send an email in this case?

Nowadays we have this setting on the "CPU page":
"Send an email if computer returns a suspicious LL result"
Would be nice that we also get this email if someone else proves later that our first check was bad.

[QUOTE=ATH;439745]One of Curtis Cooper's results is bad, though it is 7 years old so that machine probably don't exist anymore: [URL="http://mersenne.org/M41425513"]http://mersenne.org/M41425513[/URL]
[/QUOTE]

Dozens if not hundreds of Curtis Cooper's results are bad, or suspected bad. I think he's just using whatever machines are available on campus and inevitably some of them turn out to be bad, given the sheer volume of his production.

Here are some verified bad, there are many more mismatches pending triple checks:

[URL="http://mersenne.org/M36850763"]36850763[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M38577367"]38577367[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M39006397"]39006397[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M39553141"]39553141[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M39637811"]39637811[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M39933337"]39933337[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M40325119"]40325119[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M40405793"]40405793[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M40538203"]40538203[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M40575707"]40575707[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M40673887"]40673887[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M40775263"]40775263[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M41144893"]41144893[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M41299637"]41299637[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M42240043"]42240043[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M43681081"]43681081[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M45921637"]45921637[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M46328993"]46328993[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M47492827"]47492827[/URL]
[URL="http://mersenne.org/M49510871"]49510871[/URL]

I just confirmed [url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=77900497]M77900497[/url]. The initial result was turned in way back in 2003.

It took me less than six days. I can only imagine how many months it took the initial user.

All done.

[COLOR="Red"]Red is mismatch[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Blue"]Blue is a mismatch, already triple checked and verified[/COLOR]


[QUOTE=endless mike;439016]From the list, I've claimed some from the top and a few from the bottom

[CODE]exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo
39652001 9 10 1 3 1 3 DoubleCheck=39652001,71,1
40035407 2 2 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=40035407,72,1
40058047 15 8 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40058047,72,1
40140053 26 20 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40140053,72,1
40156199 21 17 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40156199,72,1
[COLOR="Red"]40340723 2 2 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=40340723,72,1[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Red"]40437613 2 2 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=40437613,72,1[/COLOR]
40580131 1 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=40580131,72,1
40606603 11 8 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40606603,72,1
40630201 38 22 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40630201,72,1
[COLOR="Red"]40692689 3 2 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40692689,72,1[/COLOR]
40788833 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40788833,72,1
40878647 1 0 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40878647,72,1
40938013 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=40938013,72,1
[COLOR="Blue"]41228987 5 4 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=41228987,72,1[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Red"]41236483 6 2 1 4 1 4 DoubleCheck=41236483,72,1[/COLOR]

[COLOR="Red"]75620593 2 1 1 0 1 0 DoubleCheck=75620593,75,1[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Red"]75737747 3 0 1 1 1 1 DoubleCheck=75737747,75,1[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Red"]76937989 0 0 0 1 1 0 DoubleCheck=76937989,75,1[/COLOR][/CODE][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;439772]I just confirmed [url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=77900497]M77900497[/url]. The initial result was turned in way back in 2003.[/QUOTE]

From the datamines:

[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=77900461&exp_hi=&full=1"]M77900461[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=77909869&exp_hi=&full=1"]M77909869[/URL]
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=77909939&exp_hi=&full=1"]M77909939[/URL]

Thirteen year old unfinished business:

[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=1447[/url]
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=1203[/url]

Stay tuned...