GIMPS wont process my manual work
 

I have run LL tests on a few numbers now and have submitted them but they say that they are already in the database also the work i submit inst showing up under my completed tab

[QUOTE=kenny3;403126]I have run LL tests on a few numbers now and have submitted them but they say that they are already in the database also the work i submit inst showing up under my completed tab[/QUOTE]

Did you log in before uploading the result?

What are the exponents? Don't give us your results, just the assignments you took, and we might be able to see something.

[QUOTE=kenny3;403126]I have run LL tests on a few numbers now and have submitted them but they say that they are already in the database also the work i submit inst showing up under my completed tab[/QUOTE]

By default the results are automatically sent as soon as they complete....as long as you have set up a user on your client side and checked the box to let PrimeNet Get/Report results ... under "Test..." // "Primenet..."

[QUOTE=petrw1;403140]By default the results are automatically sent as soon as they complete....as long as you have set up a user on your client side and checked the box to let PrimeNet Get/Report results ... under "Test..." // "Primenet..."[/QUOTE]

Thread title says he got the assignments manually.

I was logged in when I uploaded them and I have just tried uploading them again and got exactly the same result, one thing I did notice is that it said no time stamps where found in the results but I have no idea weather or not that would change the results and also if it helps I was using CUDALucas to check these numbers, I can upload a picture of what It says if you need me to.

[QUOTE=Dubslow;403142]Thread title says he got the assignments manually.[/QUOTE]Doesn't matter how you got them. As long as "Do not connect..." is unchecked, the results will be sent in automatically.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;403158]Doesn't matter how you got them. As long as "Do not connect..." is unchecked, the results will be sent in automatically.[/QUOTE]

Who says he's using Prime95?

Unfortunately OP needs to post a lot more in the way of details before we can do more besides speculate about the most likely issues.

This is what it looks like after I uploaded the results, but still under my results tab none of this is showing up. [url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=12667&stc=1&d=1432856149[/url] *Edit* sorry i messed up the first link this is the proper one

[QUOTE=kenny3;403161]This is what it looks like after I uploaded the results, but still under my results tab none of this is showing up. [url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=12667&stc=1&d=1432856149[/url] *Edit* sorry i messed up the first link this is the proper one[/QUOTE]You are reporting 4 new primes very close together? :ermm:
The system is designed to treat all reports of new primes differently.

Sit back and wait. Some one will contact you shortly, if they think it might be real.

Ah, you are the one who reported 6 new Mersenne primes this morning. Alas, not very likely.

Did you build this CudaLucas version yourself? If so, something has gone wrong. If not, maybe there is some kind of nvidia driver issue. Try asking for help in the GPU computing forum to track down the problem. Also, CudaLucas has some self-test options you should run.

[QUOTE=Prime95;403167]Ah, you are the one who reported 6 new Mersenne primes this morning. Alas, not very likely.[/QUOTE]

Maybe he's from the future and they're the last six??! :)

I did not build this version my self I downloaded it from source forge as for self checking I'm not sure how to do that.

ok there is differently a problem with cudalucas as I just tried and double checked a number and it reported it as prime