[QUOTE=sdbardwick;407394]We'll need to wait for Mark for it to be official, but it looks like your result is good! My boring Haswell-E produced a zero-error result that matches your residue (at least as far as I can tell).[/QUOTE]

I should have an answer tomorrow morning. ETA is 15 hours, but I'll likely be sleeping. As it's already assigned, and I don't want to poach, I'll only submit the result if it differs from all the others.

[QUOTE=sdbardwick;407394]We'll need to wait for Mark for it to be official, but it looks like your result is good! My boring Haswell-E produced a zero-error result that matches your residue (at least as far as I can tell).[/QUOTE]
That is a huge relief to hear and a nice reduction in my worry - thanks for the effort!

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;407407]I should have an answer tomorrow morning. ETA is 15 hours, but I'll likely be sleeping. As it's already assigned, and I don't want to poach, I'll only submit the result if it differs from all the others.[/QUOTE]
No worries, I can hopefully wait until the 3rd of September!

[QUOTE=CuriousKit;407375]Oh man... [I]three[/I] results that don't agree?! Now I have no clue what to think![/QUOTE]

If there are exponents with 3+ unmatched results, I usually pick those up pretty quick once they're unassigned.

I don't touch assigned exponents though... there's enough work with triple+ checking that I don't have to worry about picking up any that someone might be working on. :smile:

I just added a batch of, I think, 6 exponents that need quad checks and weren't assigned. Some had a new mismatch, some recently became available.

Overall there aren't many with 3+ mismatches left... I've cleared out all of them I could and now just picking off the few that become available.

In rare cases my own result doesn't match any of the others, so I've been mentioning my mismatched *fourth* result to the Marin Mersennearies thread so someone can do a quint check. I have a handful where my check was the third mismatch and it now needs a quad check, but I haven't been pointing those out... probably a dozen or so of them. And quite a few of mine now need triple checks thanks to the "strategic double checking" we've been doing... picking up lots of (probably) bad first time tests. :smile:

Hello,

Sorry if posting this to a wrong thread.
I've recently got a "C-Unverified" result which is still unassigned (for a month now).
Could someone please triple-check it?
[url]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=35728993&full=1[/url]

Thanks a lot.
Andrey.

Just tried picking it up as a manual test, but it won't let me. Says it's unavailable. How is this normally done?

[QUOTE=sdbardwick;407343]Finished with zero errors, but without matching other results. It would be great if someone else picked it up for a quick re-test, but I'll schedule it for a rerun it on a known-good Sandy Bridge box after endless mike's finishes. So in a week we'll (probably) know either way.[/QUOTE]

[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=39070231&full=1]M39070231[/url] is not prime. Res64: D5FE1583820D4C__.

I matched CuriousKit's result.

[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36666709&full=1"]M36666709[/URL] Hmm.. I'm really curious about this one as it was done on a GPU.

[QUOTE=kracker;407622][URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36666709&full=1"]M36666709[/URL] Hmm.. I'm really curious about this one as it was done on a GPU.[/QUOTE]

I tried to grab it, but someone did in the literal last 30 seconds.

[QUOTE=kracker;407622][URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36666709&full=1"]M36666709[/URL] Hmm.. I'm really curious about this one as it was done on a GPU.[/QUOTE]I grabbed this one so we'll know in about a day.
Edit: Sorry Mark :)

[QUOTE=sdbardwick;407626]I grabbed this one so we'll know in about a day.
Edit: Sorry Mark :)[/QUOTE]

Thanks! :smile:

[QUOTE=kracker;407622][URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36666709&full=1"]M36666709[/URL] Hmm.. I'm really curious about this one as it was done on a GPU.[/QUOTE]We match!