I'm on vacation next week; I'm pushing another dozen numbers to the 14e queue (eight homcun + four of Wellman's from [url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=438021&postcount=634[/url] )

If anyone's got two or three suggestions for 15e I'm all ears.

Tom, can I request if you can add more than a dozen. NFS@Home is processing more than 15k 14e tasks daily. Have all my cores sieving for 14e.
Thank you and enjoy your break.

[QUOTE=fivemack;438888]

If anyone's got two or three suggestions for 15e I'm all ears.[/QUOTE]

Can I suggest C186 from 842592:i8053 ? It resists a lot of ECM curves.

[QUOTE=unconnected;438891]Can I suggest C186 from 842592:i8053 ? It resists a lot of ECM curves.[/QUOTE]

Have you got a polynomial? I don't have enough total compute to produce one worth throwing at nfs@home inside 36 hours, let alone enough spare compute, but I will happily queue it up if you provide a polynomial.

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;438889]Tom, can I request if you can add more than a dozen. NFS@Home is processing more than 15k 14e tasks daily. Have all my cores sieving for 14e.
Thank you and enjoy your break.[/QUOTE]

The homogeneous-Cunningham alone is 1200MQ, which (if I've got the block size right) I think is 300k blocks so enough for three weeks. Plus 760MQ from the XYYXF side; I will need to top up towards the end of August but not before.

[QUOTE=fivemack;438893]The homogeneous-Cunningham alone is 1200MQ, which (if I've got the block size right) I think is 300k blocks so enough for three weeks. Plus 760MQ from the XYYXF side; I will need to top up towards the end of August but not before.[/QUOTE]

Ok, thank you.

[QUOTE=fivemack;438893] I will need to top up towards the end of August but not before.[/QUOTE]

Looks like someone needs to top up (if this means push the current 14e numbers to 100%) otherwise the server will dry within 1.5 days.

During week ''Syracuse University'' is daily processing by itself 13k 14e tasks....:bow:

Carlos

Per Carlos's request, here's version 3 of list of polynomials and parameters for the remaining Homogeneous Cunningham numbers that are ready for sieving. There are 33 composites in the file.

In response to a request from Carlos, please find below an updated list of [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=438021&postcount=634]remaining unqueued composites from my original list[/url]. Polys attached.


Remaining xyyx composites from original list

C216_148_124
C202_123_83
C226_129_68
C211_137_53
C211_148_116
C207_148_112
C205_134_96
C177_124_81


New additional list of xyyx composites. Note last three best sieved on algebraic side.
C220_121_96
C231_132_67
C192_131_66
C223_130_67
C183_132_122
C188_122_91
C184_129_70
C182_133_62 - use -a side
C195_132_118 - use -a side
C228_136_98 - use -a side

C181_133_103 for 15e
 

Can C181_133_103 be added to the 15e queue? [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=439893&postcount=681]Dubslow found a good ploy[/url]. Thank you.

[b]fivemack[/b]: test sieving tonight, will add tomorrow morning

C178_133_71 had been queued without a skew value set (the polynomial-selection method used puts the skew in the information line at the bottom, rather than as a skew: line for the siever), so jobs were all failing. Deleted and re-queued as C178_133_71b, but it's now at the back of the line.

C181_133_103 queued.

The merit of test sieving is at least in part to ensure that the polynomial you paste into the box on the Web page is one that you have just confirmed the siever can sieve ...

(also, remember the lss: 0 line for GNFS jobs, they're much slower if you sieve on the wrong side ... I have just had to edit two jobs because I forgot that)