[B]QUEUED AS 12p7_236[/B]

SNFS-254.69 C198 HCN (12+7,236), ECM to t56+. For 14e.
[code]
n: 372537260834831926040622429634162528573739068630804420953767455026327718084389104020866794496716945976872249176644116632880381673773193337449327860697746455687141565247508799660278209860632446988457
# 12^236+7^236, difficulty: 254.69, skewness: 0.84, alpha: 0.00
skew: 0.836
c6: 144
c0: 49
Y1: -909543680129861140820205019889143
Y0: 1224809639974238708818962962512535510581248
rlim: 268000000
alim: 268000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6
[/code]
Trial sieving 2K blocks.
[code]
Q Yield
--- -----
20M 4675
60M 3771
100M 3612
140M 3077
180M 2490
220M 2842
260M 2919
300M 2605
[/code]
Recommend sieving special Q on rational side, 20M - 310M.

[B]QUEUED AS 783__211_5m1[/B]

C173 from the OPN t800 file.
[ a.k.a. Phi_5(Phi_3(Phi_3(Phi_5(Phi_13(31)/42407/7908881)/31/264581/1080091))/3)/5/41/61/309121/p18 ]
P50^5-1
[CODE]n: 87307784153956753170870217440784786416425367708403799451511107219828670778286464676612884737113746093756359402943183559114521734914391930363920070382408667056021591471809481
# 78319330468586955949650403084281852778744337265211^5-1, difficulty: 199.58, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.45
# cost: 1.35979e+17, est. time: 64.75 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 1.000
c4: 1
c3: 1
c2: 1
c1: 1
c0: 1
Y1: -1
Y0: 78319330468586955949650403084281852778744337265211
type: snfs
rlim: 16700000
alim: 16700000
lpbr: 29
lpba: 29
mfbr: 85
mfba: 58
rlambda: 3.5
alambda: 2.5[/CODE]
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
[CODE] Q Yield
[B]6M[/B] 8933
10M 10882
20M 11657
30M 10801
36M 10074[/CODE]

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;535712]This C160 might make a nice benchmark dataset (per my side-chat with xyzzy). Could you please post matrix size as soon as you have it? If it's 6-7M, I think Mike (and I) may grab the dataset.[/QUOTE]
Matrix size is only 4.6M at density=130.
If you interesting, I have another C162 for queue, it might gave matrix of appropriate size.

Let's use it; that's big enough to give a useful measure of multi-threaded speed, and at 30LP small enough for the dataset to be reasonable to download.

If the nfs@home folks could put off deleting this job for a week or so, I'd like to download the dataset; ideally that'll give xyzzy time to do the same.

I say this because a C162 should, in my experience, be solidly into 31LP size; seems I simply forgot what matrix size one should expect from a 30LP job.

We will arrange to have this job put into our shared Dropbox folder.

:mike:

[B]QUEUED AS 12p5_236[/B]

SNFS-255.29 C235 HCN (12+5,236), ECM to t56+. For 14e.
[code]
n: 2117838480846978573020158580848740161668061656741588703897845311444287155275153881477129191294971496283853024531148064123198830786639923802211614917225611730989033720312632634767542930661835972553882798737193556742594008582956754216849
# 12^236+5^236, difficulty: 255.29, skewness: 1.49, alpha: 0.00
skew: 1.494
c6: 9
c0: 100
Y1: -1818989403545856475830078125
Y0: 2449619279948477417637925925025071021162496
rlim: 268000000
alim: 268000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6
[/code]
Trial sieving 2K blocks.
[code]
Q Yield
--- -----
20M 5042
60M 4148
100M 3977
140M 3315
180M 3036
220M 3192
260M 3344
300M 2921
[/code]
Recommend sieving special Q on rational side, 20M - 280M.

[QUOTE=Xyzzy;536178]We will arrange to have this job put into our shared Dropbox folder.

:mike:[/QUOTE]

I've downloaded my copy, and got the matrix to build at TD134 (4569240 cycles / dimensions). Sometime this week I'll start a new thread in msieve forum with comparisons of different msieve versions I have lying around (e.g. VBITS use), various target densities, CPU arch's, etc.

What’s the number tag so I can download it from the server, TIA.

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;536238]What’s the number tag so I can download it from the server, TIA.[/QUOTE]

C160_159978_10356_2

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;536246]C160_159978_10356_2[/QUOTE]

Thank you. Backup on my side.

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;536208]I've downloaded my copy, and got the matrix to build at TD134 (4569240 cycles / dimensions). Sometime this week I'll start a new thread in msieve forum with comparisons of different msieve versions I have lying around (e.g. VBITS use), various target densities, CPU arch's, etc.[/QUOTE]We have our copy downloaded, processed and compressed. It will take a few days to upload it to Dropbox.

[C]-rwxrwxrwx 1 m m 5444893112 Jan 30 14:16 benchmark.tar.gz[/C]

:mike: