[QUOTE=VictordeHolland;409113]Can we download relations or will that impact server performance (bandwidth) too much with the challenge going on??[/QUOTE]
It shouldn't be a problem.

115!+1 queued up after a couple of weeks of GPU polynomial search.

A C188 from the Euclid-Mullin tree has been running for ten days on my GPU, I should have something in a week or so.

I'd like to reserve 3 SNFS difficulty 24x Homogeneous Cunningham numbers for 14e:
11^236+4^236
8^271-5^271
12^227-11^227

But before reserving them in the interface, who can run ECM curves to, say, t55 on them ? :smile:

[QUOTE=debrouxl;409455]I'd like to reserve 3 SNFS difficulty 24x Homogeneous Cunningham numbers for 14e:
11^236+4^236
8^271-5^271
12^227-11^227

But before reserving them in the interface, who can run ECM curves to, say, t55 on them ? :smile:[/QUOTE]

I can run some ECM starting next week, but it'll take a while if I do it all myself, so assistance from others would be great.

4 untapped numbers remaining in the 14e queue, three SNFS difficulty 24x and one SNFS difficulty 231. ~20K WUs left, but the ranges undoubtedly will be expanded.

Never seen so many 14e integers ready to post-process. Challenge was a success, I still see a bunch of crunchers running for milestones and badges for the 14e and 15e applications.

I've reserved and queued 4 near-repdigit fillers, 29-bit LPs tasks of difficulty 219-223.

Sean, did your ECM workers sift through the couple remaining XYYXF SNFS difficulty 24x tasks ?

I have started 100 curves at B1=26e7 on the composite cofactor of 11^236+4^236, on a single ECM process. For the next batch, I should use multiple processes, limited to stage 1, saving residues to their respective files, then concatenate all savefiles and run stage 2 on a single process.

[QUOTE=debrouxl;409699]

Sean, did your ECM workers sift through the couple remaining XYYXF SNFS difficulty 24x tasks ?

[/QUOTE]

No, my workers are still running ECM to t55 on both. Will be 1-2 weeks before they are completed.

Alright.

The 4 near-repdigit 29-bit LPs fillers are pretty easy, so we'll probably need new numbers for 14e by tomorrow evening. Even a couple 31-bit LPs GCW tasks would buy us several days.

[QUOTE=debrouxl;409817]Alright.

The 4 near-repdigit 29-bit LPs fillers are pretty easy, so we'll probably need new numbers for 14e by tomorrow evening. Even a couple 31-bit LPs GCW tasks would buy us several days.[/QUOTE]I'll see what I can do.

I can undoubtedly add some but of the 15 possibilities remaining after I added the last batch, two have already been factored by Rob Hooft as part of the t55 test. If you're prepared to take the risk, I could add some of the others.

Let me know.

Paul

Dmitry (unconnected) has proposed a couple Aliquot numbers, I'll queue them.

I suppose I could take one of the numbers from the batch, we'll see this evening (European time).

I'll update all entries for recent GCW numbers to mention " (ECM to t55 by Rob Hooft)".