![]() |
15e Candidate
[B]QUEUED AS 5039_73m1[/B]
C267 from the MWRB file with OPN weight of 81689 for the 15e queue. [CODE]n: 370578310340182650925597894096489492405238154392626587142699411352335326934686506745300578287661225117594768514219268811410645016482255916982419635809249253655096305319894937453168256773675988388453614757304530138800919307508286254422205328431242271129848806373092161 # 5039^73-1, difficulty: 270.27, skewness: 0.24, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 3.76611e+19, est. time: 17933.84 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 0.242 c6: 5039 c0: -1 Y1: -1 Y0: 267998461123333843822313649147610645572765121 type: snfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 94 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 3.8[/CODE] Trial sieving 5K blocks. [CODE] Q Yield 30M 10448 60M 9656 100M 9619 150M 8294 250M 6956 350M 6461[/CODE] |
[B]QUEUED AS C216_858xx343_5m1[/B]
C216 from the MWRB file with OPN weight of 1346. P54^5-1 [CODE]n: 543395488430202013023992178680553448927060329330013130821938932173903255312757315391758634905078885319803332677235378950895288741125449565712778242190728813603053898620689977188481489946669202736186451797218419504801 # 858576519383732875273928972042726910726848754157383343^5-1, difficulty: 215.74, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.45 # cost: 5.40169e+17, est. time: 257.22 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 1.000 c4: 1 c3: 1 c2: 1 c1: 1 c0: 1 Y1: -1 Y0: 858576519383732875273928972042726910726848754157383343 type: snfs rlim: 67000000 alim: 67000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 91 mfba: 62 rlambda: 3.6 alambda: 2.6[/CODE] Trial sieving 5K blocks. [CODE] Q Yield 20M 11505 60M 12759 100M 12854 140M 11085[/CODE] |
[B]QUEUED AS 775940419_23m1[/B]
C196 from the MWRB file with OPN weight of 2443. [ a.k.a. Phi_23(Phi_3(48247)/3) ] [CODE]n: 3768983625608574429534299430947038876830230197943933331518839964260516475155505997600562256731608796799440706073579429166829527818341441471384674797755933258061578554757208913091431257382924999781 # 775940419^23-1, difficulty: 213.36, skewness: 30.31, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 4.42644e+17, est. time: 210.78 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 30.314 c6: 1 c0: -775940419 Y1: -1 Y0: 362504581718728329005862997143504721 type: snfs rlim: 33500000 alim: 67000000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6[/CODE] Trial sieving 5K blocks. Note: Request starting Q0 @ 16M. [CODE] Q Yield 16M 9530 20M 9599 50M 6509 80M 5071 100M 5016[/CODE] |
[B]QUEUED AS 7_355m2_355[/B]
GNFS C158 HCN (7-2,355), ECM to t55. For 14e. [code] n: 22795329870195321077005339925744314618878566620985708492968838828506288868054836245600917748359472427226420903385921010946757167524879676122623873696521069071 # norm 3.073931e-15 alpha -7.759592 e 1.965e-12 rroots 3 skew: 84683252.00 c0: 356324462563708319026779851750425012404975 c1: 2708627872251538132668667055364341 c2: -236695388794833028236083479 c3: -3835247591175182113 c4: -51781310376 c5: 252 Y0: -9801421806425102632274250332258 Y1: 6297749407119391 rlim: 31800000 alim: 31800000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 [/code] Trial sieving 1K blocks: [code] Q Yield --- ----- 20M 2820 40M 2845 60M 2423 80M 1766 [/code] Recommend giving special Q on algebraic side from 20M-70M. |
[B]QUEUED AS 6_329m5_329[/B]
SNFS C211 HCN (6-5,329), ECM to t55. For 14e. [code] n: 5168200893114141969465095616636432429245875665495327446331254537551796047858530632154044658120598182559056554659626215712111121421046862252493957028810639556400398475494460398909582166511550167521425617620341547 # 6^329-5^329, difficulty: 219.44, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 2.24 skew: 1.000 c6: 1 c5: 1 c4: 1 c3: 1 c2: 1 c1: 1 c0: 1 Y1: -710542735760100185871124267578125 Y0: 3742042951225759540014535187298779136 rlim: 31800000 alim: 31800000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 [/code] Trial sieving 5K blocks: [code] Q Yield --- ----- 20M 15928 40M 12783 60M 10184 80M 8769 [/code] Recommend sieving special Q on rational side from 20M-80M. |
[B]QUEUED AS 6_329plus5_329[/B]
SNFS C199 HCN (6+5,329), ECM to t55. For 14e. [code] n: 4037339532887506735908702439291406936571798410030472876032766267298286050230442511494810292214940471410113301707607466855907616918284727718397630015056345870461052802135113632880374005109272724139147 # 6^329+5^329, difficulty: 219.44, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 2.24 skew: 1.000 c6: 1 c5: -1 c4: 1 c3: -1 c2: 1 c1: -1 c0: 1 Y1: -710542735760100185871124267578125 Y0: 3742042951225759540014535187298779136 rlim: 31800000 alim: 31800000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 [/code] Trial sieving 5K blocks: [code] Q Yield --- ----- 20M 15960 40M 12809 60M 10224 80M 8634 [/code] Recommend sieving special Q on rational side from 20M-80M. |
[B]QUEUED AS 39619_47m1[/B]
C212 from the MWRB file with OPN weight of 3193. [CODE]n: 31883970749628747827314743378813682679804702869730452614329545818724779236589480090230576844363990928298294483569073821990679883896136255577533496381293331520163303806520660058599672988727149130675904480579132341 # 39619^47-1, difficulty: 220.70, skewness: 5.84, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 8.14963e+17, est. time: 388.08 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 5.839 c6: 1 c0: -39619 Y1: -1 Y0: 6070550503500811635081460618505358241 type: snfs rlim: 16700000 alim: 33500000 lpbr: 29 lpba: 29 mfbr: 58 mfba: 85 rlambda: 2.5 alambda: 3.5[/CODE] Trial sieving 5K blocks. Note: Request starting Q0 @ 12M. [CODE] Q Yield 12M 9949 20M 8849 40M 6916 60M 5424[/CODE] |
May I have 10MQ added to 13_2_867m1? Up to 315M last Q.
Either my estimates were off, or the server belch lost a few relations. 610M on 861 is not enough for density 120, so I'm aiming for 620-625M on 867. swellman: Done. |
[QUOTE=jyb;499171][B]QUEUED AS 7_355m2_355[/B]
GNFS C158 HCN (7-2,355), ECM to t55. For 14e. [code] n: 22795329870195321077005339925744314618878566620985708492968838828506288868054836245600917748359472427226420903385921010946757167524879676122623873696521069071 # norm 3.073931e-15 alpha -7.759592 e 1.965e-12 rroots 3 skew: 84683252.00 c0: 356324462563708319026779851750425012404975 c1: 2708627872251538132668667055364341 c2: -236695388794833028236083479 c3: -3835247591175182113 c4: -51781310376 c5: 252 Y0: -9801421806425102632274250332258 Y1: 6297749407119391 rlim: 31800000 alim: 31800000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 [/code] Trial sieving 1K blocks: [code] Q Yield --- ----- 20M 2820 40M 2845 60M 2423 80M 1766 [/code] Recommend giving special Q on algebraic side from 20M-70M.[/QUOTE] Did you really intend the values for r/alim to be 31.8M? Historically these should considerably higher on a 30-bit job. |
Yeah, we often used 60M, or 2^26-1, for these jobs.
|
[QUOTE=swellman;499212]Did you really intend the values for r/alim to be 31.8M? Historically these should considerably higher on a 30-bit job.[/QUOTE]
Perhaps so. I didn't do this out of any particular planning, it was just ignorance. I had initially looked at making these 29-bit jobs. When I changed them to 30-bit I didn't change those limits. However, my test sieving suggests that these jobs should complete quickly and without any problems. Is that a fair statement? And just for my edification, if the limits had been set to more common (i.e. larger) values for 30-bit jobs, would the following statements be correct? 1) For a given range of spec-Q, sieving would give a higher yield. 2) For a given range of spec-Q, sieving would take a little bit more time. 3) Post-processing would take longer. I assume that the gains from #1 would outweigh the losses from #2, so over all sieving would be faster. OTOH, with a small job like this perhaps it's worth slightly longer sieving if it means shorter post-processing. Thoughts? |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.