![]() |
[b]QUEUED[/b] C232_146_49 is ready for SNFS on 14e.
[code] n: 1013101528926077978679178427704027695375716974314089721050828820271712465075225788768410285923554921116684180703005038969476384074972513279143913652849762612925082241419943363578919924527774569025441804427639587057809167118875794133 # 146^49+49^146, difficulty: 250.15, anorm: 1.69e+038, rnorm: 1.23e+047 # scaled difficulty: 251.63, suggest sieving rational side # size = 1.687e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.774e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 250 skew: 4.3896 c6: 1 c0: 7154 Y1: -206453783524884736 Y0: 256923577521058878088611477224235621321607 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 4K: [code] Q=20M 6076 Q=80M 4298 Q=150M 3734 Q=250M 3128 Q=300M 2974 [/code] Suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-270M with target # rels = 250M. |
[b]QUEUED[/b] C197 from the OPN t1200 file.
P55.21900_5M.C197 [CODE]n: 28848967990077705846988961468539295920671331242155757837897308053389516744137239692990930018313384178496879018740961164234293984375975760512498647138632711308817604574356514611333530865932937557161 # 2190066216160043027357373834534068629814437632915752857^5-1, difficulty: 217.36, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.45 # cost: 6.1848e+17, est. time: 294.51 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 1.000 c4: 1 c3: 1 c2: 1 c1: 1 c0: 1 Y1: -1 Y0: 2190066216160043027357373834534068629814437632915752857 type: snfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 92 mfba: 62 rlambda: 3.6 alambda: 2.6[/CODE] Trial sieving 5K blocks. [CODE] Q Yield 20M 10345 60M 11861 100M 12221 140M 11148[/CODE] This will be it for a while since I will be out of town next week. |
[b]QUEUED[/b] C233_133_86 is ready for SNFS on 14e.
[code] n: 10633354020919847828049263705668353382285616309669021200078310598696796477207436371326306802388614964256350490347978458835867676327562757887165210981714336194048764404430848960645565061266895540038717130441903406926921630132396259373 # 133^86+86^133, difficulty: 259.22, anorm: 2.47e+039, rnorm: 2.32e+048 # scaled difficulty: 260.72, suggest sieving rational side # size = 6.137e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 8.413e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 259 skew: 2.4296 c6: 86 c0: 17689 Y1: -541904769658563069794308330729 Y0: 3622145797004077275761664476965378610692096 rlim: 268000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 5K [code] Q=30M 9513 Q=70M 8214 Q=140M 7044 Q=230M 6493 Q=320M 6047 Q=400M 5352 [/code] suggesting a sieving range for Q of 30M-390M with a target # relations = 490M |
[b]QUEUED[/b] XY_C230_130_77 is ready for SNFS on 15e.
[code] n: 18315142786666101398591398195652968891950079559697267218869070977624355302066323827855137263904494058903414979203244755702312169623822646226647486135677880809134691327837076059931140659435555511440691793413686862305600824600423447 # 137^77+77^137, difficulty: 262.22, anorm: 2.05e+038, rnorm: -2.57e+049 # scaled difficulty: 264.07, suggest sieving rational side # size = 3.233e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 5.186e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 262 skew: 1.1008 c6: 77 c0: 137 Y1: -24506804088319785713436649354236658982956133 Y0: 5989180101784270567563310697 rlim: 268000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 5K [code] Q=30M 13535 Q=60M 11612 Q=100M 10688 Q=160M 9560 Q=220M 8185 Q=300M 7481 [/code] suggesting a sieving range for Q of 30M-260M with a target # relations = 460M |
[b]QUEUED[/b] C234_138_130 is ready for SNFS on 14e.
[code] n: 873871377158311959084069104485448955380742878586910511066775683676005627366318727796089678603178221314609623090150332844943898936307004248150490182806133725295221071021681004836291150479521618813536089469216388339331568112155847161029 # 138^130+130^138, difficulty: 251.99, anorm: 2.76e+038, rnorm: -2.25e+048 # scaled difficulty: 253.64, suggest sieving rational side # size = 9.276e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.125e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 251 skew: 5.1676 c6: 1 c0: 19044 Y1: -995490680060699376274247097969055175781250 Y0: 28489183085523666542794945375463469260361 rlim: 268000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 5K [code] Q=20M 11629 Q=70M 9941 Q=130M 9048 Q=200M 8060 Q=280M 7355 [/code] suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-275M with a target # rels = 460M. |
[b]QUEUED[/b] C180_132_95 is the composite cofactor of C235_132_95, which fell out when yoyo@Home found a p56. The C180 is close to the GNFS/SNFS threshold but test sieving shows it to be a decent SNFS candidate on 14e. GNFS would need a VERY good poly to beat SNFS, but when considering the estimated time to run a poly search and then properly test sieve it, SNFS seems to have the edge.
[code] n: 289396665786312982141006307236099419705652823106983094814522618811166859549920672792894184549036158544227111489361203033421179354216009603309439787077402269680722529033925255839017 # 132^95+95^132, difficulty: 262.26, anorm: 4.60e+037, rnorm: -3.44e+049 # scaled difficulty: 264.24, suggest sieving rational side # size = 8.792e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.039e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 262 skew: 1.1282 c6: 16 c0: 33 Y1: -32353354497370936650756292250156402587890625 Y0: 4247690876126830874600666969407488 rlim: 268000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 5K [code] Q=20M 10037 Q=60M 9062 Q=120M 8467 Q=200M 7607 Q=280M 6754 Q=340M 6195 [/code] suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-310M with a target # rels = 460M |
[QUOTE=ATH;479462]So apparently the large vectors makes sense even without MPI=1:
make all WIN=1 WIN64=1 ECM=1 CUDA=0 NO_ZLIB=1 VBITS=64/128/256: [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/msieve-svn1018-vbits64-haswell.zip"]msieve-svn1018-vbits64-haswell.zip[/URL] [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/msieve-svn1018-vbits128-haswell.zip"]msieve-svn1018-vbits128-haswell.zip[/URL] [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/msieve-svn1018-vbits256-haswell.zip"]msieve-svn1018-vbits256-haswell.zip[/URL] [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/msieve-svn1018-vbits64-sandybridge.zip"]msieve-svn1018-vbits64-sandybridge.zip[/URL] [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/msieve-svn1018-vbits128-sandybridge.zip"]msieve-svn1018-vbits128-sandybridge.zip[/URL] [URL="http://hoegge.dk/mersenne/msieve-svn1018-vbits256-sandybridge.zip"]msieve-svn1018-vbits256-sandybridge.zip[/URL][/QUOTE] For filtering stage of a GNFS130 I see a gain of 30% on those new binaries, nothing on the LA stage. Version tested were all sandybridge. |
[b]QUEUED[/b]
[i]also identified as phi_7(largest factor of phi_7(phi_13(7)))[/i] C164 from the OPN t600 file. P38.14020_5M.C164 [CODE]n: 23868414476868587995325249170685588832943809103422768132521828316896025074624706715888406731264933402097870928021784797238895030842545830931640968187921163985020669 # 14020072124657538094183043839811142289^7-1 skew: 1.00 c6: 1 c5: 1 c4: 1 c3: 1 c2: 1 c1: 1 c0: 1 Y1: -1 Y0: 14020072124657538094183043839811142289 m: 14020072124657538094183043839811142289 type: snfs rlim: 67000000 alim: 67000000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6[/CODE] Trial sieving 5K blocks. [CODE] Q Yield 20M 16361 50M 12366 80M 10196[/CODE] |
[b]QUEUED[/b] 13*2^847-1 for 14e queue:
[code]n: 42246880894524383035892167318063256701851446750403840464286176017669351238138572605165092732275908592011242081859470348782066064144827879104751823280198945957929888255355032133967798016490782003 m: 2787593149816327892691964784081045188247552 type: snfs size: 257 skew: 0.60 c6: 26 c0: -1 rlim: 134000000 alim: 200000000 lpbr: 33 lpba: 33 mfbr: 65 mfba: 92 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 3.7[/code] Trial sieving blocks of Q=2000: Q=40M 0.152 sec/rel, 9863 rels Q=100M 0.198 sec/rel, 8329 rels Q=160M 0.204 sec/rel, 7925 rels Suggest Q 15M-165M, for 620M rels. I tested mfbr of 65, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95; 92 was the fastest of the 3LP options, with 20% better yield than 65 at a penalty of 5% speed (at the same Q). Since 92 will find more relations at lower/faster Q, choosing 92 means avoiding the slowest Q and is overall no slower. Also, it's fun to try something new in parameter selection with an eye toward extending 14e use via improved yields. I'll do the LA. |
[QUOTE=RichD;479928][b]QUEUED[/b]
[i]also identified as phi_7(largest factor of phi_7(phi_13(7)))[/i] C164 from the OPN t600 file. P38.14020_5M.C164 [/QUOTE] Under my aforementioned scheme, this would be named [c]OPN_C164_7_13_1_7_6_7_7[/c]. (Perhaps the OPN subscheme should include an extra letter to help discern what each field is, like OPN_C164_7_p13_n1_p7_n6_p7_n7 ? Where p means "phi" or "power" and "n" means "nth factor of previously-calculated number", or maybe something else.) |
[b]QUEUED AS C168_AS3408_1679[/b] C166 from Aliquot Sequence 3408.
AS 3408:i1679 [CODE]n: 1849959698458141896282042340312824214549892860101677080063475429346433861792907412970467950297875110048406275074129147348999744724448993266489199137326482342635948767 skew: 2852369.7 lss: 0 c0: 79263284085565649297873532999343489290 c1: 79084889934473764927625577490723 c2: 44061537669541890460319774 c3: -87634034888970002123 c4: -7574786715264 c5: 265680 Y0: -106938861903569094031722097992052 Y1: 15868117662209966512381 type: gnfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 [/CODE]Trial sieving 5K blocks. [CODE] Q Yield 20M 11645 60M 12907 100M 12124 140M 11712[/CODE] |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.