![]() |
I'm having complains about memory usage for the lasieved and lasievee applications and I do understand why it has increased but I also understand clients side therefore please can someone get in touch with Greg so he can update the NFS@Home preferences from
[CODE]lasieved - app for RSALS subproject, uses less than 0.5 GB memory: no lasievee - work nearly always available, uses up to 0.5 GB memory: no lasievef - used for huge factorizations, uses up to 1 GB memory: no lasieve5f - used for huge factorizations, uses up to 1 GB memory: no[/CODE] to [CODE]lasieved - app for RSALS subproject, uses less than 1 GB memory: no lasievee - work nearly always available, uses up to 1 GB memory: no lasievef - used for huge factorizations, uses up to 2 GB memory: no lasieve5f - used for huge factorizations, uses up to 2 GB memory: no[/CODE] |
[b]QUEUED[/b] C231_143_54 is ready for SNFS on 14e
[code] n: 621085412790375307954842303091242401599187785292720387746556526386679857104333956026343063778911229796200937308543061359094429164695389309646960536529277270574547452218723280530181202814788132166578758240264451449370939414863659139 # 143^54+54^143, difficulty: 249.46, anorm: 1.47e+037, rnorm: 2.71e+047 # scaled difficulty: 251.18, suggest sieving rational side # size = 2.476e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.298e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 249 skew: 1.9442 c6: 1 c0: 54 Y1: -25004854810776297743 Y0: 377963825299746235969115118367001548947456 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 2K [code] Q=20M 3535 Q=80M 2368 Q=150M 2108 Q=250M 1768 [/code] Suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-230M with a target # rels = 240M. |
[b]QUEUED[/b] C220_129_109 is ready for SNFS on 15e
[code] n: 1346957944035369350649177183417460897586124902256063554768391394398599626692189283695087162300401361678902401675388806200833900916005885361521283703010174719944801385811778394608428733146714260436067757229410423908184919 # 127^109+109^127, difficulty: 260.79, anorm: 2.35e+038, rnorm: 6.03e+048 # scaled difficulty: 262.53, suggest sieving rational side # size = 2.279e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 4.128e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 260 skew: 1.0258 c6: 109 c0: 127 Y1: -73869809188743794269800200736680064769 Y0: 6108807736878338211809453421477901879741309 rlim: 268000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 2K [code] Q=20M 4468 Q=80M 3284 Q=150M 2974 Q=250M 2831 Q=300M 2326 [/code] Suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-330M with a target # rels = 480M. |
Pretty sure that 77^128+1 cofactor is somewhat undersieved. Not sure by how much, but I definitely can't get a matrix.
Well, if it's not undersieved, some help would be appreciated, but... I'm not really sure what else it could be [code]nice -n 19 ./msieve -t 4 -v -nc "target_density=70" Msieve v. 1.53 (SVN 991M) Sat Dec 16 06:06:19 2017 random seeds: 91020989 c2601156 factoring 570611637478057074957499986744193359634547269168995406738772319690440015794454188222324761357837625956203568420184748900348100119547789201738170458697904144112540373136615440721108151900897392173128110 898213889 (210 digits) no P-1/P+1/ECM available, skipping commencing number field sieve (210-digit input) R0: 4133378999547948340940571656980377632477 R1: -1 A0: 1 A1: 0 A2: 0 A3: 0 A4: 0 A5: 0 A6: 5929 skew 1.44, size 4.098e-12, alpha 0.309, combined = 3.062e-13 rroots = 0 commencing relation filtering setting target matrix density to 70.0 estimated available RAM is 15992.2 MB commencing duplicate removal, pass 1 read 10M relations read 20M relations read 30M relations read 40M relations read 50M relations read 60M relations read 70M relations error -15 reading relation 76688484 read 80M relations error -11 reading relation 80259748 skipped 17 relations with b > 2^32 found 3505866 hash collisions in 89196982 relations added 1218505 free relations commencing duplicate removal, pass 2 found 0 duplicates and 90415487 unique relations memory use: 261.2 MB reading ideals above 86573056 commencing singleton removal, initial pass memory use: 3012.0 MB reading all ideals from disk memory use: 1657.2 MB commencing in-memory singleton removal begin with 90415487 relations and 118660108 unique ideals reduce to 3625379 relations and 1325112 ideals in 24 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 8 reading ideals above 100000 commencing singleton removal, initial pass memory use: 344.5 MB reading all ideals from disk memory use: 167.4 MB keeping 11247032 ideals with weight <= 200, target excess is 19298 commencing in-memory singleton removal begin with 3858602 relations and 11247032 unique ideals reduce to 801 relations and 0 ideals in 4 passes max relations containing the same ideal: 0 filtering wants 1000000 more relations elapsed time 00:20:28[/code] |
Yes, it's wildly undersieved (I think I started it out planning to adjust the size later, because I wasn't quite confident with my yield measurements locally); have roughly doubled the number of Q.
|
15e
[b]QUEUED[/b] C245_147_55 is ready for SNFS on 15e
[code] n: 15066216921569949537278591303356552160569221987375280410339362242277652815400239026041568122693798988503386855080995849909622265146560854689413460313451823537765927499326782303115354897790334497196042430631665104049382608447803356519497007367877 # 147^55+55^147, difficulty: 261.05, anorm: 9.89e+039, rnorm: 2.36e+048 # scaled difficulty: 262.45, suggest sieving rational side # size = 2.344e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 4.256e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 261 skew: 1.5488 c6: 1331 c0: 18375 Y1: -32052064847671367667 Y0: 2935449086370352236840677559375762939453125 rlim: 268000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 2K [code] Q=20M 5474 Q=80M 3656 Q=150M 3421 Q=250M 3307 Q=300M 3053 [/code] Suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-290M with a target # of rels = 490M. |
Two for 14e
[b]BOTH QUEUED[/b]
C231_145_57 is ready for SNFS on 14e. [code] n: 487462203488641084662765485427390608344534392459053644895041190483745804399470392946074891462927507600003649603068413641219317478019716960363312633057558748313060257478328181865245410500890090974235275206527434105842036615448873389 # 145^57+57^145, difficulty: 254.60, anorm: 2.90e+032, rnorm: 3.08e+056 # scaled difficulty: 258.61, suggest sieving rational side # size = 9.859e-018, alpha = 0.000, combined = 5.051e-014, rroots = 1 type: snfs size: 254 skew: 7.3206 c5: 1 c0: 21025 Y1: -595728015903604931640625 Y0: 832474260857516094176403796072035154334600003844057 rlim: 268000000 alim: 400000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 2K [code] Q=30M 2022 Q=80M 1942 Q=150M 2122 Q=250M 2275 Q=350M 2075 Q=450M 1897 [/code] Suggesting, with a dose of hedging, a sieving range of 20M-490M with a target # rels = 470M. ================================== C231_144_110 is ready for SNFS on 14e [code] n: 700429108582468681530022000698447919307047404004645133500918005306274800591896396190869457916486076120861120153542900423094582708590081167008477678971459432646201578658620098507025288130705511570556065872418878841284188516477070969 # 144^110+110^144, difficulty: 250.61, anorm: 3.60e+037, rnorm: 3.63e+047 # scaled difficulty: 252.28, suggest sieving rational side # size = 2.321e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.189e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 250 skew: 2.6207 c6: 1 c0: 324 Y1: -84495767949234467194240606666752 Y0: 587089817274070447368135511875152587890625 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 [/code] Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 2K [code] Q=20M 3310 Q=80M 2179 Q=150M 1974 Q=250M 1697 [/code] Suggesting a range for Q of 20M-240M with target # rels = 240M. Last of my nominations for a while. Gotta focus on postprocessing. Thanks. |
[b]QUEUED[/b] 13*2^836-1, for 14e:
[code]n: 446778553763041880824029402190312582258057034807820679885780814903984332892787473020745705377923758412764637717930269968958993142983575301680607186388696393538943526067219268231596895913186678728689 m: 696898287454081973172991196020261297061888 type: snfs size: 254 skew: 0.54 c6: 52 c0: -1 rlim: 134000000 alim: 200000000 lpbr: 33 lpba: 33 mfbr: 65 mfba: 65 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7[/code] Suggested sieve range 20M-180M for ~630M relations. Test-sieved on 1.1Ghz ultrabook, 2k Q-ranges: [code]30M 0.117 sec/rel, 9652 rels 70M 0.127 sec/rel, 7953 rels 100M 0.145 sec/rel, 7892 rels 130M 0.164 sec/rel, 7442 rels 160M 0.169 sec/rel, 7059 rels 190M 0.184 sec/rel, 6794 rels[/code] I would like to do LA for this number. |
[QUOTE=swellman;471604]15120 curves @B1=43M yielded no factors. Now running 12000 curves @t60 level. Marin has been updated.[/QUOTE]
12000 curves @B1=260M completed with no factors found with C184 cofactor of L3865B. Marin updated. Poly search scheduled to start next week. |
15e Candidate
[b]QUEUED[/b] C262 from the OPN MWRB file for 15e queue.
[CODE]n: 1691258362240878280454178428210930093387995565018686454967377347094043699721437276517346006084343984994009127771016074764883067093211082213169148955695073468059507949955137578606583196114785524503032331459432916909161408179816042086760615819245979012488032667543 # 5393^71-1, difficulty: 268.69, skewness: 4.19, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 3.35598e+19, est. time: 15980.87 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 4.188 c6: 1 c0: -5393 Y1: -1 Y0: 605292152577983359632734706451399897723780801 m: 605292152577983359632734706451399897723780801 type: snfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 268000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 93 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 3.6[/CODE] Trial sieving 5K blocks. [CODE] Q Yield 20M 6457 60M 5730 100M 5715 150M 4646 200M 4793 250M 3885 300M 3849[/CODE] |
15e Candidate
[QUOTE=swellman;474414]12000 curves @B1=260M completed with no factors found with C184 cofactor of L3865B. Marin updated.
Poly search scheduled to start next week.[/QUOTE] Poly search complete. L3865B survived all ECM efforts, and now [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=474860&postcount=85]thanks to Max0526[/url] a poly has been found with a record setting e-score for a C184. Poly is repeated here for convenience. [code] n: 1251516986508717322323583052382284336136171549993041380955868385111197235307360385444235100079672151016701474271745769669221614486348266045684925884036811974151645364807120147382456261 skew: 155081925.86 c0: 3258381761015893322703469355508610515519640008 c1: 994948670578842945305212888379095752533 c2: -11449251905133422400956610990120 c3: -69609283675092247656887 c4: 438761968162182 c5: 1519560 Y0: -510262266069797436279473833437161562 Y1: 3739355384257464468353 # norm 6.135551e-18 alpha -9.140155 e 4.696e-14 rroots 5 [/code] |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.