15e Candidate
 

[b]QUEUED[/b] C254 from the OPN MWRB file for the 15e siever.
[CODE]n: 16217623429519447665770331331234191617830657739056976241325545935071016487291689396910718629448531940462354331150908723291525188932655677244804366689033392520186152594766096800444961208969165612248705939744316323472203043824345842420862282162372999558193
# 6863^67-1, difficulty: 257.05, skewness: 0.23, alpha: 0.00
# cost: 1.41591e+19, est. time: 6742.41 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 0.229
c6: 6863
c0: -1
Y1: -1
Y0: 1590940683676811073936298865652272041928687
m: 1590940683676811073936298865652272041928687
type: snfs
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7[/CODE]
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
[CODE] Q Yield
20M 9424
60M 7603
100M 7279
150M 6018
200M 5826[/CODE]

[b]QUEUED[/b] C176 from the OPN t600 file.
[CODE]n: 33784021118970858265370482603424977883022766295305410917003959764526982763948334199910994392375958208766994770384031443139142378900585511095542471832062502501985884907263072381
# 47009039042447030231489^11-1, difficulty: 226.72, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 2.22
# cost: 1.33235e+18, est. time: 634.45 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 1.000
c5: 1
c4: 1
c3: -4
c2: -3
c1: 3
c0: 1
Y1: -47009039042447030231489
Y0: 2209849751694309200974241233614941108927157122
m: 6329499096068265712687939244299844781098127210644487053753318819095948684373199228494673211769695914480810181532893005826675507820918472218991005122296792316301292945634979389
type: snfs
rlim: 67000000
alim: 67000000
lpbr: 30
lpba: 30
mfbr: 60
mfba: 60
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6[/CODE]
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
[CODE] Q Yield
20M 10786
50M 11111
80M 9712[/CODE]

14e Candidate
 

[b]QUEUED[/b] C230_137_84 is ready for SNFS on 14e.
[code]
n: 12502076715723291670940262374503895561515752176468277072102656390265501094162597937587053683058322813182485259258738440289299155468566624475685603750324147628994031284830728438367455673182146252193291725477933152658684773668625493
# 137^84+84^137, difficulty: 266.45, anorm: 3.67e+037, rnorm: 8.86e+049
# scaled difficulty: 268.52, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 6.187e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 8.002e-014, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 266
skew: 1.0464
c6: 16
c0: 21
Y1: -820517673944445067756173565489
Y0: 90655380226775924938050450323019805545725952
rlim: 268000000
alim: 450000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.8
alambda: 2.8
[/code]


Test sieving with Q in blocks of 10K.
[code]
Q=20M 18940
Q=80M 15545
Q=150M 15230
Q=250M 13212
Q=350M 12098
[/code]
Suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-360M for a target # relations of 490M.

GNFS
 

[b]QUEUED[/b] C160 from the OPN t600 file.
(a.k.a. phi_5(phi_47(17)) - I think :smile: ) ✔️
[CODE]n: 2653276588733970207986066872864284162001100132929743202968477667206366748729406698928782335735456063416805822121192211762064229032218628291177377783638712810251
# 423622795798733187216959754496018087627393990881167960767^5-1 (P57^5-1)
# expecting poly E from 1.36e-12 to > 1.56e-12
# skew 4510792.90, size 1.644e-15, alpha -8.256, combined = 1.514e-12 rroots = 5
lss: 0
Y0: -4716730817556692379820492055174
Y1: 7569585004308053
c0: -302850131623700376775316372745371942775
c1: 530322955589312794780134608784539
c2: 585805943512121933916198565
c3: -38949566665577518063
c4: -27886916154114
c5: 1136520
skew: 4510792.90
type: gnfs
rlim: 67000000
alim: 67000000
lpbr: 30
lpba: 30
mfbr: 60
mfba: 60
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6[/CODE]
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
[CODE] Q Yield
20M 11214
50M 9992
80M 8241[/CODE]

[b]QUEUED[/b] 13*2^828-1:
[code]n: 675220304271879058159839399473570713107203656532664891177442252585591644435696912037141295999148987268643467492131117445573285733440642969469247150569723987749269348218195059012486839404025403117
m: 348449143727040986586495598010130648530944
type: snfs
size: 251
skew: 0.67
c6: 13
c0: -1
rlim: 120000000
alim: 120000000
lpbr: 33
lpba: 33
mfbr: 66
mfba: 66
rlambda: 2.8
alambda: 2.8[/code]

Suggested sieve range of 15M to 190M for ~630M relations
Test-sieving: 2K blocks on a broadwell @ 1.1ghz (ultrabook)
[code]Q=20M 9525 rels 0.082 sec/rel
Q=40M 8010 rels 0.088 sec/rel
Q=60M 8155 rels 0.117 sec/rel
Q=90M 6682 rels 0.124 sec/rel
Q=120M 6734 rels 0.131 sec/rel
Q=150M 6414 rels 0.141 sec/rel
Q=180M 3871 rels 0.169 sec/rel[/code]

I also test-sieved 32/64, and a sieve range of 15-225M should yield 410M relations. I think 33LP is substantially more efficient, and I wish to continue to collect data about required # of relations for these small 33LP projects.

I would like to do the LA for this number.

Another 15e candidate
 

[b]QUEUED[/b] C225_127_99 is ready for SNFS on 15e.
[code]
n: 564280433004452015236556792394701657194917623343788536845376026778042758362415675160082823240324647608311925669082853802958506382647614589778632315160410710968915743060180745896065226287405803602833365880648559555060804218619
# 127^99+99^127, difficulty: 255.35, anorm: 4.29e+032, rnorm: -5.48e+056
# scaled difficulty: 259.37, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 7.353e-018, alpha = 0.000, combined = 4.187e-014, rroots = 1
type: snfs
size: 255
skew: 5.5194
c5: 3
c0: 15367
Y1: -233346407819744031602621847468621430290111891007497
Y0: 1191446152405248657777607437681912764659201
rlim: 268000000
alim: 268000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.8
alambda: 2.8
[/code]


Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 2K:
[code]
Q=30M 4120
Q=60M 4387
Q=90M 4626
Q=130M 4820
Q=190M 5331
Q=250M 4652
[/code]
Suggesting a sieving range of 30M-230M for Q with a target # rels = 480M.

[b]QUEUED[/b] C212 from the OPN t600 file.
[CODE]n: 16162234374030954651062542469324941508405506194622290501101866664751734964448062528589459783403444764703106052467195460430696272229863871290077241590772985371501246636945120829551322430809412338842281631760237413
# 14009^59-1, difficulty: 248.78, skewness: 4.91, alpha: 0.00
# cost: 7.56693e+18, est. time: 3603.30 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 4.910
c6: 1
c0: -14009
Y1: -1
Y0: 291119537669624727213343933518641575244401
m: 291119537669624727213343933518641575244401
type: snfs
rlim: 268000000
alim: 268000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.6
alambda: 2.6[/CODE]
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
[CODE] Q Yield
20M 6704
60M 5682
100M 5140
150M 4443
200M 4229
250M 3862[/CODE]

[b]QUEUED[/b] C230_142_86 is ready for SNFS on 14e.
[code]
n: 19744386475034050653672331167908740062431308313374369896927339908981716472382627191713525694330229604408588023130266982594198522719114382632677104677626710842524066667955795757569172819102654136306198926632420362647012461543564061
# 142^86+86^142, difficulty: 252.08, anorm: 1.22e+040, rnorm: 2.41e+047
# scaled difficulty: 253.29, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 4.760e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 7.204e-014, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 252
skew: 11.5142
c6: 4
c0: 9320809
Y1: -82721210695570328927708881
Y0: 817547311848210312851967482654905401754112
rlim: 268000000
alim: 450000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.8
alambda: 2.8
[/code]


Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 2K.
[code]
Q=30M 3728
Q=70M 3085
Q=120M 2693
Q=180M 2158
Q=280M 2229
Q=400M 1624
[/code]
Suggesting a sieving range for Q of 30M-440M with target # relations = 470M.

May I call a moratorium on adding new 14e entries while we have 12 essentially fully-sieved ones without a post-processor?

I'll throw some cycles at helping to clear this backlog.

[QUOTE=fivemack;470946]May I call a moratorium on adding new 14e entries while we have 12 essentially fully-sieved ones without a post-processor?[/QUOTE]

You can easily do that since the majority of the 14e tasks are done by Gridcoin users which are sieving randomly. By not feeding the 14e they will process more 15 and 16 tasks.

Or ask Greg to give less priority to 14e tasks on the overall balance, can’t remember what was the % breakdown for each application.