![]() |
2 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=jyb;441949]Ugh, > 25% duplicates is unfortunate. We can add more work, but as you know we get diminishing returns: lower yield and even more duplicates. What were the matrix dimensions when you built with td=120?[/QUOTE]
If I remember 15M^2, on mobile, laptop is shutdown. Edit: Please see attached files. |
C182_133_62
Reserving C182_133_62 (14e).
|
Reserving 3+2_508 (14e).
|
Reserving 11+3_233 (14e).
|
Reserving C194_137_54 (14e).
|
Reserving C178_140_114 (14e).
|
3+2_508 (14e) factored.
[code]
p95 factor: 11622874792611234968702305808541602290015677074553136733170642314719475354673512445067151791089 p107 factor: 51054626981574775795092422388187510552832029333693342053033448138799735254453778153393050758124770391455841 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/yedy1k8M[/url] |
Reserving C202_123_83.
|
11+3_233 (14e) factored.
[code]
p54 factor: 179846610543259420904139041379488185738255245458259233 p62 factor: 28033335291007775905004289994192886154977250603613590078697331 p94 factor: 1517629925334252052981271363542870822457168559242405434898027364782939236910687144400880379723 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/zEZTA6vC[/url] |
Reserving 5-2_349 (14e).
|
C194_137_54 (14e) factored.
[code]
p74 factor: 37251883246484342574287893071792659159686404328110339986829041188837708493 p120 factor: 284857329473808207600778718001418119314864589236880356948502384043990423263018665259059445892686754532803413182978085629 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/zLc9gFBk[/url] |
Reserving 11-3_233 (14e).
|
C182_136_109 done
1 Attachment(s)
[code]
Sun Sep 11 21:55:52 2016 p70 factor: 1625244220099893951136632831253782047688647555668414568274074771033603 Sun Sep 11 21:55:52 2016 p113 factor: 19523276296641103159813438399199538723743885854988253153517221837886500041396626502001149360453500516130712108337 [/code] 79.5 hours on 7 threads E5-2650v2 for 12.36M matrix at density 155 (160 didn't work). Log attached and at [url]http://pastebin.com/8QGaYru4[/url] |
Reserving C275_150_116
update: with 501044957 relations, 375841880 unique, density-140 doesn't work and density-130 does. Matrix is 23.6M, ETA 330 hours on 7 threads E5-2650v2. |
Reserving C236_128_81.
|
Will 136^105+105^136 cofactor(15e) fit onto 16GB. If so I would like to reserve it. Also may I request some support on which value of TD should be used? Thank you in advance.
Carlos |
C178_140_114 (14e) factored.
[code]
p77 factor: 56359415713758422376837845758080456237089454921168934763314271001375690861421 p101 factor: 22168818909285295688831460877299357285706495486170991377318936746983584980876798150724299984839253441 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/3UgwSt2V[/url] |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;442350]Will 136^105+105^136 cofactor(15e) fit onto 16GB. If so I would like to reserve it. Also may I request some support on which value of TD should be used? Thank you in advance.
Carlos[/QUOTE] I don't think it will fit in 16GB; and I expect that it will take really quite a long time to process, so I'd ideally want a post-processor willing to dedicate a dual Xeon E5v3 to the job; if I can't find one of those I will use my heaviest machine. |
[QUOTE=fivemack;442399]I don't think it will fit in 16GB; and I expect that it will take really quite a long time to process, so I'd ideally want a post-processor willing to dedicate a dual Xeon E5v3 to the job; if I can't find one of those I will use my heaviest machine.[/QUOTE]
Thank you. instead I'll take next 11+2_232. |
5-2_349 (14e) factored.
[code]
p53 factor: 14487018674856045577516403460196086299057074020508013 p174 factor: 940761631266562254843890915560554694187236007467661447907078365120189071950375177761515637901401566358450238557072111308837554703833860699687205618685114918062617855980937507 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/km1hzw2y[/url] |
5+4_347 (14e) Factored
1 Attachment(s)
[CODE]
Wed Sep 14 14:26:59 2016 prp88 factor: 3527500241184357141009872283004712704673339795852908184850523961396087333117589259749121 Wed Sep 14 14:26:59 2016 prp115 factor: 1209124221308511118247711000663108819289733412308024474982625427011739779496789556310431795014397908596756219092807 [/CODE] [url]http://pastebin.com/2kPvbA9y[/url] |
11-3_233 (14e) factored.
[code]
p110 factor: 54268481449280215840198360924838255215252555210331813793874392538308304682756053165706186679970465596514656071 p124 factor: 3180636421215086419421510383588502483627598789271555466138233449167799049803524721986809686719398104069819983642297733288827 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/xJQMnJ9w[/url] |
Taking C231_129_74 (14e)
|
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;442611]Taking C231_129_74 (14e)[/QUOTE]
Managed to build a 13^2 matrix with TD=120 which LA will take me 170 hours on 4 cores, 33% duplicates. Hence we are on a low 14e crunch participation, LA will be run, but can I request next time, for composites above 200 digits, to aim for more raw relations, push up to 270-280M relations? Also have the poly been verified? Thank you. Carlos |
Reserving 11-4_233.
|
C269_140_83 (15e)
Been working on C269_140_83 for awhile. Finally got it through filtering but now it's almost been a week just building the matrix. I think I'm out on the fringe with my system (16Gb memory) but trying to push through. I'll keep going until the end of the month - if it isn't built by then it will never happen. This effort has taken 5x longer than any previous 32-bit job I've attempted.
Can hardly wait to see the ETA if it makes it that far! |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;442674]Managed to build a 13^2 matrix with TD=120 which LA will take me 170 hours on 4 cores, 33% duplicates. Hence we are on a low 14e crunch participation, LA will be run, but can I request next time, for composites above 200 digits, to aim for more raw relations, push up to 270-280M relations? Also have the poly been verified?
Thank you. Carlos[/QUOTE] This is very strange: until recently the numbers on the 14e queue routinely got around 220M relations and managed to post-process just fine. And that included many which were well over 200 digits. I can't see any reason that 250M relations shouldn't have been more than enough. Can anybody explain why there were 33% duplicates? That seems awfully high. By contrast, 11+2_232 has about 21% duplicates, which is much more in line with other jobs I've seen. I think that routinely going up to 270M relations is a waste; I'd rather take these pathological cases on an individual basis and handle them as necessary. I.e. we can throw more relations at C231_129_74 if you want, and perhaps we'll end up with a net decrease in time, even accounting for having to start the post-processing over. Or perhaps not, but in any case I'd rather not assume that all jobs will be this bad. Let me know if you want more sieving for this one. |
Jon, no more relations needed hence I am already running LA. This issue of high duplicates only happens on XYYXF composites above 200 digits. It's the second time this happens to me, first time LA was above 240 hours, this time I've decided to post-process this one.
In the meantime Jon will run 11+2_232 which I've reserved a week back due to be running C231_129_74 instead. |
Reserving 8-3_269 (14e).
|
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;442760]This issue of high duplicates only happens on XYYXF composites above 200 digits. [/QUOTE]
How many relations per Q were you getting? Did the yield drop noticeably towards the end of the range? If so it might be better to push for higher yield (larger siever or large prime bounds). Chris |
Reserving 11+5_233 (14e).
|
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=swellman;441962]Reserving C182_133_62 (14e).[/QUOTE]
[code] prp89 factor: 29238510415742384723191168697043936022542358136804378061632850708554486116665074878579787 prp93 factor: 396159525132327285954369118335769965355463117165763054078706610445744969489515357164549706179 [/code] |
C182_133_62 (14e).
[QUOTE=swellman;442932][code] prp89 factor: 29238510415742384723191168697043936022542358136804378061632850708554486116665074878579787 prp93 factor: 396159525132327285954369118335769965355463117165763054078706610445744969489515357164549706179 [/code][/QUOTE] Pastebin url: [URL]http://pastebin.com/ELUnDaVx[/URL] |
A billion here, a billion there ...
Taking C272_136_105; this is probably a sensible time to try out latest-msieve with MPI on the quad Opteron.
|
Taking C224_136_106.
|
11-4_233 completed - 42 hours on 8M matrix (TD=136)
[CODE]prp67 factor: 1615385864022181418335598709817449001210276025526559081395120245477 prp164 factor: 38842082667779915764425031800433446627379180853547433459873604555683869599968998721519470185828270404555651168869770129686428280173770355132305415659077491668430977[/CODE][URL]http://pastebin.com/8fYyRJ6g[/URL] C236_128_81 completed - 69 hours on 9.8M matrix (TD=135) [CODE]prp55 factor: 2865791377241944666703404515160723991850326100480779977 prp182 factor: 32387876852124571210980517541219962634107811937944256239858145782289558964726870121395173377882427203136610068405351015060634583213098836430460786172410448122636204020550276233244179 [/CODE][URL]http://pastebin.com/ZiA3kY77[/URL] |
[QUOTE=fivemack;442956]Taking C272_136_105; this is probably a sensible time to try out latest-msieve with MPI on the quad Opteron.[/QUOTE]
Please share with us the msieve log after LA starts. Thank you in advance. |
11+2_232 (14e) factored.
[code]
p56 factor: 26694333891928959916655095132163969612103752008786438673 p168 factor: 178665625928880406263733381516259578548430343540590707213422697968238205241779770690469672083376744291940226152037716201280695287207752889818318169586201087982389582369 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/G5hiRXR7[/url] |
8-3_269 (14e) factored.
[code]
p56 factor: 15463836510489436598415666216335367514626514135509301507 p133 factor: 6961346020341521273825525531716406444313495215121125954389850325759028001525140291989638164585183961540066442636415489676126416105219 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/jnh9Jcw3[/url] |
Reserving 8+5_269 (14e).
|
[QUOTE=swellman;442693]Been working on C269_140_83 for awhile. Finally got it through filtering but now it's almost been a week just building the matrix. I think I'm out on the fringe with my system (16Gb memory) but trying to push through. I'll keep going until the end of the month - if it isn't built by then it will never happen. This effort has taken 5x longer than any previous 32-bit job I've attempted.
Can hardly wait to see the ETA if it makes it that far![/QUOTE] The matrix is finally built but it's all a lost cause. ETA is decades in length, and progress is glacial. I don't have enough memory or horsepower. Please release C269_140_83. I hope someone else can postprocess it! [b]Reserving the cofactor of 150^122+122^150[/b] |
[QUOTE=swellman;443023]Please release C269_140_83. I hope someone else can postprocess it!
[B]Reserving the cofactor of 150^122+122^150[/B][/QUOTE] 150^122+122^150 [B]SNFS(277.63)[/B] seems even tougher than 140^83+83^140 [B]SNFS(270.82)[/B] |
[QUOTE=unconnected;443025]150^122+122^150 [B]SNFS(277.63)[/B] seems even tougher than 140^83+83^140 [B]SNFS(270.82)[/B][/QUOTE]
Indeed but I've done a SNFS 271 in the past with no problems. Not sure why 140_83 was so difficult. A 30M x 30M matrix had its problems, but I think my eyes were too big for my stomach. I can post the log file if it will help. I'm willing to attempt 150_122. Should know quickly if I can post process it (once it has enough relations). |
Reserving C212_138_53 (14e).
|
[QUOTE=swellman;443027]Indeed but I've done a SNFS 271 in the past with no problems. Not sure why 140_83 was so difficult. A 30M x 30M matrix had its problems, but I think my eyes were too big for my stomach. I can post the log file if it will help.
I'm willing to attempt 150_122. Should know quickly if I can post process it (once it has enough relations).[/QUOTE] Do you think it would help to do more sieving on C269_140_83? Say another 50M relations? |
[QUOTE=jyb;443031]Do you think it would help to do more sieving on C269_140_83? Say another 50M relations?[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure but usually I can read 32-bit jobs into memory and postprocess with only a few complaints from my system. This composite drank memory like a sponge and my system just couldn't run LA after the matrix was finally built. I think it's just too big for me but I'm willing to try again if more relations are added, maybe a higher TD would help (I used TD=130)? |
11+5_233 (14e) factored
[code]
p83 factor: 89924363526609478441451550341199291672323172034030431514992942534863308314735106429 p128 factor: 82166813913486588479110582880897205365471804935373013724621832979805599282412789990531853408372393288384208484049790807103334207 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/4YTJAwp0[/url] |
Reserving C208_148_104 (14e).
|
I have put a further 100MQ onto C269_140_83 and will attack it with the biggest hammers I have. Reserving.
If I'm going to queue up jobs which are slightly too difficult, it should at least be my hammers that I break on them. |
C275_150_116 (23.3M matrix @ TD=136):
[CODE]Tue Sep 13 12:01:07 2016 found 126419294 hash collisions in 502133477 relations Tue Sep 13 12:01:29 2016 added 1 free relations Tue Sep 13 12:01:29 2016 commencing duplicate removal, pass 2 Tue Sep 13 13:35:39 2016 found 126374785 duplicates and 375758693 unique relations[/CODE] C260_140_81 (20M matrix @ TD=130): [CODE]Wed Jul 27 03:53:34 2016 found 118384806 hash collisions in 495023007 relations Wed Jul 27 03:53:53 2016 added 1 free relations Wed Jul 27 03:53:53 2016 commencing duplicate removal, pass 2 Wed Jul 27 05:20:40 2016 found 113561203 duplicates and 381461805 unique relations[/CODE] C269_140_83 (TD=132 fails, TD=128 in progress): [CODE]Mon Sep 19 12:18:26 2016 found 116619041 hash collisions in 452743675 relations Mon Sep 19 12:18:49 2016 commencing duplicate removal, pass 2 Mon Sep 19 13:45:32 2016 found 121479559 duplicates and 331264116 unique relations[/CODE] Slightly higher duplicate rate (26.8% vs 25.1 and 22.9) and lower total relations count (~450M vs ~500M). I think some additional sieving might help. |
Reserving C226_137_55 (14e)
|
Reserving C216_131_67 (14e).
|
8+5_269 (14e) factored.
[code]
p57 factor: 144634550005144012394556473761464101037202524255042947201 p74 factor: 24805434071997993282532003128799915549528807696805969591771635831810351201 p87 factor: 148746139150525570868647881109099643901257080336477904818444653646359078676644606058093 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/r95zpdSD[/url] |
C208_148_104 (14e) factored.
[code]
p76 factor: 3457372140032984863823614003269041839306797771416136725748879592075015553737 p133 factor: 1272864535670886248048062629923026028500560176035581900987646350865622446092101294885985566657620957521308271469159418615815056412721 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/8U8gJhB4[/url] |
C212_138_53 (14e) factored.
[code]
p71 factor: 38361721901344222024133097768263453234490787219142822621687261809090951 p141 factor: 313306196040914366136178007716638152853894646006862176032869930867063840746065695907626215250919316559132342213048037392784723239294579192261 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/nHVrPtzZ[/url] |
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;442611]Taking C231_129_74 (14e)[/QUOTE]
Should have the factors in within 12 hours. I will then start C226_137_55 hoping it will not take 6 days as C231_129_74. |
C216_131_67 (14e) factored.
[code]
p86 factor: 93537630621161588114431806553755417559978288113854213202598666270725176900274640318763 p130 factor: 3681161945529908057089521204873403128198055247923966652695555310151162718722548337512971071061855840154227486170600103185397093931 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/zAYVL2tq[/url] |
C231_129_74 (14e) Factored
1 Attachment(s)
Nice split!!!
[CODE] Thu Sep 22 21:52:35 2016 prp115 factor: 5148651099025048956721313320685992289080871248266127088155111567785542305510189958854446603245585145155512096180349 Thu Sep 22 21:52:35 2016 prp116 factor: 42768236978363088666881788505114014789876202235874384371386619947895556487505258092408466363578035617363894422855261 [/CODE] [url]http://pastebin.com/u011V2wN[/url] |
Reserving C162_933436_12559 (14e)
|
Reserving C227_124_85 (14e).
|
135^109+109^135 Factored
1 Attachment(s)
[code]
prp72 factor: 978565968924483425382263961480233408815037814502051456105779764121914183 prp109 factor: 2929842661984090798217929968282138600153392406190996246161028706583008524360649211184929775234325778886028099 [/code] |
[QUOTE=swellman;443313][code]
prp72 factor: 978565968924483425382263961480233408815037814502051456105779764121914183 prp109 factor: 2929842661984090798217929968282138600153392406190996246161028706583008524360649211184929775234325778886028099 [/code][/QUOTE] [SIZE=2] [/SIZE][B][SIZE=2]135^109+109^135[/SIZE][/B] [url]http://pastebin.com/qJCZ3C0R[/url] |
Reserving C229_123_88 (14e).
|
C226_137_55 (14e) factored
1 Attachment(s)
C226_137_55 (14e) factored
[CODE] Sun Sep 25 17:32:23 2016 prp63 factor: 165354796458345914605165139424482992513332726208359487846383977 Sun Sep 25 17:32:23 2016 prp164 factor: 28375739241182213806145712923564050394266902673515697209488423961051903418812580320357686672456691080107405632391671848967580919735009082963332078928674035206236369 [/CODE] [url]http://pastebin.com/EX10Vnee[/url] |
C227_124_85 (14e) factored.
[code]
p60 factor: 108800212826185001374072706568640952716258373676667659183611 p168 factor: 268393154893542681183106817555725677151729799204719680086858184705601906445700826230614132065660947457716923168152947284183185289581945455744297230014704572871699264497 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/vMSFx8Q5[/url] |
Reserving C239_150_41.
|
Reserving C201_125_82 (14e).
|
C275_150_116 done
1 Attachment(s)
[code]
Mon Sep 26 06:01:54 2016 p78 factor: 122139714038731020536111602858614657766864371087731914277412046815193700189713 Mon Sep 26 06:01:54 2016 p198 factor: 459580917850105287889065963726778800602609609542195130258147374296364925814360418843819514368120005206867026715293706940462991970029221739198362427369877895867613884626968300460272814965030462114657 [/code] About 291 hours on 7 cores E5-2650v2 for 23.6M density-130 matrix. Log attached and at [url]http://pastebin.com/iaj9ZpNS[/url] |
C272_136_105 update
It takes 34 hours to filter the billion relations once (reading from RAID0 hard discs, it might be a bit faster from NVMe SSD). At density 128 I get a 43.64M matrix and a report of 22.3GB memory use at the start of the clique-removal phase. Currently filtering at density 160; binary search at a day and a half per test is tedious but not impractical.
I have done larger matrices in the past ("1539 hours on six cores i7/4930K for the 48.3M^2 matrix") and I now have an i7/5820K, so this is tractable; should definitely be done by Christmas, probably won't be done by American-Thanksgiving. |
[QUOTE=fivemack;443502]It takes 34 hours to filter the billion relations once (reading from RAID0 hard discs, it might be a bit faster from NVMe SSD). At density 128 I get a 43.64M matrix and a report of 22.3GB memory use at the start of the clique-removal phase. Currently filtering at density 160; binary search at a day and a half per test is tedious but not impractical.
I have done larger matrices in the past ("1539 hours on six cores i7/4930K for the 48.3M^2 matrix") and I now have an i7/5820K, so this is tractable; should definitely be done by Christmas, probably won't be done by American-Thanksgiving.[/QUOTE] Thought you would run it on the quad Opteron. |
I might well run on quad-Opteron; but I am not quite sure how fast the quad-Opteron is, and wanted to give a confident upper limit for how long it will take.
|
Reserving C247_125_102 (14e).
|
C162_933436_12559 (14e) factored
1 Attachment(s)
[CODE]
Tue Sep 27 08:29:47 2016 prp60 factor: 433328057471963535475051884722727910540041333811954428906409 Tue Sep 27 08:29:47 2016 prp103 factor: 1836760932781372453339385014048732690710138798072783324685422035366176565158346559315291406497948996191 [/CODE] [url]http://pastebin.com/8aikG5Zj[/url] |
C269_140_83 is indeed a beast - didn't make a matrix at td=128 even with 540M relations, 386.7M unique. Sieving yet further.
|
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=fivemack;443572]C269_140_83 is indeed a beast - didn't make a matrix at td=128 even with 540M relations, 386.7M unique. Sieving yet further.[/QUOTE]
I've successfully filtered dataset with TD=140. Log attached. |
Ah, I am an idiot, and filtered it with td=160 twice, rather than td=128 once and td=160 the next time. Cancelled as much of the further sieving as I could.
|
Reserving C234_138_82 (14e).
|
C201_125_82 (14e) factored.
[code]
p91 factor: 5533475616401567841326867453284467917398005315926678964113781512626662360083576926219463401 p110 factor: 37701399530315590397373615017888955912666101957608885034322691299070668370225358470067134849839003976637396581 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/LkLGkBpw[/url] |
C229_123_88 (14e) factored.
[code]
p79 factor: 1604428323656418568140798986444257526403115344416581151625421261002740361200201 p151 factor: 1034695267026469510825870205820197162343755102858473372200655810431132741948362512666641487675319092282102790267903692074346841364807397469058260751209 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/K1171DXx[/url] |
Reserving C223_136_94 (14e).
|
C269_140_83 proceeding
Running 26.53M td=140 matrix on 7 cores E5-2650v2, ETA is 16 October or so
|
C234_138_82 (14e) factored.
[code]
p60 factor: 198566780391516333466979918485489973406554508962919599935933 p175 factor: 2670610419586578422735455583187707494424814746099604560519075128840087909728190542826707824004421986666795569399042032093668809700773270322830872792949388809512088815080196069 [/code] Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/wcZqt59j[/url] |
C224_136_106 completed - 39 hours for 7.1M matrix (TD=140).
[CODE]prp80 factor: 31869591719072312524644154686841605670559044226594989957722430280802116661852001 prp145 factor: 1004782420482738797439106645641556265308176966982090005013618863463495853646260123110300256540036585837528291559794696257836406040087078445985261 [/CODE] [url]http://pastebin.com/SNDSVeM5[/url] |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=swellman;442137]Reserving C202_123_83.[/QUOTE]
[code] prp76 factor: 6006490461612398856004625892761104423301331101779782894056231958246323079721 prp127 factor: 1530696673753199114478516370936327915177260703365572131981495926137989287039012186143511064030388799180343451837788499294774731 [/code] |
C202_123_83
[QUOTE=swellman;443938][code]
prp76 factor: 6006490461612398856004625892761104423301331101779782894056231958246323079721 prp127 factor: 1530696673753199114478516370936327915177260703365572131981495926137989287039012186143511064030388799180343451837788499294774731 [/code][/QUOTE] Here you are. [url]http://pastebin.com/VZ80VMcY[/url] |
Thanks!
|
Reserving C249_125_106 (14e).
|
C239_150_41 completed - 68 hours for 9.3M matrix (TD=136).
[CODE]prp70 factor: 5573808371477678255738883850463022374141535506116089546713709505235789 prp169 factor: 1854272927169276064850887004050243072105672113242314686648175280530202174026565541532603743660788541125673011694475373536628721134487431239810400723445551406647707113703 [/CODE] [url]http://pastebin.com/g0XWdg9d[/url] |
Reserving C232_126_107 (14e).
|
C272_136_105 running
After a slightly laborious process, I am now running a 42.84M density-136 matrix on the quad-socket Opteron, and it claims an ETA of 9th November.
|
C223_136_94 (14e) Factored
1 Attachment(s)
[CODE]
Wed Oct 05 16:38:51 2016 prp53 factor: 59926971424990774933296160825639988912012508034747853 Wed Oct 05 16:38:51 2016 prp170 factor: 34522533844767796264625726888673261984658348111326980479275943327756770544196386944828574528514932028688327114435011695122070301194534465822583200327194989806151944664201 [/CODE] [url]http://pastebin.com/2cbikH7A[/url] |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=swellman;440010]Reserving 133^103+103^133 (15e).[/QUOTE]
[code] prp62 factor: 36267862335462156968450359498540930745710115476634352293229239 prp119 factor: 38580518421588896287956426247830519443411603381583739500677655620564242291769727022369026554796555188565966083124542507 [/code] |
[QUOTE=swellman;444527][code]
prp62 factor: 36267862335462156968450359498540930745710115476634352293229239 prp119 factor: 38580518421588896287956426247830519443411603381583739500677655620564242291769727022369026554796555188565966083124542507 [/code][/QUOTE] [url]http://pastebin.com/cpxPYBdY[/url] |
Taking C215_145_46 (14e).
|
C247_125_102 (14e) Factored
1 Attachment(s)
[code]
prp62 factor: 59786380396149291444954334749913876838555924354422636969832219 prp72 factor: 674131076468256477085824299061444013922152102284468603183476353346792519 prp113 factor: 40382332593663947539524476917272444037308680364101727170902239853976006510973265962213908024243013148654687832431 [/code] |
[QUOTE=swellman;444775][code]
prp62 factor: 59786380396149291444954334749913876838555924354422636969832219 prp72 factor: 674131076468256477085824299061444013922152102284468603183476353346792519 prp113 factor: 40382332593663947539524476917272444037308680364101727170902239853976006510973265962213908024243013148654687832431 [/code][/QUOTE] C247_125_102 (14e) Factored [url]http://pastebin.com/eHgAvNYa[/url] |
The following integers are ready for post-processing, support is appreciated:
[B]14e queue[/B] C237_137_56 C200_133_65 C225_149_42 C237_141_52 Until Friday if C200_133_65 is still available I will reserve it. In the meantime C215_145_46 is scheduled to finish this Saturday morning. Thank you all. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.