results C153 C154 C155
 

[B]C153_P233_plus_1[/B]
[code]
prp57 factor: 976091661440498273311588215450771879582220118969346171503
prp96 factor: 430335904840578306669039776242416581629866475129170214872930601654724618834763764783224209970307[/code]
matrix is 4140851 x 4141076 (1976.1 MB)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[B]C154_P182_plus_1[/B]
[code]prp71 factor: 27277576813606975571844943309761673123428776562927433726921949754679613
prp84 factor: 171066199323584838258211112753849127051765672129864072245708787815508766170527186951[/code]
matrix is 4358959 x 4359184 (2091.8 MB)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

C155
 

[B]C155_P209_plus_1[/B]
[code]prp74 factor: 10346196175428152102773520718167922375362025229971136961917614228903776537
prp82 factor: 4105695312892115636553366234774522477274854964663968305029273169198918335942867279
[/code]matrix is 4502743 x 4502968 (2160.1 MB)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

All filtered with TD=130, LA took 10-12h each, logs attached (couldn't add 3 attachments to one post).

For the 14e numbers, I've added a pastebin field for the unique part of a pastebin url containing the log. If that is populated, on the status page the comment becomes a link to the corresponding pastebin. :smile:

Edit: Now 15e has been given the same treatment.

:ttu:

My msieve logs for pastebin url.

Much better and cleaner now.
Thanks Greg!

4261-67 done
 

[code]
Sat Dec 5 09:09:56 2015 p68 factor: 99713931517486444010746977398434147387312495439028057685457930885581
Sat Dec 5 09:09:56 2015 p115 factor: 6337366248063930626919828317773198377075808129453921717685844042320912353140083589239167509613707066272579659320439
[/code]

34.4 hours on 7 threads E5-2650v2 for 9.04M matrix at density 120. Log attached.

2269-67 done
 

[code]
Sat Dec 5 17:44:54 2015 p91 factor: 2132511512443414333678564691107777973475861603076069009971937493950396472549072567490874627
Sat Dec 5 17:44:54 2015 p129 factor: 532873974251185874870260239618395036338610187500129178927301700770853208890035150980092485967757603488674407284211962191930161857
[/code]

8.3 hours for 4.63M density-120 matrix on 7 threads E5-2650v2.

Log attached.

The best TD for L1397 we can get is 108. Doesn't that mean the job is going to run significantly longer?

[code]Sat Dec 5 11:35:46 2015 setting target matrix density to 140.0
Sat Dec 5 16:00:06 2015 setting target matrix density to 130.0
Sat Dec 5 20:01:24 2015 setting target matrix density to 125.0
Sun Dec 6 09:13:49 2015 setting target matrix density to 120.0
Sun Dec 6 13:49:42 2015 setting target matrix density to 116.0
Sun Dec 6 20:20:04 2015 setting target matrix density to 112.0
Mon Dec 7 06:17:51 2015 setting target matrix density to 108.0[/code]

(We are still running 115!+1, which ended up with a TD of 116.)

:mike:

[QUOTE=Xyzzy;418506]The best TD for L1397 we can get is 108. Doesn't that mean the job is going to run significantly longer?[/quote]

Longer, but not significantly longer (in particular, definitely not enough longer to make up for the humans-editing-files cost involved in re-opening the sieving even if it doesn't end up right at the back of the queue again)

Have you got an ETA for 115!+1 ?

[QUOTE=fivemack;418511]Have you got an ETA for 115!+1 ?[/QUOTE]It should be done on or about December 14th.

We have found that our system's memory bandwidth limits us to using only three threads for optimal performance.

(Hopefully we are not holding anything up with our glacial progress!)

:mike: