[QUOTE=Speedy51;481260]Thank you for the suggestion. I would like to take the number in the paragraph above. I am aware number is ready. I will get in 5 to 6 hours from this post[/QUOTE]
I was looking at the wrong number it will be possibly a day or so before I download because the relations aren't at 0. I am aware you can download before the relations are at 0 I would prefer to wait

[QUOTE=Speedy51;481285]I would prefer to wait[/QUOTE]

It really makes no difference. The last few percent (read: last few million) will result in less than a 1% savings, if that, in the matrix step, so it will literally take you longer to wait.

+1; in fact, waiting may make the matrix more difficult to build, as many recent jobs have been oversieved to the point that reducing relations available builds a faster-to-solve matrix. If estimated relations remaining is below 2% of total relations, consider the job complete and proceed!

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;481304]+1; in fact, waiting may make the matrix more difficult to build, as many recent jobs have been oversieved to the point that reducing relations available builds a faster-to-solve matrix. If estimated relations remaining is below 2% of total relations, consider the job complete and proceed![/QUOTE]

Great. Thank you both for your responses. I will download in the morning as I do not think I will have enough time to download before I have to turn the computer off for the night

C235_136_73 done
 

[code]
p69 factor: 407537365103518118555484783641874762030851042640189824641870589461159
p166 factor: 7415510824152946485841062003906240962099629444305954366131218939233656347593641371304137420787310916165692118642314967563917378949006870526132071612346587125922823267
[/code]

189.6 hours on 7 cores E5-2650v2 for 18.39M density-124 (not 126) matrix. Log attached and at [url]https://pastebin.com/j587euCh[/url]

Taking C233_124_115

[QUOTE=Speedy51;481306]Great. Thank you both for your responses. I will download in the morning as I do not think I will have enough time to download before I have to turn the computer off for the night[/QUOTE]

@Speedy51 - did you end up downloading your composite? Which number?

The gatekeeper can note your reservation to avoid collisions but he will need your real name (if he doesn’t have it already).

[QUOTE=swellman;481421]@Speedy51 - did you end up downloading your composite? Which number?

The gatekeeper can note your reservation to avoid collisions but he will need your real name (if he doesn’t have it already).[/QUOTE]

Sean, he is Jarod.

[QUOTE=swellman;481421]@Speedy51 - did you end up downloading your composite? Which number?

The gatekeeper can note your reservation to avoid collisions but he will need your real name (if he doesn’t have it already).[/QUOTE]

I downloaded C192_988xx249_11. Thanks Carlos

[QUOTE=Dubslow;481293]It really makes no difference. The last few percent (read: last few million) will result in less than a 1% savings, if that, in the matrix step, so it will literally take you longer to wait.[/QUOTE]

I tried to build the this matrix with a TD= 120 & got the following message saying matrix probably couldn't be built. What am I best to do wait until relations drop to 0 (currently 85,233) and re-download/try another TD? This is the 1st time I have encountered such a message in the log file
[CODE]Sat Mar 03 16:46:38 2018 found 40246 cycles, need 2492828
Sat Mar 03 16:46:38 2018 too few cycles, matrix probably cannot build
[/CODE]

I would try density 112 before I bothered to re-download the relations file. If my connection were slow (home rather than work, for instance), I would try 108 also before waiting for the full set of relations and a re-download.