![]() |
GW_3_513
Does anyone want GW_3_513? If not and it will fit in 16 gig of RAM & there is no real rush for it e.g. 14 days running at roughly 12 hours a day I might be interested in taking it on
|
[QUOTE=Speedy51;406450]Does anyone want GW_3_513? If not and it will fit in 16 gig of RAM & there is no real rush for it e.g. 14 days running at roughly 12 hours a day I might be interested in taking it on[/QUOTE]
Why don't you take GW_10_239 instead? It will be faster to post-process. GW_10_239 SNFS(241) vs GW_3_513 SNFS(248). |
All tasks for which it is reasonable to use 14e fit in 16 GB of RAM - or in fact, pretty much always in 8 GB of RAM, unless the OS + other applications have a large footprint.
|
GW_10_239
[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;406452]Why don't you take GW_10_239 instead? It will be faster to post-process. GW_10_239 SNFS(241) vs GW_3_513 SNFS(248).[/QUOTE]
Sure I would be happy to take 10_239. The reason why I never thought of taking this is because the download size is almost double that of 3_513. Hence me thinking it would take twice as longs to process going by size. Currently 10_239 is 12 gig Est. Pending Rels 177399 remaining & 3_513 is 7 gig. It was late when I was looking at 3_513 I thought all of the work units had been processed this is not the case hence the size difference. The . DAT for 10_239 will be in the middle to late 20 gig range uncompressed. Thanks Carlos for pointing that out to me & I had forgotten about the numbers in brackets |
[QUOTE=debrouxl;406479]All tasks for which it is reasonable to use 14e fit in 16 GB of RAM - or in fact, pretty much always in 8 GB of RAM, unless the OS + other applications have a large footprint.[/QUOTE]
Thank you handy to know |
P58^5-1?
What is the latest status of the sieving? The 15e statistics listed on the NFS@Home site seem a bit strange for this number.
I believe I can complete the LA if it's available but don't want to step on toes if someone has tacitly reserved it. |
[QUOTE=Speedy51;406450]Does anyone want GW_3_513? If not and it will fit in 16 gig of RAM & there is no real rush for it e.g. 14 days running at roughly 12 hours a day I might be interested in taking it on[/QUOTE]
Do you still want GW_3_513? I can do it instead if you think it will take too long on your PC. [QUOTE=swellman;406572]What is the latest status of the sieving? The 15e statistics listed on the NFS@Home site seem a bit strange for this number. I believe I can complete the LA if it's available but don't want to step on toes if someone has tacitly reserved it.[/QUOTE] [SIZE=2]William [/SIZE][SIZE=2](wblipp) proposed [/SIZE][SIZE=2][SIZE=2]and did ECM [/SIZE]on the number, I don't know if he also wants to do the post-processing. [URL]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=396408&postcount=35[/URL] [URL]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=400543&postcount=94[/URL] I'll send him a PM. [/SIZE] |
[QUOTE=VictordeHolland;406575]
[SIZE=2]William [/SIZE][SIZE=2](wblipp) proposed [/SIZE][SIZE=2][SIZE=2]and did ECM [/SIZE]on the number, I don't know if he also wants to do the post-processing. [URL]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=396408&postcount=35[/URL] [URL]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=400543&postcount=94[/URL] I'll send him a PM. [/SIZE][/QUOTE] Thanks. I'll wait and see if he plans on working it. There are other numbers I can post process on 14e if he's taking P58^5-1. I was just afraid this number was stalled. Is it fully sieved? Maybe one of the NFS@Home mods can let us know? |
C169_HP2
I'll take the C169_HP2 number once it finishes up.
|
[QUOTE=swellman;406572]What is the latest status of the sieving? The 15e statistics listed on the NFS@Home site seem a bit strange for this number.
I believe I can complete the LA if it's available but don't want to step on toes if someone has tacitly reserved it.[/QUOTE] I'm running the LA and it should be done on Tuesday |
GW_11_229 done
1 Attachment(s)
[code]
Fri Jul 24 23:14:06 2015 p72 factor: 265858991650805763853856221133845177564247006136122390636610391745301427 Fri Jul 24 23:14:06 2015 p128 factor: 11851539073842395314681435151602186165783548785182184916799941574453402392452064240778159323293117824431189938985019671155612273 [/code] About 36 hours on Xeon E5-2650v2 -t8 for 9.51M matrix of density 120 |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:37. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.