If you are using Linux etc this script could be helpful.

Rename to waitfor.sh and run as follows: [code]
waitfor.sh 12345;next_command -parameters
[/code]
Replace 12345 with the PID of the job that's running now. When that stops waitfor.sh will soon end and the command after the ; will run.

Chris

Reserving C190_179743_47, once it's done sieving later this week. Hard to tell it's actual status - the [url=https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/crunching.php]estimated pending relations field[/url] seems a bit wonky - but I believe a matrix can be built.

In other news, the three big NFS jobs I currently have reserved should all finish this week.

Reserving C194_69655517_31

C217_143_51 will be a bit late (probably Thursday) because I forgot to check it was running before going home for the weekend.

C194_69655517_31 needs significantly more sieving (399189213 relations of which 313468110 unique produces a 25.9M matrix at density 70) so I've added another 25% to the range.

C205_125_117
 

C205_125_117 factored

[code]
prp75 factor: 100885093929626251635775317267736996137727439630450175639304563467156046629
prp131 factor: 12701496319468862837540492499469260574619899842603552199357289643382259003486793559772776562561562290594514802351579644894083619029
[/code]

C190_179743_47 has managed to build a matrix at TD=70. 648 hrs ETA. I'll just grind it out.

[QUOTE=swellman;463788]C190_179743_47 has managed to build a matrix at TD=70. 648 hrs ETA. I'll just grind it out.[/QUOTE]

No, no, no. Ask Tom to push more Qs for it. In the mean time you can take C216_143_53 since I won't be back home to start it until the weekend.

Chris2be8 posted a nice utility but I didn't have time to test it before my departure. I do see other uses for it and possibly post-processing in the future.

[QUOTE=RichD;463794]No, no, no. Ask Tom to push more Qs for it. In the mean time you can take C216_143_53 since I won't be back home to start it until the weekend.

Chris2be8 posted a nice utility but I didn't have time to test it before my departure. I do see other uses for it and possibly post-processing in the future.[/QUOTE]

I get what you are saying but how much time will be saved with more Q and a tighter matrix (say TD=120)? A few days or is it a significant % saved?

You keep C216_143_53 - it's only a few more days to the weekend. I'm a bit overcommitted as it is. But I'll keep my reservation for C190_179743_47, however it plays out.


391896643 raw relations with 310335082 unique produces a 26M matrix @TD=70. I've paused this job for now.

[QUOTE=swellman;463795]I get what you are saying but how much time will be saved with more Q and a tighter matrix (say TD=120)? A few days or is it a significant % saved?

You keep C216_143_53 - it's only a few more days to the weekend. I'm a bit overcommitted as it is. But I'll keep my reservation for C190_179743_47, however it plays out.


391896643 raw relations with 310335082 unique produces a 26M matrix @TD=70. I've paused this job for now.[/QUOTE]

From memory I've been running about 380-400 hours on 32-bit jobs with TD=120-130 on a Core-i5 2500K with four threads.

C217_143_51 done
 

[code]
Thu Jul 20 01:20:05 2017 p84 factor: 315081310393501878216040828192206404963398017134567669168325803739898920745212114911
Thu Jul 20 01:20:05 2017 p134 factor: 12211655599656173996660665325606432763190132541118112927283296244519068892798147931671692296548735071391014776103600989212452200312907
[/code]

About 75.8 hours on 7 threads E5-2650v2 for a 12.29M density-142 matrix (not enough relations for density 146). Log attached and at [url]https://pastebin.com/Fdgrz6FC[/url]

C254_133_85
 

C254_133_85 factored

[code]
prp121 factor: 2522479326958335193262464788832784044724241938144752048623231116420930005246613749022425952915031239001448310677586692919
prp133 factor: 9661921682976101386877076108410549657876378180954074977766603179286888755622058010114462730030563197789881940277972689815469022912371
[/code]