![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=swellman;452852]I'll take 4018159^37 - 1.[/QUOTE]
[code] prp57 factor: 135548320583621340036652989436372477851397776060447819133 prp182 factor: 41009286458906896128598529848605933893628728984062220190440804182817893733878020853362745214767127739326133846210453493997523089317038309268718590414487668576523647467915034385125237 [/code] |
Reserving Aliquot sequence 829332 step 3638.
Rich Smith |
I'll take C237_12119_59 next.
|
Question on 143^93+93^143
I recently upgraded my best machine to 32Gb - can it handle 143^93+93^143 (a 33-bit job)? My fear is being able to filter/digest the relations but LA taking months on an i7-3610QM processor. It's a fun machine but it is still a laptop.
Any advice? |
[QUOTE=swellman;455005]I recently upgraded my best machine to 32Gb - can it handle 143^93+93^143 (a 33-bit job)? My fear is being able to filter/digest the relations but LA taking months on an i7-3610QM processor. It's a fun machine but it is still a laptop.
Any advice?[/QUOTE] The last 33-bit job I did took nine weeks on a 32GB i7/5820K, which has two more cores and a significantly better memory subsystem, and is in a water-cooled desktop machine that ran unattended 24/7. It used more than 20GB of memory for the nine weeks. I think probably you'd be biting off more than you can chew. |
[QUOTE=fivemack;455020]The last 33-bit job I did took nine weeks on a 32GB i7/5820K, which has two more cores and a significantly better memory subsystem, and is in a water-cooled desktop machine that ran unattended 24/7. It used more than 20GB of memory for the nine weeks.
I think probably you'd be biting off more than you can chew.[/QUOTE] Another dream dashed on the rocks of reality! Thank you for the sage advice - I will not take on that particular monster. |
C250_51119
Reserving C250_51119 for postprocessing.
|
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;454830]I'll take C204_19xx41_11 next from the 14e queue.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://pastebin.com/idNyTnjH[/url] [code]prp96 factor: 270892972436863301491088297560979089306896792704053757187310273750945188048996014955337256552731 prp109 factor: 7398110844213426351156178245176066325401844989748252418726848842312135868770348721366318901478787377099591309[/code] Density 120 failed to build, "too few cycles". 104 went fine, matrix was 6.4M. |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;455054][code]prp96 factor: 270892972436863301491088297560979089306896792704053757187310273750945188048996014955337256552731
prp109 factor: 7398110844213426351156178245176066325401844989748252418726848842312135868770348721366318901478787377099591309[/code][/QUOTE] Oops, I posted the factors to FDB. I thought you forgot to but now I see you are just now posting your results. Not to worry because it wasn't already factored. I just posted your results. RichD. |
That would be my whoops- I haven't been posting factors to factorDB when I do LA for these. I just assumed that whomever posted the number for NFS@home would make use of the factors (posting to factordb, etc).
When I take care of that next time, do I just enter the composite and its factors? Am I supposed to enter it by its special form? Thanks for fixing my oversight! |
Reserving 98999_231.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.