5+2_406 done
 

[code]
Tue Dec 20 20:57:09 2016 p80 factor: 24266803436460654890957609552633028323702371694435216108897929345398392536462349
Tue Dec 20 20:57:09 2016 p108 factor: 106524245409422697403221200185066197281420479601196032133740728484858542495855038280023594779334376338568169
[/code]

35.7 hours on 6 threads i7/4930K for 8.94M matrix at density 120

Log at [url]http://pastebin.com/KM678GNB[/url] and attached

Reserving 5+3_406 (14e).

C260_126_125
 

[URL="http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id=1000000000044744150"]126^125+125^126[/URL] is factored.
[CODE]Wed Dec 21 08:21:53 2016 p72 factor: 903005800501979075091663476538494701082830832259321926450394960986274137
Wed Dec 21 08:21:53 2016 p188 factor: 36448798779564014072835807007097755862931337852559798299192204957241030733854182144972691818712825796783207158189936809162582411741344342593275137340590306107282351839762764152618314159067
[/CODE]
LA took ~142.3h for a 15.6e6 matrix using 2x 6 threads on Dual Xeon E5-2620@2.0GHz.
Log attached and at [URL]http://pastebin.com/3qFra0bn[/URL]

Reserving 5+4_406

C262_129_110 done
 

[code]
Wed Dec 21 02:33:58 2016 p67 factor: 8314314075656211374067621050936123558904254463338356486476888889759
Wed Dec 21 02:33:58 2016 p87 factor: 510597238203887871813707338499030917348451746619769335074338063413477290361718501589607
Wed Dec 21 02:33:58 2016 p108 factor: 725259037389199378385080852894470971793811012440455681621679820679972872058656681902537311862030717465743087
[/code]

About 169 hours for 17.17M density-150 matrix on 7 cores E5-2650v2

Log attached and at [url]http://pastebin.com/uUZhCyyg[/url] - it's a bit long because I filtered four times to determine that density=160 didn't work and density=150 did.

(rolls sleeves back down again)

I'm afraid C197_141_86 may be one for Greg:

[code]
Wed Dec 21 04:52:36 2016 weight of 44287911 cycles is about 5669689759 (128.02/cycle)
[/code]

and the matrix-preparation process is using 20G on a 32G machine that I want to be able also to do software development on.

Returning that one to the pool - if Greg doesn't decide to do it, I can stick it on my 64G 48xK10 machine for a couple of months in the New Year. Taking C259_130_107 instead.

... that's odd, when I delete my name from the 'postprocessor' field and update, it comes back. I can change it, but not to nothing.

[QUOTE=fivemack;449663](rolls sleeves back down again)

I'm afraid C197_141_86 may be one for Greg:

[code]
Wed Dec 21 04:52:36 2016 weight of 44287911 cycles is about 5669689759 (128.02/cycle)
[/code]

and the matrix-preparation process is using 20G on a 32G machine that I want to be able also to do software development on.

Returning that one to the pool - if Greg doesn't decide to do it, I can stick it on my 64G 48xK10 machine for a couple of months in the New Year. Taking C259_130_107 instead.
[/QUOTE]

Might some extra sieving make the filtering/LA easier? Looks like you're already trying that...

[QUOTE=fivemack;449663]
... that's odd, when I delete my name from the 'postprocessor' field and update, it comes back. I can change it, but not to nothing.[/QUOTE]
See the directions at the top of the management page.

C202_140_102
 

I'll take care of C202_140_102 next.

18041^53-1
 

You know what, let me have 18041^53 - 1 too :)

Reserving 21491^53 (14e).

5+2_377 (14e) factored.
 

[code]
p70 factor: 2039457381098010116115404510035359677843450014041559549321400936336051
p120 factor: 173859824173261385311752044736302094695340846428362190806876408753231025229250655805165998266450190029606359916164209809
[/code]

Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/SRzHijwr[/url]