C241_121_116 done
 

[code]
Sun Nov 20 20:07:11 2016 p84 factor: 382287215827374516490913335371311113681067958598268402528490562590751491450318848599
Sun Nov 20 20:07:11 2016 p157 factor: 3400940389968403667731539737448696123231575042827382632730660962351212715477766287828544695265357156149504130573165768485381955913367322088713721160358336633
[/code]

70.3 hours for 11.4M density-152 matrix on 6 threads i7-4930K. Log attached and at [url]http://pastebin.com/Cba9U0a6[/url]

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;447488]Taking 8-7_305 (14e).[/QUOTE]
Can't manage to build a matrix with TD set to 140 and 130.

P223 (284688...)+1 done
 

[code]
Sat Nov 19 00:32:32 2016 p108 factor: 716905281051458361496599418461912038526878202032358002696049777126802136327392049986279278218827331523325193
Sat Nov 19 00:32:32 2016 p115 factor: 1985539808000448864336423843924848069332363172535981202002959354687318573297260097054958575980797727863937374396257
[/code]

About 376 hours for 26.4M density-110 matrix on 7 threads E5-2650v2 (two intervening reboots)

Log attached and at [url]http://pastebin.com/BhQAzWsm[/url]

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;447515]Can't manage to build a matrix with TD set to 140 and 130.[/QUOTE]
Thank you Jon for the extra sieving. Trying once again, I'll came back within 3 hours to share if LA is underway.

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;447540]Thank you Jon for the extra sieving. Trying once again, I'll came back within 3 hours to share if LA is underway.[/QUOTE]

Actually, I think that doing more sieving was the wrong choice. The reason the matrix wouldn't build was that there were [I]too many[/I] relations. If you cut it down (I tried filter_maxrels=250000000), then it manages to finish the filtering just fine with td=130.

[QUOTE=jyb;447548]Actually, I think that doing more sieving was the wrong choice. The reason the matrix wouldn't build was that there were [I]too many[/I] relations. If you cut it down (I tried filter_maxrels=250000000), then it manages to finish the filtering just fine with td=130.[/QUOTE]

But shouldn't the matrix be built even when you have oversieved SNFS220? Anyway, I'm already in bed and filtering is still going on and I can see twice message "matrix not dense enough, retrying". Think another hour and LA will be running but I won't be awake to control this.

Ps( using my iPhone to connect to UK home machine).

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;447552]But shouldn't the matrix be built even when you have oversieved SNFS220? Anyway, I'm already in bed and filtering is still going on and I can see twice message "matrix not dense enough, retrying". Think another hour and LA will be running but I won't be awake to control this.

Ps( using my iPhone to connect to UK home machine).[/QUOTE]

I don't know the details (I'm sure jasonp could enlighten us), but I know that there are times when too many relations will result in just the situation you're seeing. The solution is to cut down the number of relations a bit.

In any case, I ran the filtering with 250M relations, and it built a matrix without any trouble.

[QUOTE=jyb;447554]I don't know the details (I'm sure jasonp could enlighten us), but I know that there are times when too many relations will result in just the situation you're seeing. The solution is to cut down the number of relations a bit.

In any case, I ran the filtering with 250M relations, and it built a matrix without any trouble.[/QUOTE]

Just stayed talking with my wife whilst awaiting for the LA to start and it's underway with an ETA of 71 hours. Almost midnight here so now I'm going to sleep.

Reserving 3366:i2156.

Reserving 127^93+93^127 cofactor (15e).

Reserving C229_148_70.