[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;441927][CODE]setting target matrix density to 120.0
found 58942256 hash collisions in 248273964 relations
found 63751916 duplicates and 184522048 unique relations
commencing Lanczos iteration (4 threads)
memory use: 5843.4 MB
linear algebra at 0.0%, ETA 244h13m[/CODE]I´ll try with TD=130 to see if LA ETA goes down but I don't think the matrix will be built. More special Q will be needed. I'll get back in 3 hours to let you guys know.[/QUOTE]

No luck with TD=130 for C202_123_83 therefore we need to push for more special Q. Unreserving this integer.

6-5_311 (14e) factored.
 

[code]
p61 factor: 1441272309690101331005245941336317221061882079252666725456011
p164 factor: 57795559460024408890893354711289519840232075360480784603663390937282206965659640068644447890590255231469190550660376682757446900992479723336481772272883555954709817
[/code]

Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/aSN5k4Ts[/url]

5+2_347 (14e) factored.
 

[code]
p54 factor: 116644931381195969238436567697114888845476708629143451
p158 factor: 16211649818346561924134621758882290253653724918163983782971342170279375283070146054216952783705234429922846610947880083221909916997556370430823879689532371681
[/code]

Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/nSjpbPGD[/url]

5+3_347 (14e) factored.
 

[code]
p86 factor: 71756873971770868642842745934902782056292977489458086664640392702726495046251002727669
p121 factor: 1340962911505247218656347375172556599711354750853531017819563006982453178770306824236340677581386484316447389151036610663
[/code]

Log: [url]http://pastebin.com/tUzYERYL[/url]

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;441942][QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;441927][CODE]setting target matrix density to 120.0
found 58942256 hash collisions in 248273964 relations
found 63751916 duplicates and 184522048 unique relations
commencing Lanczos iteration (4 threads)
memory use: 5843.4 MB
linear algebra at 0.0%, ETA 244h13m[/CODE]

I´ll try with TD=130 to see if LA ETA goes down but I don't think the matrix will be built. More special Q will be needed. I'll get back in 3 hours to let you guys know.[/QUOTE]

No luck with TD=130 for C202_123_83 therefore we need to push for more special Q. Unreserving this integer.[/QUOTE]

Ugh, > 25% duplicates is unfortunate. We can add more work, but as you know we get diminishing returns: lower yield and even more duplicates. What were the matrix dimensions when you built with td=120?

[QUOTE=jyb;441949]Ugh, > 25% duplicates is unfortunate. We can add more work, but as you know we get diminishing returns: lower yield and even more duplicates. What were the matrix dimensions when you built with td=120?[/QUOTE]

If I remember 15M^2, on mobile, laptop is shutdown.

Edit: Please see attached files.

C182_133_62
 

Reserving C182_133_62 (14e).

Reserving 3+2_508 (14e).

Reserving 11+3_233 (14e).

Reserving C194_137_54 (14e).

Reserving C178_140_114 (14e).