![]() |
[QUOTE=petrw1;392861]Is LL getting close to not keeping up?[/QUOTE]
To optimal levels? Yes. [QUOTE=petrw1;392861]Just to be clear on "breadth first" doesn't make sense. Are you implying it is better to: 1. Take all DC to 69, then 70 then 71 then 72 2. Take each lowest DC all the way to 72 ... this is where I currently am 3. Stop wasting time on DC and do LL instead[/QUOTE] Option 3 first. Option 2 second. Option 1 if it amuses you. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;392849]Further, it should be noted that doing the "breadth first" search many are doing may be fun, but it doesn't really make all the much sense.[/QUOTE]
Neither does having a 680 watt space heater under my desk consuming 1.8 gigajoules per month dividing numbers. ;) That's about 25 kg of CO[sub]2[/sub] per month into in the air based on the local energy mix. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;392870]To optimal levels? Yes.[/QUOTE]
So when I see about 45,000 Cat 3 (Rounding 65-70M) and about 25,000 Cat 4 (70-75M) .... are these NOT all to optimal level; in other words were they released at a lower bit level but with available resources should be deeper? Never mind, I can look it up ... VERY FEW exponents in the 6x - 7xM range are factored to the optimal 75 bits. [url]http://www.mersenne.info/trial_factored_tabular_data/2/60000000/[/url] [url]http://www.mersenne.info/trial_factored_tabular_data/2/70000000/[/url] |
[QUOTE=chalsall;392870]
Option 3 first. [/QUOTE] I could move my 500GhzDays/Day there. While I'd like to see DCTF die I'll go where most needed. |
[QUOTE=petrw1;392883]While I'd like to see DCTF die I'll go where most needed.[/QUOTE]
LLTF is most needed. |
Y'all guilted me into option 2.
|
[QUOTE=Xyzzy;392863]What is the optimal LLTF strategy?[/QUOTE]
1. Buy 1000 GPUs (possibly Titans, or newer, possible in boxes with dual Xeonx...) 2. Install misfit 3. Profit |
[QUOTE=LaurV;392937]1. Buy 1000 GPUs (possibly Titans, or newer, possible in boxes with dual Xeonx...)
2. Install misfit 3. Profit[/QUOTE]I think you left out a step: 1.5 Install a new 4000A 3-phase incoming line |
[QUOTE=LaurV;392937]possibly Titans[/QUOTE]
A Titan costs $1000, burns 250W and produces 400 GHz-day/day A 980 costs $600, burns 165W, and produces 520 GHz-day/day A R9 290X costs $400, burns 250W, and produces 600 GHz-day/day Don't buy Titans for TF. |
[QUOTE=axn;392941]A Titan costs $1000, burns 250W and produces 400 GHz-day/day
A 980 costs $600, burns 165W, and produces 520 GHz-day/day A R9 290X costs $400, burns 250W, and produces 600 GHz-day/day Don't buy Titans for TF.[/QUOTE] My 970 was $450 (Canadian even) ... not sure what it burns ... produces 515 /day if I keep the room cold. :) It heat throttles itself. |
[QUOTE=petrw1;392955]My 970 was $450 (Canadian even) ... not sure what it burns ... produces 515 /day if I keep the room cold. :) It heat throttles itself.[/QUOTE]
a cold room in Canada means -20°C... :razz: |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 08:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.