[QUOTE=Mark Rose;426995]I'll stick to LLTF. I really don't care about the rankings. :)[/QUOTE]

Nobody REALLY cares about the rankings that is in this project for the long term. We all just need something to justify our arbitrary allocation of hardware/time/money/power/etc. and reasonably achievable short term goals provide justification :)

[QUOTE=chalsall;426985]... In about eight years....[/QUOTE]

Well, the goal for some of us is to shorten that number up... I still have ambitions of getting early-error-detection style DC into the project. That might actually happen in about... eight years...

What cards are people extending DCTF with?

If anyone is interested, I can create lists of assignments above 69M that could use more DCTF appropriate to those cards, based on the crossover points on mersenne.ca

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;427410]What cards are people extending DCTF with?

If anyone is interested, I can create lists of assignments above 69M that could use more DCTF appropriate to those cards, based on the crossover points on mersenne.ca[/QUOTE]

Well right now it's going to be my Titans not on Water to avoid blowing MOSFETs and a collection of the Fury X's. After the DCTF part 2 push the Fury cards will go back to DCLL and hopefully get those Titans on water.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;427410]If anyone is interested, I can create lists of assignments above 69M that could use more DCTF appropriate to those cards, based on the crossover points on mersenne.ca[/QUOTE]

While I very much appreciate your clearing out the higher DCTF work, might I suggest we put off doing any additional such work? It's going to be something like 15 years before such candidates get handed out!

Over that time I suspect the optimal curves will change several times. :smile:

[QUOTE=chalsall;427423]While I very much appreciate your clearing out the higher DCTF work, might I suggest we put off doing any additional such work? It's going to be something like 15 years before such candidates get handed out!

Over that time I suspect the optimal curves will change several times. :smile:[/QUOTE]

True. But I look at how eagerly the high assignments you pulled in were gobbled up lol

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;427436]True. But I look at how eagerly the high assignments you pulled in were gobbled up lol[/QUOTE]

I know I pulled them in out of principle, they had been on the DC Current Trial Factored level report for a while even if they weren't on the estimated completion report. My thought is that the Appropriate Level is so dynamic that it is difficult to use as a target unless you're actually doing the TF and DC for the exponent yourself on the same card.

Did we move the goalpost again?

[QUOTE=airsquirrels;427946]Did we move the goalpost again?[/QUOTE]

Not that I'm aware of. Could you elaborate?

It looked like another chunk of factors in the 61M range appeared, but perhaps it is just my memory failing. It has been a very busy week in the real world....

Update 21 ... March 7, 2016 (Maybe the penultimate)
 

Sorry I was AWOL in February .... no February stats....

1,173,910 GhzDays in the last month.
7 different contributors
488 Factors found (Interestingly this is getting smaller as the GhzDays effort remains the same)
59,203 P1/LL/DC work saved

3 contributors currently have assignments
3,448 Assignments out. (These should be the last)

14 estimated days to completion (I had to guess...GPU72 says none)
March 21, 2016 ....Spring is in the air????

MILESTONES
Complete to 60M.
Complete to 73 Bits.
All exponents assigned.