![]() |
I reached x=30,000 and found 2 new PRPs:
474^27863+27863^474, 74556 digits, 536^29847+29847^536, 81458 digits. |
I have now finished with the Leyland numbers in the gap between L(40495,114) <83295 digits> and L(35917,214) <83702 digits> and have found therein 6 new PRPs:
L(20850,9971) <83374> L(20519,11572) <83378> L(21368,8085) <83500> L(26870,1293) <83609> L(19522,19283) <83656> L(20091,14596) <83664> |
I reached x=31,000 and found 3 new PRPs:
734^30453+30453^734, 87270 digits, 423^30634+30634^423, 80456 digits, 758^30693+30693^758, 88386 digits. |
I have now finished with the Leyland numbers in the gap between L(35917,214) <83702 digits> and L(39070,143) <84209 digits> and have found therein 7 new PRPs:
L(23543,3610) <83755> L(20625,11522) <83770> L(19551,19268) <83773> L(21457,8200) <83979> L(21234,9067) <84033> L(20996,10059) <84038> L(21485,8224) <84116> |
I reached x=32,000 and found 1 new PRP:
496^31671+31671^496, 85369 digits. |
I'm looking for the date of discovery of Anatoly Selevich's L(8656,2929) <30008 digits>. This number went on to be proven prime, which may have been why it wasn't in PRPtop when I added it on his behalf in Aug. 2015. For the record, I have eight other Leyland primes with more than 10000 decimal digits for which I don't have a discovery date:
<10041> L(3571,648) Paul Leyland <10073> L(2930,2739) Greg Childers <10094> L(3265,1234) Leonid Muraviov <13740> L(5140,471) Paul Leyland <15071> L(4405,2638) Greg Childers <16868> L(5182,1799) Paul Leyland <17283> L(5154,2255) Paul Leyland <18195> L(5155,3384) Paul Leyland If anyone can reference a discovery date for any of these, I'd be very grateful. |
There are currently 1000 Leyland primes listed in PRPtop. Since my currently known number is 1302, we therefore have 302 missing: 128 (from Paul Leyland), 54 (Andrey Kulsha), 52 (Greg Childers), 25 (Peter Liaskovsky), 23 (Christ van Willegen), 5 (Alexander Kuzmich), 4 (Rob Binnekamp), 3 (Leonid Muraviov), 2 (each, from Mark Rodenkirch, Henri Lifchitz, Göran Hemdal, & Sander Hoogendoorn). My (Hans Havermann) PRPtop Leyland prime listing includes 6 that are actually from "firejuggler".
There are 1250 Leyland primes in Andrey Kulsha's [URL="http://www.primefan.ru/xyyxf/primes.html"]Jan. 2017 list[/URL]. The missing 52 are accounted for by discoveries from me (44) and Norbert Schneider (8). My ongoing Leyland prime indexing effort is [URL="http://chesswanks.com/num/a094133.txt"]here[/URL]. |
[QUOTE=pxp;483924]I'm looking for the date of discovery of Anatoly Selevich's L(8656,2929) <30008 digits>. This number went on to be proven prime, which may have been why it wasn't in PRPtop when I added it on his behalf in Aug. 2015. For the record, I have eight other Leyland primes with more than 10000 decimal digits for which I don't have a discovery date:
<10041> L(3571,648) Paul Leyland <10073> L(2930,2739) Greg Childers <10094> L(3265,1234) Leonid Muraviov <13740> L(5140,471) Paul Leyland <15071> L(4405,2638) Greg Childers <16868> L(5182,1799) Paul Leyland <17283> L(5154,2255) Paul Leyland <18195> L(5155,3384) Paul Leyland If anyone can reference a discovery date for any of these, I'd be very grateful.[/QUOTE]It's just about possible, though unlikely, I may be able to find the information for the ones I discovered. It will require digging through decade-old material from when I worked for MSRC. All will be between (roughly) 2000 and 2005. Paul |
I believe that I can construct reasonable discovery dates for all but Anatoly Selevich's L(8656,2929) by using Paul's [URL="http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/primes/xyyx.htm"]ranges-being-searched table[/URL]. Obviously the date will fall between when-reserved and when-completed in roughly the same proportion as x falls between xmin and xmax. That leaves L(8656,2929) as being discovered after Oct. 2006, since this number is not yet in Paul's primes-and-strong-pseudoprimes list.
|
I've put Selevich's Leyland prime output from Aug 2007 through Jan 2008 (as dated in PRPtop) [URL="http://chesswanks.com/num/SelevitchLeylandPrimeDiscoveries.txt"]here[/URL]. It seems that (8656,2929) should fall somewhere in this date-range but it isn't obvious to me what's going on. He was likely searching different (x,y)-ranges on different processors.
|
The odds of finding a d-digit Leyland prime where d ~ 100000 are (empirically) about 1 in 75. In other words, one should expect to find about 40 Leyland primes with digit-size ranging from 100000 to 103000. What are the odds when d ~ 400000 ?
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 20:52. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.