[QUOTE=Mark Rose;393198]Have you found any other problematic machines whose TF work needs to be checked?[/QUOTE]

Maybe some in the first 2 charts of my post #154???

[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=393083&postcount=154[/url]

[QUOTE=LaurV;393186]This looks like "fresh factoring", i.e. the expected number of factors like the range was never touched. It is not like few accidentally omissions.[/QUOTE]
It is like having a time capsule and joining a prehistoric hunt, but armed with a machine gun. Basically, we are experiencing history, but we have GPUs and 1THzDay is not a big issue at least for some :smile:.

[QUOTE=petrw1;393180]10 hours ... 40% through the range ... 7 new factors so far.
Smallest just over 64 bits; largest just under 69 bits.
It's funny watching the classes [STRIKE]roll[/STRIKE] fly by when its doing 65-66 bit range.
Thruput dropped from about 510 to 490 GhzDays/Day.
I may have some configuration parameters too high for smaller bit ranges.???

[CODE]Manual testing 72401041 F 2015-01-22 14:27 0.0 218291136715616382799 0.2332
Manual testing 72382501 F 2015-01-22 14:27 0.0 342944142087508898161 0.1788
Manual testing 72363173 F 2015-01-22 14:27 0.0 544002637626766728503 0.7288
Manual testing 72349657 F 2015-01-22 14:27 0.0 315890959036043643191 0.0810
Manual testing 72337151 F 2015-01-22 14:27 0.0 34504309201726567649 0.0467
Manual testing 72237229 F 2015-01-22 10:27 0.0 364475248423316556359 0.2519
Manual testing 72180077 F 2015-01-22 10:27 0.0 210713469140678257513 0.2128[/CODE][/QUOTE]


4 more ...

[CODE]Manual testing 72605201 F 2015-01-22 18:27 0.0 500990223783061289983 0.6285
Manual testing 72562397 F 2015-01-22 18:27 0.0 87831182112341748793 0.0518
Manual testing 72523147 F 2015-01-22 18:27 0.0 335176031292832929289 0.1512
Manual testing 72506251 F 2015-01-22 18:27 0.0 336037822780058053313 0.1543[/CODE]

I guess I can post my list of 18 factors so far:

[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=51890519&full=1]M51890519[/url] has a factor: 422835347805002599631 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52138049&full=1]M52138049[/url] has a factor: 535974705886413199687 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52562327&full=1]M52562327[/url] has a factor: 296938917474700320121 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52722451&full=1]M52722451[/url] has a factor: 373035884518340430911 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52733041&full=1]M52733041[/url] has a factor: 525148122526114916273 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52736731&full=1]M52736731[/url] has a factor: 467377202976495825521 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52744631&full=1]M52744631[/url] has a factor: 441418946165759376247 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52752289&full=1]M52752289[/url] has a factor: 386313131512887140663 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52761881&full=1]M52761881[/url] has a factor: 515978965975485900689 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52762363&full=1]M52762363[/url] has a factor: 575234307694178809343 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52777031&full=1]M52777031[/url] has a factor: 418383038793943568999 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52780037&full=1]M52780037[/url] has a factor: 533917432484655670393 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=68723147&full=1]M68723147[/url] has a factor: 269124663607229949599 [TF:67:68*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=68751467&full=1]M68751467[/url] has a factor: 272933318409841166999 [TF:67:68*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=68781347&full=1]M68781347[/url] has a factor: 112647003103135552151 [TF:65:67*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=68819329&full=1]M68819329[/url] has a factor: 372086203916326209001 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=68850539&full=1]M68850539[/url] has a factor: 273503990877618318281 [TF:67:68*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=80072843&full=1]M80072843[/url] has a factor: 50231130793387599631 [TF:65:66*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]

I'm basically working on two stream, with the 2 GTX 580's sharing work up to 68.7, and the GTX 760 doing 68.7 to 70. Easiest way to balance the work.

Interesting is [url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=68850539&full=1]68850539[/url] which was assigned to 5 users for LL. I don't know if there's a bug in overwriting the expire date.

[url=http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=52777031&full=1]52777031[/url] was already found by P-1.

In the end it would be interesting to know:

1. How many factors found
2. How many FIRST factors
3. How many were for exponents in progress
a. Two of mine were so far; one had TF assigned; one LL; both "expired" when I submitted my factors
4. How much "work" is saved: P-1; LL; DC
5. How much "work" did it take to do this re-check
6. How much work was wasted (later TF; P-1, LL, DC, etc. already done) though this could be depressing; also hard to count for partial assignments in progress.
7. Anything else?

I can answer 5 already: 10240 GHz-days, minus a little bit when sannerud.com continued factoring to bit levels beyond a missed exponent (which I have seen).

For anyone curious, the following ranges are still available:

76-77M: 1343 GHz-days
77-78M: 869 GHz-days
78-79M: 715 GHz-days
79-80M: 665 GHz-days

The assignments are be copy and pasted out of [url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/MarkRose/ebc25e1adc2a1668605b/raw/498828c4129f96ee8152eca1d7e846b5757b4837/worktodo.txt]this file[/url].

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;393232]For anyone curious, the following ranges are still available:

76-77M: 1343 GHz-days
77-78M: 869 GHz-days
78-79M: 715 GHz-days
79-80M: 665 GHz-days

The assignments are be copy and pasted out of [URL="https://gist.githubusercontent.com/MarkRose/ebc25e1adc2a1668605b/raw/498828c4129f96ee8152eca1d7e846b5757b4837/worktodo.txt"]this file[/URL].[/QUOTE]

My first batch are nearly done; I will also take 76-77M

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;393232]For anyone curious, the following ranges are still available:

76-77M: 1343 GHz-days
77-78M: 869 GHz-days
78-79M: 715 GHz-days
79-80M: 665 GHz-days

The assignments are be copy and pasted out of [url=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/MarkRose/ebc25e1adc2a1668605b/raw/498828c4129f96ee8152eca1d7e846b5757b4837/worktodo.txt]this file[/url].[/QUOTE]

77-78M

[STRIKE]I can take 78-79M, if it is tolerable to do it in 4-5 days.[/STRIKE]
Although I want to do it (or 79-80M as suggested), I realised that it is better for the project to be done quicker. This is semi-hot range and it could be nice to clean it fast. I jumped in because of impatience, but it is actually stupid. It seems that for the big guns around it will be over in 12-16h. Go for it, I have another double-check to do :smile:. Sorry for the spam (the moderators may feel free to delete this post as unnecessary).

[QUOTE=bloodIce;393238]I can take 78-79M, if it is tolerable to do it in 4-5 days.[/QUOTE]

That's fine. Why not take 79-80M? It's smaller.