![]() |
Tested out the mentioned C207 manually by just dividing the numbers, but for now Yafu says 7.76 hours more to go on the remaining C144.
I will perhaps get some answers to these numbers later on. |
[QUOTE=storflyt32;400314]Tested out the mentioned C207 manually by just dividing the numbers, but for now Yafu says 7.76 hours more to go on the remaining C144.
I will perhaps get some answers to these numbers later on.[/QUOTE] Check again. |
Thank you for doing that.
To people like me who are not supposed to be hacking and cracking numbers or at least codes, they become only a small part of a big puzzle. Came across a YouTube video while looking for other contents. [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmIDluvVZ2M[/url] Worth watching. |
Came across this C103 a couple of days ago.
5257580682287346125119700202910679229423527432847302135626002052012162827616986817714988158206959997053 If you wish, you may give it a try. Possibly not the easiest number to factorize. |
[QUOTE=storflyt32;400632]Came across this C103 a couple of days ago.
5257580682287346125119700202910679229423527432847302135626002052012162827616986817714988158206959997053 If you wish, you may give it a try. Possibly not the easiest number to factorize.[/QUOTE] What is special about this number? An arbitrary C103 number can be factored using GGNFS in under 1 hour on a modern 4-core CPU. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 19:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.