![]() |
Seems the first job is almost finished (some 220 curves missing) without any hits, will you please enqueue the second job?
|
[QUOTE=jagotu;534475]Seems the first job is almost finished (some 220 curves missing) without any hits, will you please enqueue the second job?[/QUOTE]
I’ve submitted the second job for 3366 to Yoyo. It should appear in the AS queue overnight. Eta: Second job enqueued. |
The C189 has been split:
[code]p94 factor: 1075372279112461402477523929286579654875995882181340712369237247128315520179716636475520764281 p96 factor: 159075464112138691093107067073029848992057722710297214240206091481279893735856370768849829193209[/code] Next term at i2207 has a c170 that has survived a t35. I'll have a t40 done this evening, and t45 overnight. A c170 happens to match our current CADO development attentions, so I imagine EdH or I will NFS this without use of nfs@home if it survives ECM. |
If it survives ECM, I should be able to do something with it tomorrow. Do I have a modified c170 params? I'll have to check. . .
|
Since you asked-- see the new thread in the CADO forum for c170 params.
I'll add some cores to ECM tonight; I should be able to complete a t50 by midday tomorrow. About 2t40 complete now; I'll report progress at the end of my night in case you decide to run some curves in the morning. Edit: A bit less than a t45 done. Scheduled 3500 curves @6e7 overnight. If I were running this entire job myself, I'd do about 4000 @8e7 next and then NFS; Ed, if you have the hardware to run those curves Wednesday, be my guest. |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;545207]Since you asked-- see the new thread in the CADO forum for c170 params.[/QUOTE]:redface:I forgot!:redface:
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;545207]I'll add some cores to ECM tonight; I should be able to complete a t50 by midday tomorrow. About 2t40 complete now; I'll report progress at the end of my night in case you decide to run some curves in the morning.[/QUOTE]I'm letting a polyselect run finish - hopefully around noon, but I might be tied up and not able to retask at that time. [QUOTE=VBCurtis;545207]Edit: A bit less than a t45 done. Scheduled 3500 curves @6e7 overnight. If I were running this entire job myself, I'd do about 4000 @8e7 next and then NFS; Ed, if you have the hardware to run those curves Wednesday, be my guest.[/QUOTE]Not sure about my hardware at that size - maybe a few machines could run it. I wonder if a Colab GPU session could finish stage 1 before its time limit is reached.:unsure: |
4000 curves at 8e7 underway, should be done in a couple of hours.
|
[QUOTE=charybdis;545233]4000 curves at 8e7 underway, should be done in a couple of hours.[/QUOTE]
I've also started a Colab instance of 832 stage 1 curves. I expect 8-10 hours for that to complete, though, if it even does. Then stage 2 would need completion, as well. BTW, if you'd like to grab the NFS for it, feel free. You'd have better data for Curtis. |
Overnight: 1600 curves at 6e7, 1900 still scheduled. A bit slower than I expected.
I think I underestimated how much ECM is proper here; when my runs wrap up I'll do 1000 or so curves at 15e7. |
I've got some scripts here that will distribute ECM to my machines and count up until stopped (or success). I could start that in a couple hours and see which machines (if any) can handle 15e7.
|
[QUOTE=EdH;545240]BTW, if you'd like to grab the NFS for it, feel free. You'd have better data for Curtis.[/QUOTE]
Could do, but I don't want to leave you without any jobs to run! 4000 curves at 8e7 done, now running 1500 at 15e7. Memory use in stage 2 is peaking just below 1.2G per process. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 09:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.