![]() |
Yes, please do! Your work plus mine means half a t55 will be done by tomorrow, so only a t60 (more like 80% of one, if we use 0.31 * digits for ECM depth) needs to be sent to yoyo.
Swellman will let us know when he sends that in, and we'll stop running our t55 once he does. I'm running on half an i7-5820 (6 cores) and half an HP Z620 (20 cores Ivy Bridge Xeon). I'll keep running t55-sized curves (B1=150M, to be specific) after my 0.2*t55 is done, since you're helping, so that we don't have to send any to yoyo. |
[QUOTE=VBCurtis;533511]Yes, please do! Your work plus mine means half a t55 will be done by tomorrow, so only a t60 (more like 80% of one, if we use 0.31 * digits for ECM depth) needs to be sent to yoyo.
Swellman will let us know when he sends that in, and we'll stop running our t55 once he does. I'm running on half an i7-5820 (6 cores) and half an HP Z620 (20 cores Ivy Bridge Xeon). I'll keep running t55-sized curves (B1=150M, to be specific) after my 0.2*t55 is done, since you're helping, so that we don't have to send any to yoyo.[/QUOTE] Second the notion that you both run ECM to achieve a complete t55 if possible. I can enqueue this aliquot in Yoyo anytime but there will likely be a 1-2 week delay before Yoyo even starts to work it. See the queue [url= http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/download/download/stats/ecm/as/wu_status]here[/url]. If no factors are found by either of you then I can then start Yoyo on ECM towards a t60. |
C189 i2206
Just hit a total of 4500@11e7. If we want to hit full t55, that's something like 20000 curves?
So if we split it in half, it'll take me about two-three more days to hit the 10000. Btw. is there an advantage for 15e7 over 11e7? |
[QUOTE=jagotu;533565]Just hit a total of 4500@11e7. If we want to hit full t55, that's something like 20000 curves?
So if we split it in half, it'll take me about two-three more days to hit the 10000. Btw. is there an advantage for 15e7 over 11e7?[/QUOTE] The t55 level is [url=https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/records/ecm/params.html]typically defined[/url] as 18,000 curves @B1=11e7. |
[QUOTE=jagotu;533565]Just hit a total of 4500@11e7. If we want to hit full t55, that's something like 20000 curves?
So if we split it in half, it'll take me about two-three more days to hit the 10000. Btw. is there an advantage for 15e7 over 11e7?[/QUOTE] I'm a little faster than you are; if you hit 7000 total at 11e7, I'll take care of the rest of the t55. As for 15e7 vs 11e7: If I run GMP-ECM -v for one curve at each size, the estimated time to complete a t55 is a bit shorter for 15e7, while the chances of finding a larger factor are better. It's a win-win, but a very small one. It has to do with the default B2 choices GMP-ECM makes for particular B1 values + memory use for those B2s (in a sense, more memory use for a small speedup). I find a similar result for 6e7 vs 43e6 for a t50, and for 2e7 vs 11e6 for a t45. Basically, I looked for the smallest B1 values above the standard choice for which GMP-ECM chooses k=2 (and a higher memory-use + larger B2 choice), and in each case I find the larger B1 choice yields a faster t-whatever. |
[QUOTE=swellman;533567]The t55 level is [url=https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/records/ecm/params.html]typically defined[/url] as 18,000 curves @B1=11e7.[/QUOTE]
That's the page I was coming from, although I was looking at the GMP-ECM 7 column... [QUOTE=VBCurtis;533568]As for 15e7 vs 11e7: If I run GMP-ECM -v for one curve at each size, the estimated time to complete a t55 is a bit shorter for 15e7, while the chances of finding a larger factor are better.[/QUOTE] A very interesting experiment! Will definitely try to test this on my HW once we're done with this. |
Default C189 i2206
Hit a total of 7180@11e7 (managed to free a few more cores so it went a bit faster).
Will try a few curves at 26e7. |
I ran:
2200@6e7 2000@8e7 3200@15e7 930@30e7 200@42e7 Combined with jagotu's ~7200@11e7, that's a t55 and 14% of a t60. That leaves 75% of a t60 for yoyo, please. |
In addition to the 7180@11e7 I ran 2535@26e7, so that should maybe help with the t60 some more (another 6% of t60?).
|
Nice! So 20% of t60 is done, leaving about 55% for yoyo. I'm using 0.31* digits to get ~59 digits of ECM, which is something like 75% of t60. (my previous post asked for too much of a t60)
Say, 24,000 curves at 26e7 from yoyo? |
I’ll queue the job with Yoyo. Two staggered separate rounds of 12,000 curves @B1=260e6.
Eta: First job enqueued. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 21:52. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.