mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Aliquot Sequences (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=90)
-   -   Reserved for MF - Sequence 3408 (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=18421)

swellman 2015-10-24 11:39

Just over 1200 additional curves so far with no factor found. Full t50 should finish by Sunday night. Or I can shift to B1=110M for 1-2k additional curves.

Or maybe it's time to abandon ECM? Your call. For now I'll just carry on towards t50 unless you say otherwise.

- Sean

VBCurtis 2015-10-24 17:22

How about a couple hundred at 110M, and call it good tonight? I'll start NFS Sun morning USA time.
Edit- anything above half a T50 is sufficient. I didn't calculate how much has been done; if we're past 0.5*T50, no more is needed.

swellman 2015-10-24 20:25

So far, ECM has run ~2300 additional curves @B1=43M. In a couple of hours I will kick it up to B1=110M and let it run overnight. I'm on the east coast and have an early start tomorrow, so I can post yea or nay on any factors being found before you start NFS.

Does this work for you? I believe that will push it to well past 0.5t50 and provide sufficient due diligence to avoid a blatant ECM miss.

VBCurtis 2015-10-24 20:28

That's terrific, thanks for the extra effort. I'll test-sieve today, and will be ready to fire NFS when I wake up tomorrow.

I haven't previously tried running my full desktop on a single NFS task. Going to try 12-threaded sieving on a 6-core i7. Hopefully, I'll have factors in under a week!

swellman 2015-10-24 20:39

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;413665]
I haven't previously tried running my full desktop on a single NFS task. Going to try 12-threaded sieving on a 6-core i7. Hopefully, I'll have factors in under a week![/QUOTE]

Want! :bow:

VBCurtis 2015-10-24 22:07

Rich's 2nd poly sieves about 15% faster than the first, with yield also higher.
I used alim=rlim=33M, 31-bit LP, 2 large primes per side.
I test-sieved at alim/6, alim/3, alim/2, alim, a range of 1500q each (long enough for sec/rel to stabilize to two sigfigs)

Yield was bad at alim/6, so I will start the run at alim/4 (and with alim 35M instead of 33).
Yields at the other test points were roughly the same, around 4.5. For 140M raw relations, that's a range of about 32Mq, roughly q = 9M to 41M.

swellman 2015-10-24 23:36

Ran ECM up to 2680 additional curves @B1=43M, plus the 1550 curves run earlier = 4230 curves, or ~55% of t50.

Now running more curves with B1=110M. Getting throughput of ~66 curves/hr. Should have >700 curves by morning. I'll post the results about 6 AM EDT.

swellman 2015-10-25 10:23

Ran another 760 curves @B1=110M with nothing found. Terminated ECM.

It belongs to NFS now. Happy factoring!

swellman 2015-10-28 12:35

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;413665]That's terrific, thanks for the extra effort. I'll test-sieve today, and will be ready to fire NFS when I wake up tomorrow.

I haven't previously tried running my full desktop on a single NFS task. Going to try 12-threaded sieving on a 6-core i7. Hopefully, I'll have factors in under a week![/QUOTE]

How is the speed looking? Just curious about that "12-headed monster".

VBCurtis 2015-10-28 22:01

79 hrs wallclock time, 78.3M relations of estimated 143M raw rels needed. If a matrix builds the first try, that'll make nearly exactly 6 days sieve time.

There is a single thread of srsieve running, so NFS has 12/13ths of the CPU. I doubt the matrix will solve in under 24 hr, so it will take me more than a week to factor. :-(

swellman 2015-10-29 02:13

8-9 days for a 157 GNFS? Not too shabby for a single machine! Let's hope this sequence starts moving downward.

I'm willing to throw some more ECM into the mix if needed later. Just call for help here. Good luck!


All times are UTC. The time now is 21:52.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.