C179 score
 

1.034e-013

C179 score
 

1.096e-013

[trolling]
If you use a leading zero in front of the exponent, is that octal? :razz:
(sorry, it is Saturday morning, and I could not resist trolling it, during my morning coffee, but it may have a seed of truth, some programs may interpret is like so, and you will end up importing the wrong data...)
[/trolling]

C179
 

This is the best I have found. Any improvements?
[CODE]R0: -20029029394762181000306033508670828
R1: 170451191305026917
A0: -291136282323820445154152809196446094634309
A1: 116905019700065702839392723782241608
A2: 20017925528604521636900338791
A3: -2232766984604161063134
A4: -42742865029136
A5: 6744240
skew 11825700.05, size 1.827e-17, alpha -6.407, combined = 1.042e-13 rroots = 3[/CODE]

[QUOTE=RichD;483325]This is the best I have found. Any improvements?
[CODE]R0: -20029029394762181000306033508670828
R1: 170451191305026917
A0: -291136282323820445154152809196446094634309
A1: 116905019700065702839392723782241608
A2: 20017925528604521636900338791
A3: -2232766984604161063134
A4: -42742865029136
A5: 6744240
skew 11825700.05, size 1.827e-17, alpha -6.407, combined = 1.042e-13 rroots = 3[/CODE][/QUOTE]

CADO can't improve it, sorry.

Just completed 1M-1.5M in 65 hours (not counting -npr time) with no flares to report. Plowing through 1.5-2M now.

I finished 3-5M with nothing of interest (9.7 was best). Continuing from 10M with a tighter stage 1 norm (1.0 rather than 1.2), hoping for one more hit above 1.0.

So far, I think there are 4 polys better than 1.0, three found by Max. I'll be test-sieving the best scoring poly from each hit (not two from the same raw poly, but I think there are 4 different polys above 1.0).

I'll put 3-4 more days in for a 1.10, but Max got 1.09 and that's pretty close!

C179 polys
 

I think I have more than three polys (with different c5) above 1.0. I was just posting the best to date score. I'll list them tomorrow.

Here's my best, from the first day of searching:
[code] R0: -38702504539900119965023479472812033
R1: 196475479114227511
A0: -476387976293826132723316595512383852427220
A1: -2700759220425692205092446910085378
A2: 39000472282285580192748241006
A3: 1419194354508995293134
A4: -241294721170421
A5: 250344
skew 14206346.38, size 1.787e-17, alpha -6.700, combined = 1.006e-13 rroots = 5[/code]
I've started my CADO run for this input; I learned that nq=78125 is folly. Each A5 value takes well over 30 minutes, so even with adrange of 200 some workunits are timing out. Going to run 5000 to 50000 with nq=15625 and see what I get.

C179 polys
 

These three are spin-offs of each other. I only post the top score for each c5.
[code]
# norm 2.454636e-017 alpha -7.241647 e 1.096e-013 rroots 5
skew: 105144915.45
c0: 128190096934918070315443113608723659518354600
c1: 14786907766401977160677345639541928920
c2: -18125436225640906158198747520
c3: -2855680594021742157071
c4: 2573527187756
c5: 104940
Y0: -46052962396833657768138093839124983
Y1: 15647590951762912285331
[/code]
[code]
# norm 2.389422e-017 alpha -7.124052 e 1.093e-013 rroots 5
skew: 46683630.89
c0: 12147507982730241248912761660758366376191250
c1: 2425703948417777713124822586666875775
c2: 17916541482146865032415599038
c3: -2879004999683990389647
c4: -1419696250088
c5: 419760
Y0: -46053060313574339702580320421238527
Y1: 31295181903525824570662
[/code]
[code]
# norm 2.137043e-017 alpha -7.243711 e 1.018e-013 rroots 5
skew: 133948997.78
c0: 130009736819789810356182270011187953639793912
c1: 11145826720420646685964494102681049812
c2: 25550508280467293790165112312
c3: -2879108627384532452999
c4: 345216465928
c5: 26235
Y0: -92106037108851763554397411853389780
Y1: 15647590951762912285331
[/code]

From the first run:
[code]
Y0: -36906870106829364745546078433407322
Y1: 5071288542614620012183
c0: 13565862719704155321348424477107433400483700
c1: -7125085703781307774554382982133785891
c2: 307165389876775291544674605840
c3: 4523368680854237491341
c4: 395934754407770
c5: 3174600
skew: 35092455.05
# size 1.856e-17, alpha -9.076, combined = 1.034e-13 rroots = 3
[/code]
[code]
Y0: -53065898088266323535139022526014268
Y1: 1095048100025399695123
c0: -63302145744815392681906279281481606001653320
c1: 21280046808768311358246595429372288234
c2: -543013809489162646324633117845
c3: -24049997213270183497297
c4: 149759340870432
c5: 2479680
skew: 51269254.30
# size 1.795e-17, alpha -9.136, combined = 1.029e-13 rroots = 5
[/code]

[QUOTE=RichD;483325]This is the best I have found. Any improvements?
[CODE]R0: -20029029394762181000306033508670828
R1: 170451191305026917
A0: -291136282323820445154152809196446094634309
A1: 116905019700065702839392723782241608
A2: 20017925528604521636900338791
A3: -2232766984604161063134
A4: -42742865029136
A5: 6744240
skew 11825700.05, size 1.827e-17, alpha -6.407, combined = 1.042e-13 rroots = 3[/CODE][/QUOTE]

A slightly weaker spin-off of RichD's poly above:
[code]
R0: -10014514696775507757758308413025640
R1: 170451191305026917
A0: 19490706563971111969252190190688123113387
A1: 85494466271403865608479623942793620
A2: -65321591049214481929999770039
A3: -339604994665232248560
A4: 3149887638778624
A5: 215815680
skew: 4394408.93
# size 1.821e-017, alpha -7.021, combined = 1.015e-013 rroots = 5
[/code]